The problems continue with K3 #2803
The problem is still unable to load FPF or DSP firmware. MCU loads fine. I have used two different computers in an attempt to load the firmware. On each computer I have used the KUSB and a 9 pin straight thru serial cable. That doesn't work. I have reloaded the K3 utility to make sure it is the latest version and still no luck. In numerous e mails with Gary we thought trying a new front panel board might work. Wrong , After installing a new front panel board same problem. On page 63 of the owners manual if I hold in the shift / Lo knob while turning on the power I am suppose to see EE INT. All I see is ERR EE2. The K3 is a nice looking radio and maybe one day it will work but , Right now , Very frustrated to say the least. Glenn K5ZE ----- Original Message ----- From: "Glenn Haffly" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 9:48 AM Subject: K3 2803 Firmware Problem > Good morning all , I have a problem with firmware upload to my K3. All I > can load is MCU. The FBF fails at load address x0040. > I have used two different computers using both a 9 pin straight through > and the KUSB. I have the latest K3 utility. > When loading from a past configuration I receive an error message Verify > Failed at EEPROM address 131.224 > I have corresponded with Gary at Elecraft several times and did check > those items he suggested. As of yet , Gary's suggestion have not worked. > I have yet to get a full firmware download. Does anyone have suggestions > for me to check or does the radio have a problem and need to go > back for repair at Elecraft? > > Thank you > Glenn > K5ZE ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
You can ship the radio back and have Elecraft check it out. If it is a
board problem I believe they will take care of it for you. CC Packet Cluster W0MU-1 W0MU.NET or 67.40.148.194 "A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over." Ben Franklin -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Glenn Haffly Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 10:51 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: [Elecraft] Fw: K3 2803 Firmware Problem The problems continue with K3 #2803 The problem is still unable to load FPF or DSP firmware. MCU loads fine. I have used two different computers in an attempt to load the firmware. On each computer I have used the KUSB and a 9 pin straight thru serial cable. That doesn't work. I have reloaded the K3 utility to make sure it is the latest version and still no luck. In numerous e mails with Gary we thought trying a new front panel board might work. Wrong , After installing a new front panel board same problem. On page 63 of the owners manual if I hold in the shift / Lo knob while turning on the power I am suppose to see EE INT. All I see is ERR EE2. The K3 is a nice looking radio and maybe one day it will work but , Right now , Very frustrated to say the least. Glenn K5ZE ----- Original Message ----- From: "Glenn Haffly" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 9:48 AM Subject: K3 2803 Firmware Problem > Good morning all , I have a problem with firmware upload to my K3. All I > can load is MCU. The FBF fails at load address x0040. > I have used two different computers using both a 9 pin straight through > and the KUSB. I have the latest K3 utility. > When loading from a past configuration I receive an error message Verify > Failed at EEPROM address 131.224 > I have corresponded with Gary at Elecraft several times and did check > those items he suggested. As of yet , Gary's suggestion have not worked. > I have yet to get a full firmware download. Does anyone have suggestions > for me to check or does the radio have a problem and need to go > back for repair at Elecraft? > > Thank you > Glenn > K5ZE ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
I spent the morning installing a sub rx in my K3 #1516. All is working
well. I set it up using the KAT3 ant2 as input the the sub rx. Now I'm thinking that there is no advantage to doing it this way(other then me being too lazy to install the aux bnc connector). Does it really matter, is there any advantage to using the bnc as an rx only input? I have a four way antenna switch downstream from the K3 so there is no advantage to the ant2 not being used by the main receiver as all antennas come in through ant1. The ant2 input would go unused otherwise. Is the bnc rx input better, is it worth taking my K3 apart to install the BNC rx connector ? All 150 to 400 answers welcome... 73 Jeff kb2m ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
The setup I use with an array solutions six pack remote switch is to
have ANT1 and ANT2 both going to the six pack. This way I can mix and match any of my available antennas to optimize diversity receive. 73 Greg AB7R On Apr 7, 2009, at 3:44 PM, jeff kb2m wrote: > I spent the morning installing a sub rx in my K3 #1516. All is working > well. I set it up using the KAT3 ant2 as input the the sub rx. Now > I'm > thinking that there is no advantage to doing it this way(other then > me being > too lazy to install the aux bnc connector). Does it really matter, > is there > any advantage to using the bnc as an rx only input? I have a four way > antenna switch downstream from the K3 so there is no advantage to > the ant2 > not being used by the main receiver as all antennas come in through > ant1. > The ant2 input would go unused otherwise. Is the bnc rx input > better, is it > worth taking my K3 apart to install the BNC rx connector ? All 150 > to 400 > answers welcome... > > 73 Jeff kb2m > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Jeff kb2m
Hi Jeff:
One possible problem is that if you were to accidentally press the ANT button you would transmit into your receive antenna. 73, Mike K2MK jeff kb2m Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:44:36 -0700 I spent the morning installing a sub rx in my K3 #1516. All is working well. I set it up using the KAT3 ant2 as input the the sub rx. Now I'm thinking that there is no advantage to doing it this way(other then me being too lazy to install the aux bnc connector). Does it really matter, is there any advantage to using the bnc as an rx only input? I have a four way antenna switch downstream from the K3 so there is no advantage to the ant2 not being used by the main receiver as all antennas come in through ant1. The ant2 input would go unused otherwise. Is the bnc rx input better, is it worth taking my K3 apart to install the BNC rx connector ? All 150 to 400 answers welcome... 73 Jeff kb2m ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Jeff kb2m
There's one ... at least ... condition where the BNC input jack
and cable is useful. I bought the 2nd RX -only- to monitor 6M for band activity while I'm using the radio on other bands. The BNC allows me to connect a 6M GP to the 2nd RX. My ANT 2 connector is connected to the 6M beam. A tip: The cable from the BNC is -much- easier to plug into the 2nd RX by removing the KIO3 panel and the boards behind it than removing or even partially lifting the 2nd RX to connect the cable to the input. 73! Ken Kopp - K0PP [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Jeff kb2m
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
|
Thanks for bringing up the attenuation issue with using ant1/ant2. Has
anyone tried it both ways and have any comments? 73 Jeff kb2m ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ron D'Eau Claire" <[hidden email]> To: "'jeff kb2m'" <[hidden email]>; <[hidden email]> Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 7:41 PM Subject: RE: [Elecraft] KRX3 antenna input > There are couple of points to keep in mind if you don't use the AUX input > and use ANT1/ANT2 for both sub receiver and main tx/rx. They're covered in > the KRX3 manual, but in case you missed them: > > 1) You'll need well-isolated antennas to avoid RF tripping the COR in the > antenna input used by the sub receiver. > > 2) If you try to listen on a higher-frequency band on the subreceiver than > you're using for the main, you may notice significant signal attenuation > in > the sub receiver. That's because when using ANT1/ANT2 you're sharing the > main band pass filters and they have significant attenuation on the bands > above the one selected. > > Both issues are avoided by using the AUX input instead. > > Ron AC7AC > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] > [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of jeff kb2m > Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 3:44 PM > To: [hidden email] > Subject: [Elecraft] KRX3 antenna input > > I spent the morning installing a sub rx in my K3 #1516. All is working > well. I set it up using the KAT3 ant2 as input the the sub rx. Now I'm > thinking that there is no advantage to doing it this way(other then me > being > > too lazy to install the aux bnc connector). Does it really matter, is > there > any advantage to using the bnc as an rx only input? I have a four way > antenna switch downstream from the K3 so there is no advantage to the ant2 > not being used by the main receiver as all antennas come in through ant1. > The ant2 input would go unused otherwise. Is the bnc rx input better, is > it > worth taking my K3 apart to install the BNC rx connector ? All 150 to 400 > answers welcome... > > 73 Jeff kb2m ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
I have reported to Wayne that the Pre and Att memory goes across both the
receivers. I thought they were independent. He has responded that it is under investigation. Perhaps this is the issue Jeff is bringing up. 73, Bill K9YEQ -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of jeff kb2m Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 7:22 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KRX3 antenna input Thanks for bringing up the attenuation issue with using ant1/ant2. Has anyone tried it both ways and have any comments? 73 Jeff kb2m ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ron D'Eau Claire" <[hidden email]> To: "'jeff kb2m'" <[hidden email]>; <[hidden email]> Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 7:41 PM Subject: RE: [Elecraft] KRX3 antenna input > There are couple of points to keep in mind if you don't use the AUX input > and use ANT1/ANT2 for both sub receiver and main tx/rx. They're covered in > the KRX3 manual, but in case you missed them: > > 1) You'll need well-isolated antennas to avoid RF tripping the COR in the > antenna input used by the sub receiver. > > 2) If you try to listen on a higher-frequency band on the subreceiver than > you're using for the main, you may notice significant signal attenuation > in > the sub receiver. That's because when using ANT1/ANT2 you're sharing the > main band pass filters and they have significant attenuation on the bands > above the one selected. > > Both issues are avoided by using the AUX input instead. > > Ron AC7AC > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] > [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of jeff kb2m > Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 3:44 PM > To: [hidden email] > Subject: [Elecraft] KRX3 antenna input > > I spent the morning installing a sub rx in my K3 #1516. All is working > well. I set it up using the KAT3 ant2 as input the the sub rx. Now I'm > thinking that there is no advantage to doing it this way(other then me > being > > too lazy to install the aux bnc connector). Does it really matter, is > there > any advantage to using the bnc as an rx only input? I have a four way > antenna switch downstream from the K3 so there is no advantage to the ant2 > not being used by the main receiver as all antennas come in through ant1. > The ant2 input would go unused otherwise. Is the bnc rx input better, is > it > worth taking my K3 apart to install the BNC rx connector ? All 150 to 400 > answers welcome... > > 73 Jeff kb2m ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |