I'm about to order the K3. I have an antistatic mat that I used to build the K2 (#1760 - wow! that long ago?). Although it carries a few solder burns, it still looks to be in good condition. I wonder if I should rely on it to assemble the K3, or should I spend the 50 bucks and buy a new one? Any advice?
|
Hmmm ... before building my K3 (just finished), I bought a wrist strap
and mat from Cables Unlimited at under $25 for both. Aside from cables that are a little too short, them seem fine So long as there is a wire with a 1-megohm resistor between a conductive mat surface and common ground, what is to distinguish a "good" mat from one that won't really provide the protection? 73, Pete N4ZR The World Contest Station Database, updated daily at www.conteststations.com The Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net, blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com On 6/2/2010 6:22 PM, Bill Myers wrote: > I'm about to order the K3. I have an antistatic mat that I used to build the > K2 (#1760 - wow! that long ago?). Although it carries a few solder burns, > it still looks to be in good condition. I wonder if I should rely on it to > assemble the K3, or should I spend the 50 bucks and buy a new one? Any > advice? > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Bill Myers
Thu Jun 3 06:05:49 EDT Pete Smith (N4ZR) wrote ...
"... what is to distinguish a "good" mat from one that won't really provide the protection?" -- Hi Pete, A complete answer to your question will depend on the relative humidity and on the susceptibility to ESD damage of the devices being handled. FYI, the industry rates ESD sensitive devices into three classes based on their susceptibility to damage: o ESD Class 1 -- below 2,000 V o ESD Class 2 -- 2,000 V to 4,000 V o ESD Class 3 -- 4,000 V to 16,000 V o Not ESD Sensitive -- above 16,000 V Keep in mind that (WITH PROPER HANDLING) a sub-assembly may offer some protection to the individual devices that comprise it, such that the overall sub-assembly can withstand higher discharge voltages than the most sensitive components that comprise it. This makes perfect sense since the highest level assembly, i.e. a completed K3, is (generally) not ESD sensitive! --- - - - --- I also mentioned relative humidity in my opening sentence. FYI, at the aerospace manufacturing facility (where I worked for ten years) even our "good" mats were only adequate when the relative humidity was above 30%. Below 30% RH "air ionizers" were also required at ESD work stations. These devices aren't something you'll want to consider as they cost upwards of $500! Oh, and they only "protect" a very small area, i.e. just a couple square feet of work surface at most. That said, perhaps Elecraft would consider using them in Aptos as an additional layer of protection? --- - - - --- In light of the above details, the best answer I can offer is that there is an industry specification for the surface resistance of an ESD mat, which is specified in the unusual unit "Ohms per square". Alan Bloom addressed this subject in early April of this year. Please refer to his post in the archives at http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/elecraft/2010-April/127988.html 73, Gary KI4GGX K2 #4067 K3 #2724 ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |