I've done a good portion of building a K2, and completely built a K1...
But amazingly enough I've never solder terminated a coax link... I guess I've always preferred the look of professionally terminated cabling. But now I need a few simple short patch cables. In the shack I have a decent amount 60+ foot or so of RG58/U and then around 120 foot or so of RG58/AU... Pretty much seems about to be the same stuff with one stranded center and the other solid center conductor. I feel for HF use this coax should be ample for a few 18" patches... Anyone disagree? I may end up using these for VHF as well but doubtful I'd do much of anything over 150Mhz. I'm not married to using the cordage that I have on hand but it would be nice to be able to use that stuff.... If there is something that would fit better feel free to advise. (I've always been a fan of RG-8x for HAM use and I use RG-217 or better at work always but like I said I'm not terminating those myself...) I've attempted to do this with PL-259 connectors before and was unsuccessful (but I tried to use a less than optimal soldering iron and it took too long to get things hot and I ended up with a short in the end). I've now bought an adequate dual temp weller gun and should have better success. So I guess for the next real question where would one recommend to get PL-259 and BNC connectors for this job. Should I go for solder on or crimp on? I'm more than willing to spend the money for a good crimp tool if need be and its a better option. Anyway I'm open to recommendations as to where one should procure the connectors as well as any tips, tricks, and opinions on what I should use (so long as the opinions come with explanations). ;) Thanks kindly gentlemen. ~Brett (KC7OTG) ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Buy a crimp tool and use crimp connectors.
Two types of crimp connectors are available, single crimp and double crimp. Single crimp uses a solder-in center pin and crimp shield and the double crimp version crimps both the center pin and the braid. I have a slight preference for double crimp, but either are acceptable. For connectors and crimp tools, you might look at The RF Connection in Gaitherburg MD. It's owned by a ham, and I've found them good to deal with. http://www.therfc.com/ is their web site. Jack K8ZOA On 1/28/2010 1:35 AM, Brett Howard wrote: > I've done a good portion of building a K2, and completely built a K1... > But amazingly enough I've never solder terminated a coax link... I > guess I've always preferred the look of professionally terminated > cabling. But now I need a few simple short patch cables. In the shack > I have a decent amount 60+ foot or so of RG58/U and then around 120 foot > or so of RG58/AU... Pretty much seems about to be the same stuff with > one stranded center and the other solid center conductor. I feel for HF > use this coax should be ample for a few 18" patches... Anyone disagree? > I may end up using these for VHF as well but doubtful I'd do much of > anything over 150Mhz. I'm not married to using the cordage that I have > on hand but it would be nice to be able to use that stuff.... If there > is something that would fit better feel free to advise. (I've always > been a fan of RG-8x for HAM use and I use RG-217 or better at work > always but like I said I'm not terminating those myself...) > > I've attempted to do this with PL-259 connectors before and was > unsuccessful (but I tried to use a less than optimal soldering iron and > it took too long to get things hot and I ended up with a short in the > end). I've now bought an adequate dual temp weller gun and should have > better success. > > So I guess for the next real question where would one recommend to get > PL-259 and BNC connectors for this job. Should I go for solder on or > crimp on? I'm more than willing to spend the money for a good crimp > tool if need be and its a better option. > > Anyway I'm open to recommendations as to where one should procure the > connectors as well as any tips, tricks, and opinions on what I should > use (so long as the opinions come with explanations). ;) > > Thanks kindly gentlemen. > > ~Brett (KC7OTG) > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
> So I guess for the next real question where would one recommend to get
> PL-259 and BNC connectors for this job. I'm with Jack on the use of double-crimp connectors for an inside installations. I tend to use soldered connectors outdoors although with the right sealant (e.g., Scotchkote) together with heat-shrink tubing, I imagine that crimped connectors can also hold up to weather extremes. RF Industries is my primary supplier of crimped connectors, mostly purchased through Tessco. http://www.tessco.com/ If you set up an on-line commercial account with them, typical small quantity pricing is very reasonable. > I've attempted to do this with PL-259 connectors before and was > unsuccessful (but I tried to use a less than optimal soldering iron and I rarely recommend alternative installation methods to that provided by a manufacturer, but if you attempt to use soldered PL-259s with a "UG" reducer, this method sets the standard in my opinion: http://www.w5fc.org/files/how-to/PL259.PDF It's not a novel idea, but there are several benefits to the use of this method. The primary benefit is that the quality of the braided portion of the installation can be inspected prior to insertion into the PL-259 body. The method recommended by Amphenol over the past several decades leaves the user with no true way of knowing about the quality of the job. You "hope" that the job was completed correctly and that no further damage occurs after filling in the four circular PL-259 openings with solder. A multimeter can be used to detect for obvious shorts, but "ragged-edge" problems can go undetected. When using silver-plated UG reducers and a vise, it's possible to complete a PL-259 connector in under two minutes. I use a Weller soldering station set to 750-degrees F and with silver-plated PL-259 bodies and UG reducers, there's ample heat for the job and there's no fight to work the flow of solder. At the conclusion, you'll have confidence that the job was completed accurately. When I first tried this method, I honestly could not stop making jumper cables. What I had painfully tried to do for the past 35 years instantly became a pleasant experience. In a half hour, must have made close to a dozen cables using RG-400. The installation goes very fast when placing the coax vertically in a vise. The reducer goes on next and you have a perfect platform to complete the soldering of the braid on to the edge of the reducer. Paul, W9AC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Brett Howard
Bret,
