Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
48 posts
|
Gang It's been a great discussion and a real eye-opener for this naive academic, who assumed that USB is properly regulated by an IEEE Standard [it is not] and that a well-engineered, standard-observant and portable USB driver exists. [It doesn't.] Thank you all for helping to set me straight! The takeaways for me: *There is presently no feasible alternative to RS 232 as an Interface. Wayne & Eric made the right choice. USB is a non-starter, being FUBARd due to the lack of an enforced standard. What's more, * RS 232 is plenty good enough for the undemanding radio control or "knob-substitution" task. [Audio & video transmission may be another matter, but that's for another time.] * There's no call to sniff at RS -232 just because it's almost a half-century old. Unix [tm] is about forty years old, and still the reliability and efficiency champ. [No, I don't want to start a controversy on that!] * Desktop PCs are better than laptops for radio control, because you can fit RS232 cards to them. And laptops may have noise problems due to sloppy construction. * There are many - way too many - radio communication protocol "standards" - Kenwood, K3, etc etc. We must just Get Used To It [until YaeWoodCom sees the light and imitates the K3]. eric VA7DZ K3 3620 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
516 posts
|
Before slapping around the other manufacturers, I think you'll find that the K3 follows the Kenwood protocols, not the other way around.
--- On Wed, 3/17/10, eric manning <[hidden email]> wrote: [snip] > > * Desktop PCs are better than laptops for radio control, > because you can > fit RS232 cards to them. And laptops may have noise > problems due to > sloppy construction. > > * There are many - way too many - radio communication > protocol > "standards" - Kenwood, K3, etc etc. We must just Get Used > To It > [until YaeWoodCom sees the light and imitates the K3]. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |