General coverage bandpa

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

General coverage bandpa

Edward R Cole
Harlan,

I chose the main receiver since I assumed most casual listening
outside the ham bands would not involve both Rx.  Also, I use the
main receiver on the 500-KHz band for operating with an experimental
license.  The general coverage board is required to operate out of a
ham band in TEST mode.  That is how I transmit on the 600 meter band;
taking 1mw level RF to drive a modified surplus NDB transmitter (the
K3 replaces the original xtal osc.).

But I guess it would reduce to a personal decision for deciding which
receiver to install it in.

73, Ed - KL7UW

From: Harlan <[hidden email]>
To: Elecraft Email <[hidden email]>
Subject: [Elecraft] General coverage bandpass module
Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

For those with the sub receiver and only one bandpass module...

Which receiver is it assigned to and why did you pick that receiver?

Harlan
NC3C

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: General coverage bandpa

Joe Subich, W4TV-4

I put BPF boards in both receivers but if I had only one it would
go in the sub RX.  1) I am more likely to use the out of band Rx
for listening to the "AM Band" and using the Sub RX with a separate
antenna eliminates the losses associated with the pin diode T/R switch.
2) I am likely to want to use the main RX for normal ham operations
while listening to something else (WWV, route weather, SW BC, etc.)
and having the second RX available for the SWLing even when using the
transceiver normally "just makes sense".

On the other hand, if I had a need to *transmit* outside the ham bands
I would have no choice other than to put the BPF in the main RX.

73,

    ... Joe, W4TV


On 3/11/2013 3:15 PM, Edward R Cole wrote:

> Harlan,
>
> I chose the main receiver since I assumed most casual listening outside
> the ham bands would not involve both Rx.  Also, I use the main receiver
> on the 500-KHz band for operating with an experimental license.  The
> general coverage board is required to operate out of a ham band in TEST
> mode.  That is how I transmit on the 600 meter band; taking 1mw level RF
> to drive a modified surplus NDB transmitter (the K3 replaces the
> original xtal osc.).
>
> But I guess it would reduce to a personal decision for deciding which
> receiver to install it in.
>
> 73, Ed - KL7UW
>
> From: Harlan <[hidden email]>
> To: Elecraft Email <[hidden email]>
> Subject: [Elecraft] General coverage bandpass module
> Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> For those with the sub receiver and only one bandpass module...
>
> Which receiver is it assigned to and why did you pick that receiver?
>
> Harlan
> NC3C
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html