Look at the cost of small quantities of decent BNC connectors. Then look at the price of prefab cables. You'll find that buying prefab stuff is cheaper. Add in the cost of a crimper tool and prefab's are the way to go. The break even point is probably several hundred. 73 de Brian/K3KO P.S. I generally hate buying prefab cables because "hams should make their own cables" in my opinion. However hams are alwayS out to save money so $$ rule the roost. What galls me is the $20 to $50 price tag on prefab cables for rigs to anything. Invest in a soldering iron, perhaps a $3 set of binocular vision goggles, some solder and do it your self. Brett Howard wrote: > I've done a good portion of building a K2, and completely built a K1... > But amazingly enough I've never solder terminated a coax link... I > guess I've always preferred the look of professionally terminated > cabling. But now I need a few simple short patch cables. In the shack > I have a decent amount 60+ foot or so of RG58/U and then around 120 foot > or so of RG58/AU... Pretty much seems about to be the same stuff with > one stranded center and the other solid center conductor. I feel for HF > use this coax should be ample for a few 18" patches... Anyone disagree? > I may end up using these for VHF as well but doubtful I'd do much of > anything over 150Mhz. I'm not married to using the cordage that I have > on hand but it would be nice to be able to use that stuff.... If there > is something that would fit better feel free to advise. (I've always > been a fan of RG-8x for HAM use and I use RG-217 or better at work > always but like I said I'm not terminating those myself...) > > I've attempted to do this with PL-259 connectors before and was > unsuccessful (but I tried to use a less than optimal soldering iron and > it took too long to get things hot and I ended up with a short in the > end). I've now bought an adequate dual temp weller gun and should have > better success. > > So I guess for the next real question where would one recommend to get > PL-259 and BNC connectors for this job. Should I go for solder on or > crimp on? I'm more than willing to spend the money for a good crimp > tool if need be and its a better option. > > Anyway I'm open to recommendations as to where one should procure the > connectors as well as any tips, tricks, and opinions on what I should > use (so long as the opinions come with explanations). ;) > > Thanks kindly gentlemen. > > ~Brett (KC7OTG) > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Brett Howard
Hi all,
I have made a coax connector tutorial and have it on my server at: http://tinyurl.com/ydhoeyr I also have an Anderson Powerpole connector tutorial at: http://tinyurl.com/y9knmrr Both have lots of info and photos. 72, Steve, W2MY ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by P.B. Christensen
Further comments to Paul's post.
Crimp connectors (double crimp preferred) are a whole lot easier, more reliable and faster to do - but stick with brand name connectors and the proper crimp tool. I've used Amphenol for many years (easily available in Toronto) but I'm sure there are others as well. I've also been using the method outlined in W5FC's document for years without any problems - just one further comment. Once you have soldered the cable braid to the end of the adapter / reducer, trimmed the insulation on the center conductor and screwed it onto the PL-259 housing you only need to solder the center conductor. If you tighten the reducer onto the PL-259 housing with vice grips it will not come apart and there is no need to solder the adapter to the housing or try to fill the four circular holes with solder. One other comment re BNC connectors - if you use a single crimp connector and need to solder the center conductor (use cable with a stranded center conducor) use a small temp controlled soldering iron for the job. It's not a job for a soldering gun! 73, Doug VE3MV email [hidden email] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Christensen" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 6:38 AM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] BNC Connectors >> So I guess for the next real question where would one recommend to get >> PL-259 and BNC connectors for this job. > > I'm with Jack on the use of double-crimp connectors for an inside > installations. I tend to use soldered connectors outdoors although with > the > right sealant (e.g., Scotchkote) together with heat-shrink tubing, I > imagine > that crimped connectors can also hold up to weather extremes. > > RF Industries is my primary supplier of crimped connectors, mostly > purchased > through Tessco. http://www.tessco.com/ If you set up an on-line > commercial > account with them, typical small quantity pricing is very reasonable. > >> I've attempted to do this with PL-259 connectors before and was >> unsuccessful (but I tried to use a less than optimal soldering iron and > > I rarely recommend alternative installation methods to that provided by a > manufacturer, but if you attempt to use soldered PL-259s with a "UG" > reducer, this method sets the standard in my opinion: > > http://www.w5fc.org/files/how-to/PL259.PDF > > It's not a novel idea, but there are several benefits to the use of this > method. The primary benefit is that the quality of the braided portion of > the installation can be inspected prior to insertion into the PL-259 body. > The method recommended by Amphenol over the past several decades leaves > the > user with no true way of knowing about the quality of the job. You "hope" > that the job was completed correctly and that no further damage occurs > after > filling in the four circular PL-259 openings with solder. A multimeter > can > be used to detect for obvious shorts, but "ragged-edge" problems can go > undetected. > > When using silver-plated UG reducers and a vise, it's possible to complete > a > PL-259 connector in under two minutes. I use a Weller soldering station > set > to 750-degrees F and with silver-plated PL-259 bodies and UG reducers, > there's ample heat for the job and there's no fight to work the flow of > solder. At the conclusion, you'll have confidence that the job was > completed accurately. > > When I first tried this method, I honestly could not stop making jumper > cables. What I had painfully tried to do for the past 35 years instantly > became a pleasant experience. In a half hour, must have made close to a > dozen cables using RG-400. The installation goes very fast when placing > the > coax vertically in a vise. The reducer goes on next and you have a > perfect > platform to complete the soldering of the braid on to the edge of the > reducer. > > Paul, W9AC > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by alsopb
There are prefab cables and then again there are prefab cables.
A few years ago, I was given a couple of boxes of BNC jumper cables, new, intended for computer to network jumpers. RG-58 size cable, molded on boots. After several of these proved less than reliable, I cut several apart. The cable is built like audio cables, thin foil shield and a small amount of wire shield. The connectors were off-size and did not always fit a MIL-spec BNC female connector. And one of the reasons the cables failed was the shell came apart. On the other hand, I have some military surplus BNC jumper cables that are excellent, made with double shielded cable, silver plated BNCs, etc. A ratcheting crimp tool and a set of commonly used jaws from RF Parts will run well over $100, but a similar quality tool from The RF Connection is less than half that. I have ratcheting tools from both sources and can't see much difference in quality. If you only need one tool, the RF Connection version is about $35, with jaws. When it comes to connectors, a similar option is available. You can get cheap Chinese crimp BNC connectors for about a buck each. You can also get (Amphenol RX series) a higher quality connector, made in either Mexico or China, for a bit more money, or you can go full up on a silver plated MIL-spec style connector. Jack K8ZOA On 1/28/2010 8:23 AM, Brian Alsop wrote: > Bret, > Look at the cost of small quantities of decent BNC connectors. > Then look at the price of prefab cables. You'll find that buying prefab > stuff is cheaper. Add in the cost of a crimper tool and prefab's are the > way to go. > > The break even point is probably several hundred. > > 73 de Brian/K3KO > > P.S. I generally hate buying prefab cables because "hams should make > their own cables" in my opinion. However hams are alwayS out to save > money so $$ rule the roost. What galls me is the $20 to $50 price tag > on prefab cables for rigs to anything. Invest in a soldering iron, > perhaps a $3 set of binocular vision goggles, some solder and do it your > self. > > Brett Howard wrote: > >> I've done a good portion of building a K2, and completely built a K1... >> But amazingly enough I've never solder terminated a coax link... I >> guess I've always preferred the look of professionally terminated >> cabling. But now I need a few simple short patch cables. In the shack >> I have a decent amount 60+ foot or so of RG58/U and then around 120 foot >> or so of RG58/AU... Pretty much seems about to be the same stuff with >> one stranded center and the other solid center conductor. I feel for HF >> use this coax should be ample for a few 18" patches... Anyone disagree? >> I may end up using these for VHF as well but doubtful I'd do much of >> anything over 150Mhz. I'm not married to using the cordage that I have >> on hand but it would be nice to be able to use that stuff.... If there >> is something that would fit better feel free to advise. (I've always >> been a fan of RG-8x for HAM use and I use RG-217 or better at work >> always but like I said I'm not terminating those myself...) >> >> I've attempted to do this with PL-259 connectors before and was >> unsuccessful (but I tried to use a less than optimal soldering iron and >> it took too long to get things hot and I ended up with a short in the >> end). I've now bought an adequate dual temp weller gun and should have >> better success. >> >> So I guess for the next real question where would one recommend to get >> PL-259 and BNC connectors for this job. Should I go for solder on or >> crimp on? I'm more than willing to spend the money for a good crimp >> tool if need be and its a better option. >> >> Anyway I'm open to recommendations as to where one should procure the >> connectors as well as any tips, tricks, and opinions on what I should >> use (so long as the opinions come with explanations). ;) >> >> Thanks kindly gentlemen. >> >> ~Brett (KC7OTG) >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[hidden email] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> >> > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
That should be "RFX" series, not "RX" series. It identifies Amphenol's
"commercial grade" line. Jack On 1/28/2010 8:51 AM, Jack Smith wrote: > There are prefab cables and then again there are prefab cables. > > A few years ago, I was given a couple of boxes of BNC jumper cables, > new, intended for computer to network jumpers. RG-58 size cable, molded > on boots. > > After several of these proved less than reliable, I cut several apart. > The cable is built like audio cables, thin foil shield and a small > amount of wire shield. The connectors were off-size and did not always > fit a MIL-spec BNC female connector. And one of the reasons the cables > failed was the shell came apart. > > On the other hand, I have some military surplus BNC jumper cables that > are excellent, made with double shielded cable, silver plated BNCs, etc. > > A ratcheting crimp tool and a set of commonly used jaws from RF Parts > will run well over $100, but a similar quality tool from The RF > Connection is less than half that. I have ratcheting tools from both > sources and can't see much difference in quality. If you only need one > tool, the RF Connection version is about $35, with jaws. > > When it comes to connectors, a similar option is available. You can get > cheap Chinese crimp BNC connectors for about a buck each. You can also > get (Amphenol RX series) a higher quality connector, made in either > Mexico or China, for a bit more money, or you can go full up on a silver > plated MIL-spec style connector. > > Jack K8ZOA > > > On 1/28/2010 8:23 AM, Brian Alsop wrote: > >> Bret, >> Look at the cost of small quantities of decent BNC connectors. >> Then look at the price of prefab cables. You'll find that buying prefab >> stuff is cheaper. Add in the cost of a crimper tool and prefab's are the >> way to go. >> >> The break even point is probably several hundred. >> >> 73 de Brian/K3KO >> >> P.S. I generally hate buying prefab cables because "hams should make >> their own cables" in my opinion. However hams are alwayS out to save >> money so $$ rule the roost. What galls me is the $20 to $50 price tag >> on prefab cables for rigs to anything. Invest in a soldering iron, >> perhaps a $3 set of binocular vision goggles, some solder and do it your >> self. >> >> Brett Howard wrote: >> >> >>> I've done a good portion of building a K2, and completely built a K1... >>> But amazingly enough I've never solder terminated a coax link... I >>> guess I've always preferred the look of professionally terminated >>> cabling. But now I need a few simple short patch cables. In the shack >>> I have a decent amount 60+ foot or so of RG58/U and then around 120 foot >>> or so of RG58/AU... Pretty much seems about to be the same stuff with >>> one stranded center and the other solid center conductor. I feel for HF >>> use this coax should be ample for a few 18" patches... Anyone disagree? >>> I may end up using these for VHF as well but doubtful I'd do much of >>> anything over 150Mhz. I'm not married to using the cordage that I have >>> on hand but it would be nice to be able to use that stuff.... If there >>> is something that would fit better feel free to advise. (I've always >>> been a fan of RG-8x for HAM use and I use RG-217 or better at work >>> always but like I said I'm not terminating those myself...) >>> >>> I've attempted to do this with PL-259 connectors before and was >>> unsuccessful (but I tried to use a less than optimal soldering iron and >>> it took too long to get things hot and I ended up with a short in the >>> end). I've now bought an adequate dual temp weller gun and should have >>> better success. >>> >>> So I guess for the next real question where would one recommend to get >>> PL-259 and BNC connectors for this job. Should I go for solder on or >>> crimp on? I'm more than willing to spend the money for a good crimp >>> tool if need be and its a better option. >>> >>> Anyway I'm open to recommendations as to where one should procure the >>> connectors as well as any tips, tricks, and opinions on what I should >>> use (so long as the opinions come with explanations). ;) >>> >>> Thanks kindly gentlemen. >>> >>> ~Brett (KC7OTG) >>> >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Elecraft mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:[hidden email] >>> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>> >>> >>> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[hidden email] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> >> >> > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Steven Pituch-3
Good pdf on APP's - I've been using them a long time and everything I have 12v is APP if possible.
Even going to use them for other stuff - control lines etc. 73 de M0XDF, K3 #174 -- The trees that are slow to grow bear the best fruit. -Moliere, actor and playwright (1622-1673) On 28 Jan 2010, at 13:47, Steven Pituch wrote: > Hi all, > > I have made a coax connector tutorial and have it on my server at: > > http://tinyurl.com/ydhoeyr > > I also have an Anderson Powerpole connector tutorial at: > > http://tinyurl.com/y9knmrr > > Both have lots of info and photos. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by alsopb
Ok I think I'm going to go both routes... I used a house I've used for
work before onlinecables.com and I've ordered 3 cables. 2 cables at 72" with a male BNC and a PL259 using RG223/U and one cable using 72" of RG223 with male BNC's on both ends. (I could have ordered the BNC to BNC cable from someone else cheaper (as its a standard cable) but since onlinecables.com adds $30 to orders under $100 I figured I'd just add it all onto them. I figure I can use these cables as a gold standard and see if I can get close to them. The BNC to PL259 cable was $43.84 each and the BNC to BNC cable was $40.04. I've seen the Pomona prefab cables (using the same RG223/U for around 30 to 32 dollars but like I said I had to get over $100 bucks to not spend an extra $30 charge). Ok now that being said I think tonight (and this weekend) I'm going to start researching what connectors and crimp tools I want to buy. I noticed that not many speak of the crimp on PL259's so perhaps I'll stay away from those... When I build my cables I'll probably not use the double shielded RG223 stuff so it won't be a fair comparison but I'll take the patch cables and see what difference I can see on a network analyzer... I can take a look up to about 26Ghz so I'm sure at some point in time there will be a major difference between my cables and those build by the pros! I appreciate all of the references gentlemen and I ensure you I'll read every word of the material put in front of me... For now I need to get my butt into work and get the materials printed out for my design review... Its my day in the barrel today. But I'm fairly confident about this design so I don't think I'll be raked over the coals too terribly bad! ;) Again thanks for your input gentlemen you're all very helpful elmers! ~Brett (KC7OTG) On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 13:23 +0000, Brian Alsop wrote: > Bret, > Look at the cost of small quantities of decent BNC connectors. > Then look at the price of prefab cables. You'll find that buying prefab > stuff is cheaper. Add in the cost of a crimper tool and prefab's are the > way to go. > > The break even point is probably several hundred. > > 73 de Brian/K3KO > > P.S. I generally hate buying prefab cables because "hams should make > their own cables" in my opinion. However hams are alwayS out to save > money so $$ rule the roost. What galls me is the $20 to $50 price tag > on prefab cables for rigs to anything. Invest in a soldering iron, > perhaps a $3 set of binocular vision goggles, some solder and do it your > self. > > Brett Howard wrote: > > I've done a good portion of building a K2, and completely built a K1... > > But amazingly enough I've never solder terminated a coax link... I > > guess I've always preferred the look of professionally terminated > > cabling. But now I need a few simple short patch cables. In the shack > > I have a decent amount 60+ foot or so of RG58/U and then around 120 foot > > or so of RG58/AU... Pretty much seems about to be the same stuff with > > one stranded center and the other solid center conductor. I feel for HF > > use this coax should be ample for a few 18" patches... Anyone disagree? > > I may end up using these for VHF as well but doubtful I'd do much of > > anything over 150Mhz. I'm not married to using the cordage that I have > > on hand but it would be nice to be able to use that stuff.... If there > > is something that would fit better feel free to advise. (I've always > > been a fan of RG-8x for HAM use and I use RG-217 or better at work > > always but like I said I'm not terminating those myself...) > > > > I've attempted to do this with PL-259 connectors before and was > > unsuccessful (but I tried to use a less than optimal soldering iron and > > it took too long to get things hot and I ended up with a short in the > > end). I've now bought an adequate dual temp weller gun and should have > > better success. > > > > So I guess for the next real question where would one recommend to get > > PL-259 and BNC connectors for this job. Should I go for solder on or > > crimp on? I'm more than willing to spend the money for a good crimp > > tool if need be and its a better option. > > > > Anyway I'm open to recommendations as to where one should procure the > > connectors as well as any tips, tricks, and opinions on what I should > > use (so long as the opinions come with explanations). ;) > > > > Thanks kindly gentlemen. > > > > ~Brett (KC7OTG) > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > > Elecraft mailing list > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by P.B. Christensen
Paul Christensen wrote:
> I rarely recommend alternative installation methods to that provided by a > manufacturer, but if you attempt to use soldered PL-259s with a "UG" > reducer, this method sets the standard in my opinion: > > http://www.w5fc.org/files/how-to/PL259.PDF I have to agree that this is a life-changing improvement in making cables! I've been doing it this way for years with no problems. An advantage which Paul didn't mention is that it's easy to remove the connector and re-use it. -- 73, Vic, K2VCO Fresno CA http://www.qsl.net/k2vco ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Brett Howard
I don't use many PL259 connectors these days, but when I do, it is a
