Balanced solution for KAT500 tuner?

[vk4tux]

Just to elaborate that is at the shack transition end , not at the
feedpoint. At the feedpoint there is nothing un that needs to be bal, so no
need for a balun.

 

 

1:1 current balun has proven more efficient in conjunction with the

appropriate balanced (matchbox style)tuner.

 

-----Original Message-----

From:  <http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft> elecraft-bounces
at mailman.qth.net

[mailto: <http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft> elecraft-bounces
at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Robert G. Strickland

Sent: Sunday, 30 September 2012 4:26 AM

To:  <http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft> elecraft at
mailman.qth.net

Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Balanced solution for KAT500 tuner?

 

Jim...

 

Is there anything to be gained in putting a 1:1 "balanced isolator" at the

feed point of an antenna that is fed by a "parallel wire" feed line? Does

such an arrangement achieve feed line isolation while preserving the ability

of such an antenna to be driven on various bands other than its resonant

frequency? Thanks for your input.

 

...robert

 

 

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html