I have been waiting for a slow reflector day to post this very low priority
message (Perhaps that day will never come!, so here goes...) but various threads keep touching on the point that I have been wanting to make, and a current K3 thread has yet again exhibited this behavior. Let's say that you're having trouble with a particular rig control/logging program. Let's say for example that it doesn't properly put the transceiver into transmit under certain conditions. If I made a suggestion such as, "The K3 already has a XMIT button that you can use to put the rig into transmit," you would probably be irritated with me because, of course, that isn't what you desire to do. You want the computer to perform that function, not a front panel button. Yet, again and again, when someone poses a particular problem or question about the operation of an Elecraft product often one or more of the responses is, "Computer program ABC can do that." Well, that may be true, but it doesn't help the original poster. The original poster probably isn't interested in finding a computer solution; he's interested in finding a solution within the rig itself. Perhaps one possible reason for this is that folks who use a computer with their rig 100% of the time assume that everybody does (or should). It is not my intent to debate this particular issue, only to point out that it's not realistic to assume this. In my opinion, we should be more sensitive to whether or not a computer solution is the right solution, and always help the poster dig down to find a real solution to his problem. Regards, Al W6LX ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
A "slow reflector day," particularly on this list does not exist in our
universe. Good point, Al. I've watched Don, W3FPR, for quite awhile. Someone posts a problem. The post might be missing some information ... OK, usually is, see my own "problem posts" for good examples. 15 responders post "solutions." Don, however, asks questions. Pretty simple engineering: "First understand that there is a problem and what it is; Then find solutions." Could cut down on list traffic some, including arithmetic lessons. 73, Fred K6DGW Auburn CA CM98lw On 11/22/2011 4:33 PM, Al Lorona wrote: > I have been waiting for a slow reflector day to post this very low priority > message ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by alorona
I agree, and would point out that there are two sides in the information exchange.
Asking the right question, couched in the correct terms is also necessary. 73, Mike NF4L On 11/22/2011 7:33 PM, Al Lorona wrote: > I have been waiting for a slow reflector day to post this very low priority > message (Perhaps that day will never come!, so here goes...) but various > threads keep touching on the point that I have been wanting to make, and a > current K3 thread has yet again exhibited this behavior. > > Let's say that you're having trouble with a particular rig control/logging > program. Let's say for example that it doesn't properly put the transceiver into > transmit under certain conditions. > > If I made a suggestion such as, "The K3 already has a XMIT button that you can > use to put the rig into transmit," you would probably be irritated with me > because, of course, that isn't what you desire to do. You want the computer to > perform that function, not a front panel button. > > Yet, again and again, when someone poses a particular problem or question about > the operation of an Elecraft product often one or more of the responses is, > "Computer program ABC can do that." Well, that may be true, but it doesn't help > the original poster. The original poster probably isn't interested in finding a > computer solution; he's interested in finding a solution within the rig itself. > > Perhaps one possible reason for this is that folks who use a computer with their > rig 100% of the time assume that everybody does (or should). It is not my intent > to debate this particular issue, only to point out that it's not realistic to > assume this. > > In my opinion, we should be more sensitive to whether or not a computer solution > is the right solution, and always help the poster dig down to find a real > solution to his problem. > > Regards, > > Al W6LX > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |