|
Just wondering how important it is to have connect the GND terminals between the KX3 and the KXPA100 amp. The KXPA100 manual states the station ground should be connected to the KXPA100 GND thumbscrew. I was just wondering since there are many cables connected between the two if the additional GND connection is truly necessary.
PS: This is my first attempt at communicating on the list and I just wanted to say how helpful it has been. I have spent many hours searching and getting information perviously posted. Thanks, Paul N1PEB ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
I just bought a KXPA100 and I'm not using any "ground" between it and
the KX3. My station is on the second floor and I use a balanced antenna in my attic so I don't have either a "station ground" beyond the house wiring's 3rd prong nor do I have an "RF ground." I have no problems and no RFI either. I'll be interested in whatever answers are posted here. 73, Stan WB2LQF On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Paul Bousquet wrote: > Just wondering how important it is to have connect the GND terminals > between the KX3 and the KXPA100 amp. The KXPA100 manual states the > station ground should be connected to the KXPA100 GND thumbscrew. I > was just wondering since there are many cables connected between the > two if the additional GND connection is truly necessary. > > PS: This is my first attempt at communicating on the list and I just > wanted to say how helpful it has been. I have spent many hours > searching and getting information perviously posted. > > Thanks, Paul > N1PEB > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Paul Bousquet
Paul,
It is wise to bond the KXPA100 to the station ground to combat noise and RFI. In fact bonding everything in the station together with heavy wire or braid can cure many "strange happenings". Other than that, you are correct that there is no need from a signalling connection standpoint to bond the KX3 to the KXPA100. Bonding the station equipment together and to a station ground point is to keep all the gear at the same potential and can assist with such things as extraneous noise pickup, stray RF and other electrical annoyances. While on the subject of grounding, remember that NEC code requires that all ground rods and wires be connected back to the utility ground rod with heavy gauge wire (#6 or larger). This is a safety consideration and has nothing to do with the proper functioning of your equipment. 73, Don W3FPR PS: Your first post is just fine. On 11/25/2014 10:36 AM, Paul Bousquet wrote: > Just wondering how important it is to have connect the GND terminals between the KX3 and the KXPA100 amp. The KXPA100 manual states the station ground should be connected to the KXPA100 GND thumbscrew. I was just wondering since there are many cables connected between the two if the additional GND connection is truly necessary. > > PS: This is my first attempt at communicating on the list and I just wanted to say how helpful it has been. I have spent many hours searching and getting information perviously posted. > > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
On Tue,11/25/2014 8:08 AM, Don Wilhelm wrote:
> Bonding the station equipment together and to a station ground point > is to keep all the gear at the same potential and can assist with such > things as extraneous noise pickup, stray RF and other electrical > annoyances. Excellent advice. And there are other good reasons. Here's a talk I did this fall at Pacificon on the topic of grounding and bonding. http://k9yc.com/GroundingAndAudio.pdf 73, Jim K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
Hi all,
One additional comment regarding grounding for RF interference, extraneous noise & elecrical safety considerations is that the preferred method for grounding should be: Single point grounding, ie all rig & amplifier ground connections should be taken from a single point, (shack grounding buss). Relying on "daisy chain" grounding for example: through coax cable(s) & their connectors; Rig > Amp > tuner > tground point can be the source of intermittent RFI & distortion problems that can be difficult to nail. This approach to grounding should NOT be used for the foregoing stated reasons. Eric, VK3AX. Retired EMC engineer. On 11/26/2014 4:21 AM, Jim Brown wrote: > On Tue,11/25/2014 8:08 AM, Don Wilhelm wrote: >> Bonding the station equipment together and to a station ground point >> is to keep all the gear at the same potential and can assist with >> such things as extraneous noise pickup, stray RF and other electrical >> annoyances. > > Excellent advice. And there are other good reasons. > > Here's a talk I did this fall at Pacificon on the topic of grounding > and bonding. > > http://k9yc.com/GroundingAndAudio.pdf > > 73, Jim K9YC > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
On Tue,11/25/2014 2:46 PM, Eric Buggee wrote:
> One additional comment regarding grounding for RF interference, > extraneous noise & elecrical safety considerations is that the > preferred method for grounding should be: > > Single point grounding, ie all rig & amplifier ground connections > should be taken from a single point, (shack grounding buss). There is a significant fallacy in this. See the linked tutorial. 73, Jim K9YC Vice-Chair Audio Engineering Society Standards Committee WG on EMC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Eric Buggee; VK3AX
Eric,
In many cases, the problem being dealt with is the currents flowing through the "grounds" and complicated by what K9YC refers to as the "pin 1 problem" in that the connectors for audio and RF paths are grounded to the circuit boards, but not to the enclosure (the enclosure *should* shield the boards and inter-connects, but it does not in modern gear). While a single point star grounding system may be best from an EMC point of view, it is not the best for noise reduction and 'sneak paths' in the gear we deal with in a ham station. In fact the multiple paths to that single point ground can create currents in the grounding system giving rise to noise in the gear that we are trying to reduce the noise. Review Jim's presentation on grounding in entirety. Jim does speak from many years of experience dealing with noise and sneak paths in professional audio installations, and I respect his opinions based on his years of experience dealing with these issues. If you have no ground current induced noise and are only striving for a lightning protection grounding scheme, then yes, the single point grounding system is the way to go, but that is not the situation in the modern ham station where we have to deal with audio and digital paths to/from computers, interface devices, ancillary gear and "who knows what" to the transceiver. Bonding all equipment together (with a mind to the path for the audio and RF) will minimize the extraneous noise currents on the shields between the boxes in the shack which will reduce the noise level in the receiver. I too have years of experience with design and testing for EMC considerations, and as I have indicated, each method of grounding has its place, but we are not dealing with EMC considerations alone. 73, Don W3FPR On 11/25/2014 5:46 PM, Eric Buggee wrote: > Hi all, > > One additional comment regarding grounding for RF interference, > extraneous noise & elecrical safety considerations is that the > preferred method for grounding should be: > > Single point grounding, ie all rig & amplifier ground connections > should be taken from a single point, (shack grounding buss). > > Relying on "daisy chain" grounding for example: through coax > cable(s) & their connectors; Rig > Amp > tuner > tground point can be > the source of intermittent RFI & distortion > > problems that can be difficult to nail. This approach to > grounding should NOT be used for the foregoing stated reasons. > > Eric, VK3AX. Retired EMC engineer. > > > > On 11/26/2014 4:21 AM, Jim Brown wrote: >> On Tue,11/25/2014 8:08 AM, Don Wilhelm wrote: >>> Bonding the station equipment together and to a station ground point >>> is to keep all the gear at the same potential and can assist with >>> such things as extraneous noise pickup, stray RF and other >>> electrical annoyances. >> >> Excellent advice. And there are other good reasons. >> >> Here's a talk I did this fall at Pacificon on the topic of grounding >> and bonding. >> >> http://k9yc.com/GroundingAndAudio.pdf >> >> 73, Jim K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
On Tue,11/25/2014 3:22 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote:
> While a single point star grounding system may be best from an EMC > point of view, The meaning of a single point star grounding system is badly misunderstood. Likewise, the difference between grounding and bonding is badly misunderstood. A connection to earth is NOT part of a solution to RFI/EMC issues. Proper BONDING IS. And the method I've shown in the tutorial IS best for EMC and for lightning. Remember -- EMC goes from DC To daylight! About ten years ago, I consulted to a mic manufacturer about RFI from cell phones to audio systems in meeting rooms of the US House of Representatives. The primary coupling mechanism was a Pin One Problem in the FET follower line driver for the electret mics. The cell phones were running 1W or less, pulse modulated, in the ranges of 900 MHz and above. 73, Jim K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
