Elecraft

Diversity and Link

Classic

List

Threaded

2 messages Options

Edward A. Dauer

Diversity and Link

Good to hear. But at the same time I am one of those - maybe a minority -
who uses and values the link function. It¹s a matter of operating style,
I suppose. Any chance of preserving that in a configuration choice?

Ted, KN1CBR

>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 13
>Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 15:34:20 -0800
>From: Wayne Burdick <[hidden email]>
>To: Elecraft Reflector <[hidden email]>
>Cc: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]>
>Subject: [Elecraft] Who said anything about removing diversity? That
> would *never* happen...
>Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>I don't know who started this thread, but let me say definitively that we
>would never remove Diversity mode. The K3 has one of the best diversity
>implementations in any transceiver, and many operators use it all the
>time. That is why we wanted to make it easier to use by assigning it as
>the regular-hold function of the SUB switch.
>
>Wayne
>N6KR

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]

Guy Olinger K2AV

Re: Diversity and Link

Do you think the link function is being removed altogether (it is
not), or is the issue losing the use of HOLD on the SUB button for
LINK?

My interesting string of off-reflector emails about this mostly
involves people using LINK in very complex ways, combined with other
things.

Oddly enough, if I understand them correctly, their use of LINK does
not involve the use of the SUB button at all. I don't think any of
them are hurt at all by the button change, apparently mostly annoyed
that their usage of LINK is not recognized, that others seem to think
that LINK has no use. I'm sure Wayne has figured that out. Given what
I've gotten in email as a totally perimeter player on all this, Wayne
must have been buried in email about it.

I have learned a new term, "button board", a device to go next to the
keyboard somewhere, where the stuff done by the buttons is
complicated, and, it seems, quite specific to the individual ham.

It's not that the cat does not get skinned, but that there are many
ways to skin that cat, apparently ALL of them in use somewhere.

73, Guy K2AV

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Dauer, Edward <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Good to hear. But at the same time I am one of those - maybe a minority -
> who uses and values the link function. It¹s a matter of operating style,
> I suppose. Any chance of preserving that in a configuration choice?
>
> Ted, KN1CBR
>
>
>>
>>
>>------------------------------
>>
>>Message: 13
>>Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 15:34:20 -0800
>>From: Wayne Burdick <[hidden email]>
>>To: Elecraft Reflector <[hidden email]>
>>Cc: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]>
>>Subject: [Elecraft] Who said anything about removing diversity? That
>> would *never* happen...
>>Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>
>>I don't know who started this thread, but let me say definitively that we
>>would never remove Diversity mode. The K3 has one of the best diversity
>>implementations in any transceiver, and many operators use it all the
>>time. That is why we wanted to make it easier to use by assigning it as
>>the regular-hold function of the SUB switch.
>>
>>Wayne
>>N6KR
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to [hidden email]