Amateur Radio Parity Act
Locked
 
|
How many of you have seen this on current antenna bills before Congress? <http://www.kkn.net/%7En6tv/Just_Say_No_to_S.1534_v4.pdf> Terry, KQ5U ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
|
On 8/9/2017 7:31 PM, Terry wrote:
> How many of you have seen this on current antenna bills before Congress? > > <http://www.kkn.net/%7En6tv/Just_Say_No_to_S.1534_v4.pdf> I have. The author, K1VR, is probably the best, most experienced and most respected attorney specializing in legal issues associated with antenna zoning and permitting. As such, he's seen all of the tricks and "gotchas" that can be thrown at you. KE1B, also an attorney, posted to a local club reflector strongly endorsing Fred's analysis of the bill. I attempted to post it to the CQ-Contest reflector and it disappeared into the great bit bucket. 73, Jim K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
|
In reply to this post by Terry Myers
Probably should add this to keep both sides in the picture.
http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Regulatory/The%20Amateur%20Radio%20Parity%20Act%20FAQ.pdf 73s and thanks, Dave NK7Z http://www.nk7z.net On 08/09/2017 07:31 PM, Terry wrote: > > How many of you have seen this on current antenna bills before Congress? > > <http://www.kkn.net/%7En6tv/Just_Say_No_to_S.1534_v4.pdf> > > > > Terry, KQ5U > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
|
Note that K1VR goes through this with a fine toothed comb, showing both
its inaccuracies and exposing serious problems with the Bill itself. Although I have no legal training beyond the English language, I find K1VR's analysis compelling. 73, Jim K9YC On 8/9/2017 10:21 PM, Dave Cole wrote: > robably should add this to keep both sides in the picture. > > http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Regulatory/The%20Amateur%20Radio%20Parity%20Act%20FAQ.pdf > > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
Re: Amateur Radio Parity Act
|
|
Thanks to all having brought this up!!
I already, based the ARRL President's email, sent my endorsement to my Senators. Geez, between working overseas, trying to keep in touch with my state and city issues and elections - I guess I just sent my endorsement out for the bill based only on ARRL recommendation. Mea Culpa! However, our ARRL has for the most part always done smart things - from my view. It is not easy making everyone happy, all the time. In fact the ARRL is us -- just like government, we elect our reps. Having said that -- is this a "all or none" game? Could this bill be a footstep into future legislation, e.g. with some/all of the the valid issues that K1VR brings up to be addressed? Best Regards, ErwinN7EAH From: Jim Brown <[hidden email]> To: [hidden email] Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 10:02 AM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Amateur Radio Parity Act Note that K1VR goes through this with a fine toothed comb, showing both its inaccuracies and exposing serious problems with the Bill itself. Although I have no legal training beyond the English language, I find K1VR's analysis compelling. 73, Jim K9YC On 8/9/2017 10:21 PM, Dave Cole wrote: > robably should add this to keep both sides in the picture. > > http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Regulatory/The%20Amateur%20Radio%20Parity%20Act%20FAQ.pdf > > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
|
Excellent read that was written by an expert. A true example of giving
with the big words (chest banging sound bytes etc.) and rhetoric - while taking away in the fine print. Written by contractual charlatans selling snake oil. I can see challenges lingering in the courts until the effected hams die of old age. Bill W2BLC K-Line -- Many of life's problems can be solved by simply deciding what we can do without. - John Dolan ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
|
In reply to this post by Elecraft mailing list
A differing view:
Having benefited greatly by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 in my former professional life, I doubt that the HOA, POA or COA (X owners associations) have been asleep at the wheel in dealing with antenna issues since then! Senator Nelsen's defeat of this bill last year for Florida shows just how powerful the (?) Owners Associations lobbying can be. My sense in reading the bill is that it may be the best compromise available. There had to been much mashing of teeth at ARRL for some of the wording. If the bill becomes law then we need to be very pro-active with the FCC during the comment period. The implementing of the law is up to the FCC and the "devil is in the details" of that implementing. If you ever read the FCC's Telecommunications Act primer, the FCC left the Associations very little wiggle room. I doubt Amateur Radio can ever fare as well. Hopefully Mr. Imlay at ARRL will keep us informed on that issue & how best to proceed. 73 George AI4VZ ---------------------------------------------------- Note that K1VR goes through this with a fine toothed comb, showing both its inaccuracies and exposing serious problems with the Bill itself. Although I have no legal training beyond the English language, I find K1VR's analysis compelling. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
|
The HOA lobby is good - they got exactly the wording they wanted in this
bill and they got the ARRL to support it. It is not a compromise - it gives the HOA complete discretion and control. My HOA defined reasonable as follows: "A telescoping mast, 30 feet tall when extended, painted sky blue, must remain fully retracted from 2 hours before local sunrise until two hours after local sunset, and additional quiet hours may be imposed if any neighborhood residents complain of interference." This was considered a gracious compromise on their part, because "all you really need to communicate world-wide is a hand held walkie talkie." That kind of thing will be the best compromise available under this bill. If this becomes law as written there will be no more details to work, protests will fall on deaf ears, and the HOA alone will define reasonable. 73 John N5CQ -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Gmail - George Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 7:30 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Amateur Radio Parity Act A differing view: Having benefited greatly by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 in my former professional life, I doubt that the HOA, POA or COA (X owners associations) have been asleep at the wheel in dealing with antenna issues since then! Senator Nelsen's defeat of this bill last year for Florida shows just how powerful the (?) Owners Associations lobbying can be. My sense in reading the bill is that it may be the best compromise available. There had to been much mashing of teeth at ARRL for some of the wording. If the bill becomes law then we need to be very pro-active with the FCC during the comment period. The implementing of the law is up to the FCC and the "devil is in the details" of that implementing. If you ever read the FCC's Telecommunications Act primer, the FCC left the Associations very little wiggle room. I doubt Amateur Radio can ever fare as well. Hopefully Mr. Imlay at ARRL will keep us informed on that issue & how best to proceed. 73 George AI4VZ ---------------------------------------------------- Note that K1VR goes through this with a fine toothed comb, showing both its inaccuracies and exposing serious problems with the Bill itself. Although I have no legal training beyond the English language, I find K1VR's analysis compelling. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
|
In reply to this post by Elecraft mailing list
On 8/9/2017 11:12 PM, Erwin Haynes wrote:
> Having said that -- is this a "all or none" game? Could this bill be a > footstep into future legislation, e.g. with some/all of the the valid > issues that K1VR brings up to be addressed? Apparently you did not read K1VR's analysis. He offered several suggestions for crafting a Bill without those issues, but noted that, due to how the legislative process works, it is VERY unlikely that it could be improved, and that IF the Senate were to pass a bill, it would be identical to the House Bill, which has the serious flaws noted. 73, Jim K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
|
I was under the impression that this thread was CLOSED. Please respect the
list owner's wishes. 73, Alan. G4GNX -----Original Message----- From: Jim Brown Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 6:32 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Amateur Radio Parity Act Apparently you did not read K1VR's analysis...................... ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
|
On 8/10/2017 10:37 AM, G4GNX wrote:
> I was under the impression that this thread was CLOSED. Please respect > the list owner's wishes. > Note that I posted 6 hours before it was closed. And I posted again before getting to the email that closed it. FWIW, I DO consider this issue VITAL to anyone who lives in a restricted housing development, which includes a very high percentage of US hams. I'm lucky enough not to be restricted in this manner, but I know a lot of hams who are. 73, Jim K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
|
I guess I get to be the guy posting to a closed thread. ouch!
>>"FWIW, I DO consider this issue VITAL to anyone who lives in a restricted housing development, which includes a very high percentage of US hams. All of those US hams decided on their own to purchase property in the restricted area (myself included). I knew what it meant and I'm willing to 'man up' and abide by the agreement I signed at purchase to follow the rules. Running to 'daddy' after the fact and claiming it is VITAL that I be allowed to ignore the rules is not an appropriate reaction from my POV. If it is that vital don't purchase in such an area. Sometimes that can be difficult, but sometimes life is difficult. Mark AD5SS any responses by email please! On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Jim Brown <[hidden email]> wrote: > On 8/10/2017 10:37 AM, G4GNX wrote: >> >> I was under the impression that this thread was CLOSED. Please respect the >> list owner's wishes. >> > Note that I posted 6 hours before it was closed. And I posted again before > getting to the email that closed it. > > FWIW, I DO consider this issue VITAL to anyone who lives in a restricted > housing development, which includes a very high percentage of US hams. I'm > lucky enough not to be restricted in this manner, but I know a lot of hams > who are. > > 73, Jim K9YC > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
|
With due respect for those who disagree, it's not about us. I consider that
