Annoying contests
Locked
 
|
Contests can be great fun (when one has time for them).
However, if I want a regular qso, I usually find even the high end of the cw bands to be too crowded in the case of major contests. I have to argue against letting contests take over the entire non-WARC bands, for one reason only: Emergency communications. Although 30m is often good for low power operation, that is not always the case, and not every portable rig covers it. Quite often in portable operation only a single band works well enough that you can make a contact with low power and a mediocre antenna; that band is very often not a WARC band. Here is an idea: Carve out a section of each non-WARC band, for a given contest, where contest operation is not allowed. It would have to be a section where most licensees are allowed to operate, in most countries. If the contest organizer receives multiple reports saying that a contest participant operated in the non-contest window, that participant would be penalized. There could be multiple windows carved out in a given contest, to satisfy different license classes and countries. The contests would be more crowded? Yes, but the non-contest windows could be small, and crowding in contests seems to drive great improvements in equipment to compensate. WARC bands deserve more use, and it would truly make sense to conduct some nets there. Flame away! 73, Erik K7TV >snip >The high end of the CW portion of the bands aren't that crowded. >And there's the WARC bands sitting there doing almost nothing!!! >snip > >Larry/K2GN - http://k2gn.com ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
|
In answer to your suggestion, there already are areas. 3.600-3.650,
7.100-7.125, 14.100-14.150, 21.100-21.150, 28.100-28.150. During even the biggest contests those areas are usually free of contesters. There are maybe 10 weekends out of 52 that major contests take place. And they always take place the same weekend of the year, year after year. That leaves 42 weekends for non contest activities. Sure there are other smaller non major contests but they do not take up the whole band but just a small portion of it. Also there are no contests during the week. I am at a loss at those that hate contests as to why their will has to be imposed upon all. Your sched on 14.050 does not have to be etched in stone. Unless you are using a really antique radio, there are things on the radio called knobs and dials. Usually the biggest one will tune your radio to other frequencies. Plan ahead. Oh Jack, I see there is a major contest next weekend. How about we meet on 30/17/12 meters? Or another day. Or, heaven forbid, we miss one. In the case of the ECN net, it is just a check in, my temp is and we got 20 inches of snow. That can also be done on a WARC band. Emergency communications in the case of major storm or earthquake or whatever is always taken into account by the contest community. If a set area in the band is set aside for the big one when it hits California, if it is a contest weekend, it WILL be avoided by the contest community. It has happened in the past and will happen again in the future. Out of all of the possible things to do in amateur radio my likes are DXing and Contesting. That doesn't mean I am going to knock SSTV guys or Satellite guys or moon bounce guys. That is what they enjoy and more power to them. Okay off my soap box. 73's Tim Herrick, KQ8M North Coast Contesters [hidden email] K3 Serial #5934 -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Erik Basilier Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 1:50 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: [Elecraft] Annoying contests Contests can be great fun (when one has time for them). However, if I want a regular qso, I usually find even the high end of the cw bands to be too crowded in the case of major contests. I have to argue against letting contests take over the entire non-WARC bands, for one reason only: Emergency communications. Although 30m is often good for low power operation, that is not always the case, and not every portable rig covers it. Quite often in portable operation only a single band works well enough that you can make a contact with low power and a mediocre antenna; that band is very often not a WARC band. Here is an idea: Carve out a section of each non-WARC band, for a given contest, where contest operation is not allowed. It would have to be a section where most licensees are allowed to operate, in most countries. If the contest organizer receives multiple reports saying that a contest participant operated in the non-contest window, that participant would be penalized. There could be multiple windows carved out in a given contest, to satisfy different license classes and countries. The contests would be more crowded? Yes, but the non-contest windows could be small, and crowding in contests seems to drive great improvements in equipment to compensate. WARC bands deserve more use, and it would truly make sense to conduct some nets there. Flame away! 73, Erik K7TV >snip >The high end of the CW portion of the bands aren't that crowded. >And there's the WARC bands sitting there doing almost nothing!!! >snip > >Larry/K2GN - http://k2gn.com ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
|
In reply to this post by K7TV
I agree, contests should not take over entire bands and should only dominate a portion of the bands.
In general, I do not enjoy operating on weekends because of so many contests. It's not that I object to the contests operating, or even operating across the bands. What bothers me is the blatant disregard for anyone else operating on the same band(s). Ken WA8JXM On Feb 20, 2012, at 1:50 PM, Erik Basilier wrote: > Here is an idea: Carve out a section of each non-WARC band, for a given > contest, where contest operation is not allowed. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
|
In reply to this post by Tim Herrick
For good reason; those are the unattended (usually Winlink 2000 Pactor or WINMOR digital stations) operation subbands, which means you're likely to get a lot of QRM from them when they start transmitting.
Matthew Pitts N8OHU (Sorry to dredge this thread up again Eric; didn't want to let the usage of these band segments go unmentioned) >________________________________ > From: KQ8M <[hidden email]> >To: [hidden email] >Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 2:33 PM >Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Annoying contests > >In answer to your suggestion, there already are areas. 3.600-3.650, >7.100-7.125, 14.100-14.150, 21.100-21.150, 28.100-28.150. During even the >biggest contests those areas are usually free of contesters. > > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
«
Return to [HAM]
|
1 view|%1 views
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |