|
Hi All,
Band conditions of late have made things pretty difficult. Lots of QSB, and I'm hearing a lot more noise than usual. Of late, I've had problems getting 100% copy on some stations because the QSB, even when fast and not too deep, has clipped characters I try to copy (on CW) making it easy to miss something here and there. I've been checking my AGC to make sure it was fast rather than slow, but that didn't always solve the problem satisfactorily. Now, I do often just turn the AGC off, but that's usually to avoid the pumping that the AGC can cause. I've always been an advocate of turning the AGC off at times, but I noticed something else recently. Probably I've noticed it before and just didn't think about it. The recent combination of QSB and higher noise were BOTH much improved by just turning the AGC off. The noise went down considerably!!! That improved everything, and copy became 100%, or close to it! I don't know why I didn't think to do this sooner! Anyway, I am guessing that the AGC is enhancing the noise, and it has nothing to do with the K3 itself as to any oddity. Somebody can probably explain this anomaly better to me. I always have to be very careful when turning the AGC off, especially if I am wearing "cans", but it sure does make a big difference on weaker signals. Anyway, it was sort of a "slap your forehead" moment here! Hi. Time for me to read, or re-read, how to properly take advantage of AGC! Dave W7AQK ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
Hi again,
I got several very nice responses to my question already, and it seems I need to do some adjusting. My AGC threshold was set at 5, which apparently is too low. I've also increased by AGC slope setting as well. I'll have to check all this out with some weaker signals to see just how much difference that might have made. Apparently I need to pay a lot more attention to these settings, and may have to adjust them more often depending on conditions, etc. It was also suggested I set these adjustments up in a memory position, which makes a great deal of sense. The K3's AGC seems to work very well, and I just need to take advantage of the fact that it can be adjusted a lot to accommodate different conditions. Thanks for the advice folks, and I welcome any other suggestions as well. With my modest antennas I have to dig signals out of the noise quite often, so I obviously need to take better advantage of what control I do have!!! Hi. Dave W7AQK ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by w7aqk
On 2015-03-19 12:59 PM, dyarnes wrote: > Anyway, it was sort of a "slap your forehead" moment here! Hi. Time > for me to read, or re-read, how to properly take advantage of AGC! First thing to to do is get out your XG-2 or XG-3 and run the RF gain calibration on the K3. If the gain cal is off, the AGC may activate well before the signal has a chance to quiet the noise. Sherwood had that experience when he tested a K3 with the new synthesizers that had not had the RF Gain Calibration performed before it left the Elecraft factory. 73, ... Joe, W4TV ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by w7aqk
Dave,
Yes, AGC settings can 'enhance' the receiver noise if set incorrectly. When testing AGC setting, listen not for the signals themselves, but to the pauses in the signals. For more guidance on choosing the right AGC settings for your condition, check out the "Noisy K3" article on my website www.w3fpr.com. 73, Don W3FPR On 3/19/2015 12:59 PM, dyarnes wrote: > The recent combination of QSB and higher noise were BOTH much improved > by just turning the AGC off. The noise went down considerably!!! > That improved everything, and copy became 100%, or close to it! I > don't know why I didn't think to do this sooner! Anyway, I am > guessing that the AGC is enhancing the noise, and it has nothing to do > with the K3 itself as to any oddity. Somebody can probably explain > this anomaly better to me. I always have to be very careful when > turning the AGC off, especially if I am wearing "cans", but it sure > does make a big difference on weaker signals. > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by w7aqk
Dave,
That's good advice. I usually keep my AGC THR set to about 18. However, the higher the threshold, the closer the dynamic range approaches that of no AGC, but without the danger of overload or hitting the limiter that will protect your hearing. If that isn't to your liking try dropping it down to the mid to lower teens. Also -- don't overlook something as easy as simply reducing your RF Gain control. As you first begin to reduce it, the results are virtually identical to what you'll get by raising the ACG THR level -- and it's right there on the front panel. You may find that's all you need. 73, Dale WA8SRA > Hi again, > > I got several very nice responses to my question already, and it seems I > need to do some adjusting. My AGC threshold was set at 5, which > apparently > is too low. I've also increased by AGC slope setting as well. I'll have > to > check all this out with some weaker signals to see just how much > difference > that might have made. Apparently I need to pay a lot more attention to > these settings, and may have to adjust them more often depending on > conditions, etc. It was also suggested I set these adjustments up in a > memory position, which makes a great deal of sense. The K3's AGC seems to > work very well, and I just need to take advantage of the fact that it can > be > adjusted a lot to accommodate different conditions. > > Thanks for the advice folks, and I welcome any other suggestions as well. > With my modest antennas I have to dig signals out of the noise quite > often, > so I obviously need to take better advantage of what control I do have!!! > Hi. > > Dave W7AQK ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by w7aqk
Hi Dave,
Here is an easy test to see what THR level you should use. First, set the SLP to 15. That will give the most AGC action -- all signal strengths will sound about the same. You might want to do this if you are listening to a round table of differing strength signals. I keep my SLP = 0, to allow me to distinguish between strong and weak signal in a contest situation. Next, choose a noisy band or the band that you want to set the AGC THR. It very well could be different on different noisy bands. Now, while listening to the noise, decrease the THR until you hear a decrease in noise. You could also use the AFV and dBV measurements but that is a bit trickier. If it were me, I'd set the THR a little higher than where it starts to be activated by the noise. Actually, I like to run THR pretty high because I like to operate the receiver in a linear region to distinguish different strength signals. Sometimes, though, I run the THR down a bit when there are a bunch of weak signals, like EUs calling, in addition to a bunch of strong US stations. Then having the AGC clip the stronger signals lets me run the AF or RF gain up to be able to hear the weaker EUs without blasting my ears with the stronger stations. The bottom line is that there is tremendous flexibility in setting up the AGC and one size doesn't fit all. Cheers and 73, Fred KE7X Author of: "The Elecraft K3: Design, Configuration and Operation 2nd ed" "The Elecraft KX3 - Going for the summit" "The Elecraft KPA500 and KAT500 - the K-Line Dream Station" Printed, coil bound copies of these are all available at www.elecraft.com KPA500 and KAT500 Quick Set Up Guide http://www.ke7x.com/home/k-line-introduction-and-set-up-guide KAT500 and KXPA500 Tuner Operation http://www.ke7x.com/home/kat500-and-kxpa100-tuners ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