the need for a well-crafted Parity Act is NOT ours but a need of our sons and daughters and THEIR sons and daughters, few of whom are parties to the contracts to which onerous and often unconstitutionally vague and broad CC&Rs are attached. If more than 80% of the US population is barred from using truly effective HF antennas, the future of amateur radio is in doubt. As a consequence, inadequacies in our national communications infrastructure could, in the context of a disaster, multiply serious harm to lives and property. As is often the case in the political realm, we'd do well to think a great deal less about ourselves and a great deal more about others. On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Mark Bayern <[hidden email]> wrote: > I guess I get to be the guy posting to a closed thread. ouch! > > >>"FWIW, I DO consider this issue VITAL to anyone who lives in a > restricted housing development, which includes a very high percentage of US > hams. > > All of those US hams decided on their own to purchase property in the > restricted area (myself included). I knew what it meant and I'm > willing to 'man up' and abide by the agreement I signed at purchase to > follow the rules. Running to 'daddy' after the fact and claiming it is > VITAL that I be allowed to ignore the rules is not an appropriate > reaction from my POV. If it is that vital don't purchase in such an > area. Sometimes that can be difficult, but sometimes life is > difficult. > > Mark AD5SS > > any responses by email please! > > > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Jim Brown <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > On 8/10/2017 10:37 AM, G4GNX wrote: > >> > >> I was under the impression that this thread was CLOSED. Please respect > the > >> list owner's wishes. > >> > > Note that I posted 6 hours before it was closed. And I posted again > before > > getting to the email that closed it. > > > > FWIW, I DO consider this issue VITAL to anyone who lives in a restricted > > housing development, which includes a very high percentage of US hams. > I'm > > lucky enough not to be restricted in this manner, but I know a lot of > hams > > who are. > > > > 73, Jim K9YC > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > > Elecraft mailing list > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > Message delivered to [hidden email] > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] > -- Bill McCarty This message was NOT sent using my iPhone or anyone else's iPhone. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
|
I really thought this thread was closed.
Nobody outside the USA cares about your internal politicking so please just give it a rest! Let’s get back to Elecraft and leave the American Politics Stuff somewhere else. Please. Andy > On 11 Aug 2017, at 06:53, W B McCarty <[hidden email]> wrote: > > With due respect for those who disagree, it's not about us. I consider that > the need for a well-crafted Parity Act is NOT ours but a need of our sons > and daughters and THEIR sons and daughters, few of whom are parties to the > contracts to which onerous and often unconstitutionally vague and broad > CC&Rs are attached. If more than 80% of the US population is barred from > using truly effective HF antennas, the future of amateur radio is in doubt. > As a consequence, inadequacies in our national communications > infrastructure could, in the context of a disaster, multiply serious harm > to lives and property. As is often the case in the political realm, we'd do > well to think a great deal less about ourselves and a great deal more about > others. > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Mark Bayern <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> I guess I get to be the guy posting to a closed thread. ouch! >> >>>> "FWIW, I DO consider this issue VITAL to anyone who lives in a >> restricted housing development, which includes a very high percentage of US >> hams. >> >> All of those US hams decided on their own to purchase property in the >> restricted area (myself included). I knew what it meant and I'm >> willing to 'man up' and abide by the agreement I signed at purchase to >> follow the rules. Running to 'daddy' after the fact and claiming it is >> VITAL that I be allowed to ignore the rules is not an appropriate >> reaction from my POV. If it is that vital don't purchase in such an >> area. Sometimes that can be difficult, but sometimes life is >> difficult. >> >> Mark AD5SS >> >> any responses by email please! >> >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Jim Brown <[hidden email]> >> wrote: >>> On 8/10/2017 10:37 AM, G4GNX wrote: >>>> >>>> I was under the impression that this thread was CLOSED. Please respect >> the >>>> list owner's wishes. >>>> ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
|
I read the list offline, as I suppose many others do. I've carefully
re-read the received messages in the thread, several times, and I find no message from a moderator, or anyone else, instructing that the thread be closed. That said, I readily take Andy at his word that such is the case and I apologize for prolonging the unwelcome thread. Perhaps various email clients differently classify the messages that constitute a thread. Thus, what you see as a thread may differ from what I see as a thread. Or perhaps the moderator's instruction appeared in another thread, one that I have not read. I admit that I read only a small fraction of the posted messages. Oddly, I have NO idea why I happened to read this particular thread. It actually was noise returned in a search on an unrelated topic. Cheers, On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 12:52 AM, Andy McMullin <[hidden email]> wrote: > I really thought this thread was closed. > > Nobody outside the USA cares about your internal politicking so please > just give it a rest! Let’s get back to Elecraft and leave the American > Politics Stuff somewhere else. Please > -- Bill McCarty , WB6LA ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
|
In reply to this post by Andy McMullin
Andy McMullin <[hidden email]> wrote:
> I really thought this thread was closed. > > Nobody outside the USA cares about your internal politicking so please > just give it a rest! Let’s get back to Elecraft and leave the American > Politics Stuff somewhere else. Please. It is something that affects the rest of the world. Other countries have similar restrictions and may follow america to tighter (or looser) crippling of amateur radio. -- Brian D G3VGZ Yarm England ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
|
In reply to this post by Andy McMullin
Wow Andy, what a selfish response. Suppose no one in the US cared about
working people in England or couldn't because we could not put up an antenna. Obviously you wouldn't care but there are a lot of people in England that belong to clubs in the US and actively participate in events. I worked a gentleman in England that was county hunting in the US. Because you are "outside the USA" you must not care if he gets the counties he needs. It's not about " internal politicking". It's about allowing people to successfully pursue a hobby. A hobby that you obviously enjoy but since you have what you want, who cares about the rest of the world. I thought people in your country were friendly and considerate. I hope you are the exception and not the rule. By the way, it took you more time to write and send that response than it would to hit the "Delete" button (which is what I will do with your posts going forward). Dave KD9VT On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 2:52 AM, Andy McMullin <[hidden email]> wrote: > I really thought this thread was closed. > > Nobody outside the USA cares about your internal politicking so please > just give it a rest! Let’s get back to Elecraft and leave the American > Politics Stuff somewhere else. Please. > > Andy > > > > > > > > On 11 Aug 2017, at 06:53, W B McCarty <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > With due respect for those who disagree, it's not about us. I consider > that > > the need for a well-crafted Parity Act is NOT ours but a need of our sons > > and daughters and THEIR sons and daughters, few of whom are parties to > the > > contracts to which onerous and often unconstitutionally vague and broad > > CC&Rs are attached. If more than 80% of the US population is barred from > > using truly effective HF antennas, the future of amateur radio is in > doubt. > > As a consequence, inadequacies in our national communications > > infrastructure could, in the context of a disaster, multiply serious harm > > to lives and property. As is often the case in the political realm, we'd > do > > well to think a great deal less about ourselves and a great deal more > about > > others. > > > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Mark Bayern <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > >> I guess I get to be the guy posting to a closed thread. ouch! > >> > >>>> "FWIW, I DO consider this issue VITAL to anyone who lives in a > >> restricted housing development, which includes a very high percentage > of US > >> hams. > >> > >> All of those US hams decided on their own to purchase property in the > >> restricted area (myself included). I knew what it meant and I'm > >> willing to 'man up' and abide by the agreement I signed at purchase to > >> follow the rules. Running to 'daddy' after the fact and claiming it is > >> VITAL that I be allowed to ignore the rules is not an appropriate > >> reaction from my POV. If it is that vital don't purchase in such an > >> area. Sometimes that can be difficult, but sometimes life is > >> difficult. > >> > >> Mark AD5SS > >> > >> any responses by email please! > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Jim Brown <[hidden email]> > >> wrote: > >>> On 8/10/2017 10:37 AM, G4GNX wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I was under the impression that this thread was CLOSED. Please respect > >> the > >>>> list owner's wishes. > >>>> > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
Re: Amateur Radio Parity Act
|
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Jim Brown-10
'Gentlemen',
This thread was closed yesterday - in several posts by the moderator (me). Further posts on this topic will incur the wrath of the moderator. Take it off list - now. 73, Eric Moderator elecraft.com _..._ > On Aug 10, 2017, at 10:32 AM, Jim Brown <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> On 8/9/2017 11:12 PM, Erwin Haynes wrote: >> Having said that -- is this a "all or none" game? Could this bill be a footstep into future legislation, e.g. with some/all of the the valid issues that K1VR brings up to be addressed? > > Apparently you did not read K1VR's analysis. He offered several suggestions for crafting a Bill without those issues, but noted that, due to how the legislative process works, it is VERY unlikely that it could be improved, and that IF the Senate were to pass a bill, it would be identical to the House Bill, which has the serious flaws ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
Re: Amateur Radio Parity Act
|
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Dave Belville
Personal attacks and critiques of the type below are in violation of Elecraft list policy. Please cease posts of this type immediately.
Also note that this thread has been officially, and forcefully, closed. Eric Moderator elecraft.com _..._ > On Aug 11, 2017, at 6:15 AM, Dave Belville <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Wow Andy, what a selfish response. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
«
Return to Elecraft
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |