For multiple reasons we dumped satellite TV. Cable service was gone 10
years ago. While the DSS receiver and its associated power supply didn't give me any issues, I found the plastic box in which the receiver was contained offered little to no shielding from my HF transmitters. Specifically the remote control receiver, being an RF remote, must have a front end as broad as a barn door. Even when the remote control method was switched to IR, the remote receiver was still active in the box. My solution was to wrap the entire receiver, except a small front corner where the IR receiver was located, in aluminum foil. No amount of ferrites on the input, power and output would resolve the issue. It looked a bit crude but it worked. My wife would certainly let me know when the thing changed channels or turned on and off by itself during her Pay Per View movies. The straw which made the final decision to dump satellite TV was weather related signal loss, along with their customer service. Either thunder storms in the summer or snow and ice in the winter where I've had to sweep snow and break ice off of the dish to restore the signal. Fortunately we are in an area, although basically rural, where our phone company provides not only phone, but internet, and HD TV, by underground fiber to the house. They run dedicated CAT 5E cable to each of the TV's {3} and another to my wireless router from the fiber termination on the side of the house. They also provide battery back-up for the fiber termination. The bottom line, their system is totally immune to RF on any HF band and any power level, and we no longer have to worry about WX related outages. And with the expanded package it is costing less than the Direct TV service. I think it is a win win situation. I wish everyone had a system such as this. 73 Bob, K4TAX ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
You are, of course, absolutely correct Jim. Know that one model of the sat
receiver uses an RF remote of some sort that many think is the culprit. Sadly the response from the, understandably RF clueless, sat help lines is kind of like going to a doctor with the plea "it hurts to do this" and response of "well don't do that." I suspect nothing will change much until a 40m signal affects the sat systems of the ham's neighbors resulting in a Part 15/97 brawl. On Wed, March 14, 2018 22:47, Jim Brown wrote: > Problems like this are the result of design defects in the cable modem. > It should be possible to solve problems of this sort by winding multiple > turns of both the coax and the power cable #31 or #43 Fair-Rite toroids. > See > > http://k9yc.com/KillingReceiveNoise.pdf > > for part numbers and guidelines for winding. While the app note discusses > RX noise radiated from gear like this, the cures are the same > for both. > > AND -- because it's the result of a defective modem (i.e. a bad design), > ALWAYS call the vendor and tell them to fix it. > > 73, Jim K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
I’m wondering how much worse the problem will be as DirecTV goes to this new technology that’s being advertised on TV-something about a wireless receiver. I’ll have to pay more attention. It sounds like something that the girlfriend may want to wait for. Right now her equipment is first-generation, and she would like to have a DVR with larger capacity and a 4K-capable receiver for whenever that becomes available.
72/73 de Jim-AD6CW > On Mar 15, 2018, at 8:24 AM, John Huggins, kx4o <[hidden email]> wrote: > > You are, of course, absolutely correct Jim. Know that one model of the sat > receiver uses an RF remote of some sort that many think is the culprit. > > Sadly the response from the, understandably RF clueless, sat help lines is > kind of like going to a doctor with the plea "it hurts to do this" and > response of "well don't do that." > > I suspect nothing will change much until a 40m signal affects the sat > systems of the ham's neighbors resulting in a Part 15/97 brawl. > >> On Wed, March 14, 2018 22:47, Jim Brown wrote: >> Problems like this are the result of design defects in the cable modem. >> It should be possible to solve problems of this sort by winding multiple >> turns of both the coax and the power cable #31 or #43 Fair-Rite toroids. >> See >> >> http://k9yc.com/KillingReceiveNoise.pdf >> >> for part numbers and guidelines for winding. While the app note discusses >> RX noise radiated from gear like this, the cures are the same >> for both. >> >> AND -- because it's the result of a defective modem (i.e. a bad design), >> ALWAYS call the vendor and tell them to fix it. >> >> 73, Jim K9YC > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
This is getting a bit off-topic, but Directv has larger hard drives and
even add-on extenders up to 4 TB, as well as a dedicated 4K channel plus on-demand 4K. need a DVR server plus a 4K client box. Bob. N7XY On 3/15/18 9:26 AM, Jim Low man wrote: > I’m wondering how much worse the problem will be as DirecTV goes to this new technology that’s being advertised on TV-something about a wireless receiver. I’ll have to pay more attention. It sounds like something that the girlfriend may want to wait for. Right now her equipment is first-generation, and she would like to have a DVR with larger capacity and a 4K-capable receiver for whenever that becomes available. > > 72/73 de Jim-AD6CW > >> On Mar 15, 2018, at 8:24 AM, John Huggins, kx4o <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> You are, of course, absolutely correct Jim. Know that one model of the sat >> receiver uses an RF remote of some sort that many think is the culprit. >> >> Sadly the response from the, understandably RF clueless, sat help lines is >> kind of like going to a doctor with the plea "it hurts to do this" and >> response of "well don't do that." >> >> I suspect nothing will change much until a 40m signal affects the sat >> systems of the ham's neighbors resulting in a Part 15/97 brawl. >> >>> On Wed, March 14, 2018 22:47, Jim Brown wrote: >>> Problems like this are the result of design defects in the cable modem. >>> It should be possible to solve problems of this sort by winding multiple >>> turns of both the coax and the power cable #31 or #43 Fair-Rite toroids. >>> See >>> >>> http://k9yc.com/KillingReceiveNoise.pdf >>> >>> for part numbers and guidelines for winding. While the app note discusses >>> RX noise radiated from gear like this, the cures are the same >>> for both. >>> >>> AND -- because it's the result of a defective modem (i.e. a bad design), >>> ALWAYS call the vendor and tell them to fix it. >>> >>> 73, Jim K9YC >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[hidden email] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> Message delivered to [hidden email] > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |