Fw: K3 2803 Firmware Problem

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
9 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Fw: K3 2803 Firmware Problem

ghaffly
The problems continue with K3 #2803
The problem is still unable to load FPF or DSP firmware. MCU loads fine.
I have used two different computers in an attempt to load the firmware. On
each computer I have used the KUSB and a 9 pin straight thru serial cable.
That doesn't work.
I have reloaded the K3 utility to make sure it is the latest version and
still no luck.
In numerous e mails with Gary we thought trying a new front panel board
might work. Wrong , After installing a new front panel board same problem.
On page 63 of the owners manual if I hold in the shift / Lo knob while
turning on the power I am suppose to see EE INT. All I see is ERR EE2.

The K3 is a nice looking radio and maybe one day it will work but , Right
now , Very frustrated to say the least.

Glenn
K5ZE
----- Original Message -----
From: "Glenn Haffly" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 9:48 AM
Subject: K3 2803 Firmware Problem


> Good morning all , I have a problem with firmware upload to my K3. All I
> can load is MCU. The FBF fails at load address x0040.
> I have used two different computers using both a 9 pin straight through
> and the KUSB. I have the latest K3 utility.
> When loading from a past configuration I receive an error message Verify
> Failed at EEPROM address 131.224
> I have corresponded with Gary at Elecraft several times and did check
> those items he suggested. As of yet , Gary's suggestion have not worked.
> I have yet to get a full firmware download. Does anyone have suggestions
> for me to check or does the radio have a problem and need to go
> back for repair at Elecraft?
>
> Thank you
> Glenn
> K5ZE

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Fw: K3 2803 Firmware Problem

w0mu
You can ship the radio back and have Elecraft check it out.  If it is a
board problem I believe they will take care of it for you.


CC Packet Cluster W0MU-1
W0MU.NET or  67.40.148.194

"A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may
never get over." Ben Franklin



-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email]
[mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Glenn Haffly
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 10:51 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: [Elecraft] Fw: K3 2803 Firmware Problem

The problems continue with K3 #2803
The problem is still unable to load FPF or DSP firmware. MCU loads fine.
I have used two different computers in an attempt to load the firmware. On
each computer I have used the KUSB and a 9 pin straight thru serial cable.
That doesn't work.
I have reloaded the K3 utility to make sure it is the latest version and
still no luck.
In numerous e mails with Gary we thought trying a new front panel board
might work. Wrong , After installing a new front panel board same problem.
On page 63 of the owners manual if I hold in the shift / Lo knob while
turning on the power I am suppose to see EE INT. All I see is ERR EE2.

The K3 is a nice looking radio and maybe one day it will work but , Right
now , Very frustrated to say the least.

Glenn
K5ZE
----- Original Message -----
From: "Glenn Haffly" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 9:48 AM
Subject: K3 2803 Firmware Problem


> Good morning all , I have a problem with firmware upload to my K3. All I
> can load is MCU. The FBF fails at load address x0040.
> I have used two different computers using both a 9 pin straight through
> and the KUSB. I have the latest K3 utility.
> When loading from a past configuration I receive an error message Verify
> Failed at EEPROM address 131.224
> I have corresponded with Gary at Elecraft several times and did check
> those items he suggested. As of yet , Gary's suggestion have not worked.
> I have yet to get a full firmware download. Does anyone have suggestions
> for me to check or does the radio have a problem and need to go
> back for repair at Elecraft?
>
> Thank you
> Glenn
> K5ZE

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

KRX3 antenna input

Jeff kb2m
 I spent the morning installing a sub rx in my K3 #1516. All is working
well. I set it up using the KAT3 ant2  as input the the sub rx. Now I'm
thinking that there is no advantage to doing it this way(other then me being
too lazy to install the aux bnc connector). Does it really matter, is there
any advantage to using the bnc as an rx only input?  I have a four way
antenna switch downstream from the K3 so there is no advantage to the ant2
not being used by the main receiver as all antennas come in through ant1.
The ant2 input would go unused otherwise. Is the bnc rx input better, is it
worth taking my K3 apart to install the BNC rx connector ? All 150 to 400
answers  welcome...

73 Jeff kb2m
 

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: KRX3 antenna input

Greg - AB7R
The setup I use with an array solutions six pack remote switch is to  
have ANT1 and ANT2 both going to the six pack.  This way I can mix and  
match any of my available antennas to optimize diversity receive.

73
Greg
AB7R

On Apr 7, 2009, at 3:44 PM, jeff kb2m wrote:

> I spent the morning installing a sub rx in my K3 #1516. All is working
> well. I set it up using the KAT3 ant2  as input the the sub rx. Now  
> I'm
> thinking that there is no advantage to doing it this way(other then  
> me being
> too lazy to install the aux bnc connector). Does it really matter,  
> is there
> any advantage to using the bnc as an rx only input?  I have a four way
> antenna switch downstream from the K3 so there is no advantage to  
> the ant2
> not being used by the main receiver as all antennas come in through  
> ant1.
> The ant2 input would go unused otherwise. Is the bnc rx input  
> better, is it
> worth taking my K3 apart to install the BNC rx connector ? All 150  
> to 400
> answers  welcome...
>
> 73 Jeff kb2m
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: KRX3 antenna input

Mike K2MK
In reply to this post by Jeff kb2m
Hi Jeff:

One possible problem is that if you were to accidentally press the ANT
button you would transmit into your receive antenna.

73,
Mike K2MK

jeff kb2m
Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:44:36 -0700

 I spent the morning installing a sub rx in my K3 #1516. All is working
well. I set it up using the KAT3 ant2  as input the the sub rx. Now I'm
thinking that there is no advantage to doing it this way(other then me being
too lazy to install the aux bnc connector). Does it really matter, is there
any advantage to using the bnc as an rx only input?  I have a four way
antenna switch downstream from the K3 so there is no advantage to the ant2
not being used by the main receiver as all antennas come in through ant1.
The ant2 input would go unused otherwise. Is the bnc rx input better, is it
worth taking my K3 apart to install the BNC rx connector ? All 150 to 400
answers  welcome...

73 Jeff kb2m
 

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

KRX3 antenna input

Ken Kopp-3
In reply to this post by Jeff kb2m
There's one ... at least ... condition where the BNC input jack
and cable is useful.  I bought the 2nd RX -only- to monitor 6M
for band activity while I'm using the radio on other bands.  The
BNC allows me to connect a 6M GP to the 2nd RX.  My ANT 2
connector is connected to the 6M beam.

A tip:  The cable from the BNC is -much- easier to plug into the
2nd RX by removing the KIO3 panel and the boards behind it
than removing or even partially lifting the 2nd RX to connect the
cable to the input.

73! Ken Kopp - K0PP
      [hidden email]
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: KRX3 antenna input

AC7AC
In reply to this post by Jeff kb2m
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: KRX3 antenna input

Jeff kb2m
Thanks for bringing up the attenuation issue with using ant1/ant2. Has
anyone tried it both ways and have any comments?

73 Jeff kb2m

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron D'Eau Claire" <[hidden email]>
To: "'jeff kb2m'" <[hidden email]>; <[hidden email]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 7:41 PM
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] KRX3 antenna input


> There are couple of points to keep in mind if you don't use the AUX input
> and use ANT1/ANT2 for both sub receiver and main tx/rx. They're covered in
> the KRX3 manual, but in case you missed them:
>
> 1) You'll need well-isolated antennas to avoid RF tripping the COR in the
> antenna input used by the sub receiver.
>
> 2) If you try to listen on a higher-frequency band on the subreceiver than
> you're using for the main, you may notice significant signal attenuation
> in
> the sub receiver. That's because when using ANT1/ANT2 you're sharing the
> main band pass filters and they have significant attenuation on the bands
> above the one selected.
>
> Both issues are avoided by using the AUX input instead.
>
> Ron AC7AC
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email]
> [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of jeff kb2m
> Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 3:44 PM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: [Elecraft] KRX3 antenna input
>
> I spent the morning installing a sub rx in my K3 #1516. All is working
> well. I set it up using the KAT3 ant2  as input the the sub rx. Now I'm
> thinking that there is no advantage to doing it this way(other then me
> being
>
> too lazy to install the aux bnc connector). Does it really matter, is
> there
> any advantage to using the bnc as an rx only input?  I have a four way
> antenna switch downstream from the K3 so there is no advantage to the ant2
> not being used by the main receiver as all antennas come in through ant1.
> The ant2 input would go unused otherwise. Is the bnc rx input better, is
> it
> worth taking my K3 apart to install the BNC rx connector ? All 150 to 400
> answers  welcome...
>
> 73 Jeff kb2m

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: KRX3 antenna input

Bill Johnson-9
I have reported to Wayne that the Pre and Att memory goes across both the
receivers.  I thought they were independent. He has responded that it is
under investigation. Perhaps this is the issue Jeff is bringing up.


73,

Bill
K9YEQ

-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email]
[mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of jeff kb2m
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 7:22 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KRX3 antenna input

Thanks for bringing up the attenuation issue with using ant1/ant2. Has
anyone tried it both ways and have any comments?

73 Jeff kb2m

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron D'Eau Claire" <[hidden email]>
To: "'jeff kb2m'" <[hidden email]>; <[hidden email]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 7:41 PM
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] KRX3 antenna input


> There are couple of points to keep in mind if you don't use the AUX input
> and use ANT1/ANT2 for both sub receiver and main tx/rx. They're covered in
> the KRX3 manual, but in case you missed them:
>
> 1) You'll need well-isolated antennas to avoid RF tripping the COR in the
> antenna input used by the sub receiver.
>
> 2) If you try to listen on a higher-frequency band on the subreceiver than
> you're using for the main, you may notice significant signal attenuation
> in
> the sub receiver. That's because when using ANT1/ANT2 you're sharing the
> main band pass filters and they have significant attenuation on the bands
> above the one selected.
>
> Both issues are avoided by using the AUX input instead.
>
> Ron AC7AC
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email]
> [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of jeff kb2m
> Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 3:44 PM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: [Elecraft] KRX3 antenna input
>
> I spent the morning installing a sub rx in my K3 #1516. All is working
> well. I set it up using the KAT3 ant2  as input the the sub rx. Now I'm
> thinking that there is no advantage to doing it this way(other then me
> being
>
> too lazy to install the aux bnc connector). Does it really matter, is
> there
> any advantage to using the bnc as an rx only input?  I have a four way
> antenna switch downstream from the K3 so there is no advantage to the ant2
> not being used by the main receiver as all antennas come in through ant1.
> The ant2 input would go unused otherwise. Is the bnc rx input better, is
> it
> worth taking my K3 apart to install the BNC rx connector ? All 150 to 400
> answers  welcome...
>
> 73 Jeff kb2m

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html