double crimp version, silver plated from RF Industries if I recall correctly. Those install like a charm in a matter of a minute or less. (I also have a special tool that strips the jacket, braid and center conductor to the correct length, all at one time.) Be careful with RG-223 connectors - RG-223 looks like it's the same diameter as RG-58, but it's not. RG-58 has an OD of 0.195 inches and RG-223 is 0.212 inches and the crimp connector ferrule sized for RG58 will either be an incredibly tight fit over the RG223 jacket or it won't fit at all. (Don't ask me how I know this.) Jack On 1/28/2010 11:28 AM, Brett Howard wrote: > Ok I think I'm going to go both routes... I used a house I've used for > work before onlinecables.com and I've ordered 3 cables. 2 cables at 72" > with a male BNC and a PL259 using RG223/U and one cable using 72" of > RG223 with male BNC's on both ends. (I could have ordered the BNC to > BNC cable from someone else cheaper (as its a standard cable) but since > onlinecables.com adds $30 to orders under $100 I figured I'd just add it > all onto them. > > I figure I can use these cables as a gold standard and see if I can get > close to them. The BNC to PL259 cable was $43.84 each and the BNC to > BNC cable was $40.04. I've seen the Pomona prefab cables (using the > same RG223/U for around 30 to 32 dollars but like I said I had to get > over $100 bucks to not spend an extra $30 charge). > > Ok now that being said I think tonight (and this weekend) I'm going to > start researching what connectors and crimp tools I want to buy. I > noticed that not many speak of the crimp on PL259's so perhaps I'll stay > away from those... When I build my cables I'll probably not use the > double shielded RG223 stuff so it won't be a fair comparison but I'll > take the patch cables and see what difference I can see on a network > analyzer... I can take a look up to about 26Ghz so I'm sure at some > point in time there will be a major difference between my cables and > those build by the pros! > > I appreciate all of the references gentlemen and I ensure you I'll read > every word of the material put in front of me... For now I need to get > my butt into work and get the materials printed out for my design > review... Its my day in the barrel today. But I'm fairly confident > about this design so I don't think I'll be raked over the coals too > terribly bad! ;) > > Again thanks for your input gentlemen you're all very helpful elmers! > > ~Brett (KC7OTG) > > On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 13:23 +0000, Brian Alsop wrote: > >> Bret, >> Look at the cost of small quantities of decent BNC connectors. >> Then look at the price of prefab cables. You'll find that buying prefab >> stuff is cheaper. Add in the cost of a crimper tool and prefab's are the >> way to go. >> >> The break even point is probably several hundred. >> >> 73 de Brian/K3KO >> >> P.S. I generally hate buying prefab cables because "hams should make >> their own cables" in my opinion. However hams are alwayS out to save >> money so $$ rule the roost. What galls me is the $20 to $50 price tag >> on prefab cables for rigs to anything. Invest in a soldering iron, >> perhaps a $3 set of binocular vision goggles, some solder and do it your >> self. >> >> Brett Howard wrote: >> >>> I've done a good portion of building a K2, and completely built a K1... >>> But amazingly enough I've never solder terminated a coax link... I >>> guess I've always preferred the look of professionally terminated >>> cabling. But now I need a few simple short patch cables. In the shack >>> I have a decent amount 60+ foot or so of RG58/U and then around 120 foot >>> or so of RG58/AU... Pretty much seems about to be the same stuff with >>> one stranded center and the other solid center conductor. I feel for HF >>> use this coax should be ample for a few 18" patches... Anyone disagree? >>> I may end up using these for VHF as well but doubtful I'd do much of >>> anything over 150Mhz. I'm not married to using the cordage that I have >>> on hand but it would be nice to be able to use that stuff.... If there >>> is something that would fit better feel free to advise. (I've always >>> been a fan of RG-8x for HAM use and I use RG-217 or better at work >>> always but like I said I'm not terminating those myself...) >>> >>> I've attempted to do this with PL-259 connectors before and was >>> unsuccessful (but I tried to use a less than optimal soldering iron and >>> it took too long to get things hot and I ended up with a short in the >>> end). I've now bought an adequate dual temp weller gun and should have >>> better success. >>> >>> So I guess for the next real question where would one recommend to get >>> PL-259 and BNC connectors for this job. Should I go for solder on or >>> crimp on? I'm more than willing to spend the money for a good crimp >>> tool if need be and its a better option. >>> >>> Anyway I'm open to recommendations as to where one should procure the >>> connectors as well as any tips, tricks, and opinions on what I should >>> use (so long as the opinions come with explanations). ;) >>> >>> Thanks kindly gentlemen. >>> >>> ~Brett (KC7OTG) >>> >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Elecraft mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:[hidden email] >>> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>> >>> >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Brett Howard
> "(I also have a special tool that strips the jacket, braid and center
> conductor to the correct length, all at one time.)" The coax tooling/prep manufacturers don't do a very good job of matching up their products with coax types. Here's a breakdown of the stripping tools I use for crimp connectors. RG-8/RG-213, etc.: Paladin Tools Model #1256 RG-400, RG-58, RG-59, RG-8X: Paladin Tools # 1255 RG-174, RG-316: Paladin Tools #1258. Each can be configured for 2 or 3 level stripping (default as shipped is 3-level for most crimp connectors). For the actual crimping action, I recently purchased this set with the most used changeable dies for about USD $100: http://tinyurl.com/yf6ozje Paul, W9AC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by alsopb
There's a lot to be said for the convenience of being able to make cables exactly the length you want, when you want them. I like the RG-8 Mini cable which is slightly thicker than RG-58, and I bought a batch of crimp connectors for it. But unlike the RG-58 crimp connectors they didn't come with a sleeve to crimp the braid to the connector. They are all one piece (except for the center pin that you solder on as normal) and from the look of them you are expected to crimp the back of the plug on to the bared cable itself, which I wouldn't have thought would give a reliable connection. Consequently I haven't tried to use them. Has anyone come across connectors like this and knows what you are supposed to do with them?
Julian, G4ILO. K2 #392 K3 #222 KX3 #110
* G4ILO's Shack - http://www.g4ilo.com * KComm - http://www.g4ilo.com/kcomm.html * KTune - http://www.g4ilo.com/ktune.html |
In reply to this post by Brett Howard
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:35:35 -0800, Brett Howard
<[hidden email]> wrote: Using the Times Microwave Attenuation and Power Handling Calculator Downloadable from: http://www.timesmicrowave.com/cable_calculators/, I found that RG58 standard coax has .15dB attenuation at a length of 1.5 feet. If one were using this as a jumper between a Transverter or Rig and an Amplifier the loss would be acceptable, but not as a hook up from the amp to a feedthrough connector in the wall or something like that. The power handling capability of an eighteen inch piece like that is only 130 watts. Tom, N5GE [hidden email] K3 #806 with SUB RX, K3 #1055, PR6, XV144, XV432, KRC2, W1, 2 W2's and other small kits 1 K144XV on order http://www.n5ge.com http://www.swotrc.net >I've done a good portion of building a K2, and completely built a K1... >But amazingly enough I've never solder terminated a coax link... I >guess I've always preferred the look of professionally terminated >cabling. But now I need a few simple short patch cables. In the shack >I have a decent amount 60+ foot or so of RG58/U and then around 120 foot >or so of RG58/AU... Pretty much seems about to be the same stuff with >one stranded center and the other solid center conductor. I feel for HF >use this coax should be ample for a few 18" patches... Anyone disagree? >I may end up using these for VHF as well but doubtful I'd do much of >anything over 150Mhz. I'm not married to using the cordage that I have >on hand but it would be nice to be able to use that stuff.... If there >is something that would fit better feel free to advise. (I've always >been a fan of RG-8x for HAM use and I use RG-217 or better at work >always but like I said I'm not terminating those myself...) > >I've attempted to do this with PL-259 connectors before and was >unsuccessful (but I tried to use a less than optimal soldering iron and >it took too long to get things hot and I ended up with a short in the >end). I've now bought an adequate dual temp weller gun and should have >better success. > >So I guess for the next real question where would one recommend to get >PL-259 and BNC connectors for this job. Should I go for solder on or >crimp on? I'm more than willing to spend the money for a good crimp >tool if need be and its a better option. > >Anyway I'm open to recommendations as to where one should procure the >connectors as well as any tips, tricks, and opinions on what I should >use (so long as the opinions come with explanations). ;) > >Thanks kindly gentlemen. > >~Brett (KC7OTG) ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Amateur Radio Operator N5GE
|
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:40:43 -0600, Radio Amateur N5GE <[hidden email]>
wrote: Oops! The calculation Frequency was 432MHz... Tom, N5GE [hidden email] K3 #806 with SUB RX, K3 #1055, PR6, XV144, XV432, KRC2, W1, 2 W2's and other small kits 1 K144XV on order http://www.n5ge.com http://www.swotrc.net >On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:35:35 -0800, Brett Howard ><[hidden email]> wrote: > >Using the Times Microwave Attenuation and Power Handling Calculator >Downloadable from: http://www.timesmicrowave.com/cable_calculators/, >I found that RG58 standard coax has .15dB attenuation at a length of >1.5 feet. > >If one were using this as a jumper between a Transverter or Rig and an >Amplifier the loss would be acceptable, but not as a hook up from the >amp to a feedthrough connector in the wall or something like that. The >power handling capability of an eighteen inch piece like that is only >130 watts. > >Tom, N5GE ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Amateur Radio Operator N5GE
|
In reply to this post by N5GE
Looks like the RG223 that I selected isn't all that great for high power
either... And I knew that RG-58 was trash and I would never use it at work but as far as home use I always figured meh it works good enough... As far as what I consider acceptable at work it sure is pretty low rent.... ;) Looks like the RG217 that I loved to use so much when I built our EMC compliance lab is still some very top notch stuff... But its spendy! Oh well thankfully I'm still pretty happy with 100 Watts for now... And the three cables that I bought are designated to be coming directly from the K3. Thus with my 6 foot runs for RG-223 will only account for a third of a dB of loss and will get me into my LP-100A just fine (and maybe even get me into an Amp some day) but I find better antennas a LOT more exciting of a prospect than an amp at the moment. ~Brett (KC7OTG) On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 12:40 -0600, Radio Amateur N5GE wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:35:35 -0800, Brett Howard > <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Using the Times Microwave Attenuation and Power Handling Calculator > Downloadable from: http://www.timesmicrowave.com/cable_calculators/, > I found that RG58 standard coax has .15dB attenuation at a length of > 1.5 feet. > > If one were using this as a jumper between a Transverter or Rig and an > Amplifier the loss would be acceptable, but not as a hook up from the > amp to a feedthrough connector in the wall or something like that. The > power handling capability of an eighteen inch piece like that is only > 130 watts. > > Tom, N5GE > > [hidden email] > K3 #806 with SUB RX, K3 #1055, PR6, > XV144, XV432, KRC2, > W1, 2 W2's and other small kits > > 1 K144XV on order > > http://www.n5ge.com > http://www.swotrc.net > > >I've done a good portion of building a K2, and completely built a K1... > >But amazingly enough I've never solder terminated a coax link... I > >guess I've always preferred the look of professionally terminated > >cabling. But now I need a few simple short patch cables. In the shack > >I have a decent amount 60+ foot or so of RG58/U and then around 120 foot > >or so of RG58/AU... Pretty much seems about to be the same stuff with > >one stranded center and the other solid center conductor. I feel for HF > >use this coax should be ample for a few 18" patches... Anyone disagree? > >I may end up using these for VHF as well but doubtful I'd do much of > >anything over 150Mhz. I'm not married to using the cordage that I have > >on hand but it would be nice to be able to use that stuff.... If there > >is something that would fit better feel free to advise. (I've always > >been a fan of RG-8x for HAM use and I use RG-217 or better at work > >always but like I said I'm not terminating those myself...) > > > >I've attempted to do this with PL-259 connectors before and was > >unsuccessful (but I tried to use a less than optimal soldering iron and > >it took too long to get things hot and I ended up with a short in the > >end). I've now bought an adequate dual temp weller gun and should have > >better success. > > > >So I guess for the next real question where would one recommend to get > >PL-259 and BNC connectors for this job. Should I go for solder on or > >crimp on? I'm more than willing to spend the money for a good crimp > >tool if need be and its a better option. > > > >Anyway I'm open to recommendations as to where one should procure the > >connectors as well as any tips, tricks, and opinions on what I should > >use (so long as the opinions come with explanations). ;) > > > >Thanks kindly gentlemen. > > > >~Brett (KC7OTG) > [snip] > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Steven Pituch-3
Ok so if I was looking for a relatively universal crimp tool to meet
most of my needs... (I'm big on if I'm going to buy something I want it to do many things)... ;) I was looking into this crimp tool.. http://www.westmountainradio.com/PWRcrimp.htm For 40 bucks I get the tool and the APP bit then for 14 bucks I could get the #4 die. I have no real need for the RJ one as I've got one of those. Perhaps someday #5 could be useful for helping friends with CATV stuff. But beyond that thats not all THAT expensive and allows for a good bit of stuff... >From looking at other coax crimp tools here: http://www.therfc.com/tooling.htm many of them looked to have very limited cable types... I've got RG8/U, RG58, RG223, and RG8 for ham type stuff around the house... The Connex tool there looks similar to the west mtn one but its a bit pricer... Julian has it right on about being able to make cables the length I want them and with the connectors I want (ie not matching on each end). Right now I've got a 100 foot N terminated spool of TWB 6001 ultra low loss stuff in the garage (that work was going to throw out) and I'd like to use it but honestly I've not ever needed 100' of run to date. Not to mention that that stuff is STIFF!! Now if someone would just make me some coax that is the size of mini RG-8 with the performance of RG-217 but the flexibility and cost of RG-58. Then I would have no qualms about having to select what types of coax I want to buy tools and connectors for! So far I think that RG-8/U and RG223 are a decent balance... ~Brett (KC7OTG) On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 07:47 -0600, Steven Pituch wrote: > Hi all, > > I have made a coax connector tutorial and have it on my server at: > > http://tinyurl.com/ydhoeyr > > I also have an Anderson Powerpole connector tutorial at: > > http://tinyurl.com/y9knmrr > > Both have lots of info and photos. > > 72, > Steve, W2MY > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
"Ok so if I was looking for a relatively universal crimp tool to meet 2most
of my needs... (I'm big on if I'm going to buy something I want it to do many things)... ;) I was looking into this crimp tool.. http://www.westmountainradio.com/PWRcrimp.htm". The only issue I see is that it apparently doesn't crimp the coax center pins. So you'd need to always get the solder-on center pin connector. Phil - AD5X ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |