Elecraft] K3 LONG delay in TX after TXINH removed (solved)

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Elecraft] K3 LONG delay in TX after TXINH removed (solved)

Edward R Cole
Although Mark has solved his INH problem, I thought I would share my
ckt for using the inhibit function with the K3 (in fact it also has
ckts for inhibiting a FT-847 which I no longer have):
http://www.kl7uw.com/TX-INHIBIT.htm

I use the Band-0 and Band-1 select functions to control VHF
inhibiting, only.  One can omit them for using inhibit for all
frequencies.  DIGOUT-1 is used for 6m inhibit in my station.

What is not shown in my current configuration is that the inhibit
line is run thru TR relay sense contacts to ensure TR relays are in
Tx position before enabling xmit on the K3 (useful if running QRO).

Hope this is helpful for anyone planning use of the K3 INH function.

73, Ed - KL7UW

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K3 LONG delay in TX after TXINH removed (solved)

Mark n2qt
Be aware that Ed's circuit is much like mine in that it does not have a pull down on the
TxInh line.  Therefore it could act like mine did and extend the time till transmit is
enabled.  A resistor to ground might be a good addition if this is important.

Also as a side note, the kx3 is different from the k3 in that it has a pull up on its txinh pin
(actually on ACC2) so if you select txinh=hi, the radio will not transmit without something
to pull the line down.  

Mark. N2QT

On Jan 27, 2013, at 11:51 AM, Edward R Cole <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Although Mark has solved his INH problem, I thought I would share my ckt for using the inhibit function with the K3 (in fact it also has ckts for inhibiting a FT-847 which I no longer have):
> http://www.kl7uw.com/TX-INHIBIT.htm
>
> I use the Band-0 and Band-1 select functions to control VHF inhibiting, only.  One can omit them for using inhibit for all frequencies.  DIGOUT-1 is used for 6m inhibit in my station.
>
> What is not shown in my current configuration is that the inhibit line is run thru TR relay sense contacts to ensure TR relays are in Tx position before enabling xmit on the K3 (useful if running QRO).
>
> Hope this is helpful for anyone planning use of the K3 INH function.
>
> 73, Ed - KL7UW
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K3 LONG delay in TX after TXINH removed (solved)

Mark n2qt
Oops,  the txinh in Ed's circuit is done with relay k4 which pulls the line to ground, eliminating
Any ambiguity.   My mistake was assuming k1 was doing this function, instead of its clearly indicated action of switching control between the k3 and ft 847.  

Mea culpa

Mark. N2QT

On Jan 27, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Mark <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Be aware that Ed's circuit is much like mine in that it does not have a pull down on the
> TxInh line.  Therefore it could act like mine did and extend the time till transmit is
> enabled.  A resistor to ground might be a good addition if this is important.
>
> Also as a side note, the kx3 is different from the k3 in that it has a pull up on its txinh pin
> (actually on ACC2) so if you select txinh=hi, the radio will not transmit without something
> to pull the line down.  
>
> Mark. N2QT
>
> On Jan 27, 2013, at 11:51 AM, Edward R Cole <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Although Mark has solved his INH problem, I thought I would share my ckt for using the inhibit function with the K3 (in fact it also has ckts for inhibiting a FT-847 which I no longer have):
>> http://www.kl7uw.com/TX-INHIBIT.htm
>>
>> I use the Band-0 and Band-1 select functions to control VHF inhibiting, only.  One can omit them for using inhibit for all frequencies.  DIGOUT-1 is used for 6m inhibit in my station.
>>
>> What is not shown in my current configuration is that the inhibit line is run thru TR relay sense contacts to ensure TR relays are in Tx position before enabling xmit on the K3 (useful if running QRO).
>>
>> Hope this is helpful for anyone planning use of the K3 INH function.
>>
>> 73, Ed - KL7UW
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html