G3SJX review in Radcom (RSGB)

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

G3SJX review in Radcom (RSGB)

Bill W4ZV


GM3SEK wrote:
 >Those statements are incorrect in almost every detail.

         Just to clarify, you are referring to G4ILO and not
me.  I asked a question which G4ILO responded to.  In case
any misunderstood the message header, it was G4ILO's comments
which followed mine.  Sorry for being picky but I do not like
comments I didn't make attributed to me (even accidentally).

"G4ILO wrote:  <---Which means his comments followed my question
 >Bill W4ZV wrote:"

 >I don't know if Peter Hart has plans to review the K3 or not. But I do
know Peter, and I do know that his reviews have NEVER been influenced by
advertising considerations.

         I agree.  Peter has demonstrated the utmost integrity
in my readings of his many reviews, presentations, etc.

 >The RSGB advertising department may try to sell space opposite a review
that is about to be published, but that in no way affects the integrity
of what Peter has already written.

         Most publications worth reading (RadCom is one
of the very best) make a clear distinction between the
editorial department and advertising department.  Would
you even bother reading something that you felt was not
objective and had been "bought" with advertising?  I doubt
it.  Such publications would not be in business very long.

                                 73,  Bill  W4ZV



_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: G3SJX review in Radcom (RSGB)

gm3sek
Bill Tippett wrote:

>
>
>GM3SEK wrote:
>>Those statements are incorrect in almost every detail.
>
>        Just to clarify, you are referring to G4ILO and not
>me.  I asked a question which G4ILO responded to.  In case
>any misunderstood the message header, it was G4ILO's comments
>which followed mine.  Sorry for being picky but I do not like
>comments I didn't make attributed to me (even accidentally).
>

I hope it was clear to everyone that I had no disagreement with what
Bill had said.

We both agree that (in Bill's words):
>Peter has demonstrated the utmost integrity
>in my readings of his many reviews, presentations, etc.
>


--

73 from Ian GM3SEK         'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB)
http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

SignaLink USB and K2

Matt Patterson-9
In reply to this post by Bill W4ZV
Hi,

I have a Signalink USB and would like to use it with my K2 which has a
8pin mic connector and is wired up for a Kenwood mic.  My question is,
do I just use the kenwood pinout for the SLUSB?  Is anyone else using a
SLUSB with their K2?  If so, how do you have your it jumpered?

Thanks,
Matt
W5LL
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com