Ham bands vs GC receive

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
6 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Ham bands vs GC receive

Bill VanAlstyne W5WVO
I'm still not clear on the general-coverage receive option -- if it is indeed "optional" or available by default in a minimally configured radio. What exactly is the "general coverage filter" and why is it necessary? Is the GC receive path a separate one from the ham bands path (maybe an up-conversion IF path?), thus requiring its own filter? If so, what are the characteristics of the GC filter (IF frequency, poles, bandwidth)? Is this the only filter installable for GC receive?

Bill / W5WVO
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Ham bands vs GC receive

wayne burdick
Administrator
Hi Bill,

> I'm still not clear on the general-coverage receive option -- if it is
> indeed "optional" or available by default in a minimally configured
> radio.

The basic radio, as well as the subreceiver, have a full array of
ham-band-only filters at the front end. This is to ensure excellent
performance in the ham bands. These filters are switched in by means of
relays.

The KBPF3 option is a small plug-in module that sits above the ham-band
filters. It, too, has a number of filters switched in by relays. The
difference is that these are wider filters, covering all of the area
between the ham bands. But they share the same input/output path as the
ham-band filters. When not selected, the GC filters have absolutely no
effect on performance, thanks to a very careful layout that minimizes
trace lengths.

When you tune the radio well outside the ham bands, an appropriate GC
filter is automatically selected by firmware.

> Is this the only filter installable for GC receive?

Yes, at present. You can install the KBPF3 on the main receiver or sub
receiver or both.

However, the K3 has that "modularity" thing we've been talking about,
so in theory we could design a different band-pass filter set for
special applications.

73,
Wayne
N6KR


---

http://www.elecraft.com

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re: Ham bands vs GC receive

Jesse
What frequency range will the GC have? The only reason
left to keep my Icom 735.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com 
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Ham bands vs GC receive

wayne burdick
Administrator

On Apr 29, 2007, at 8:55 AM, Jesse Justiss wrote:

> What frequency range will the GC have? The only reason
> left to keep my Icom 735.

0.5 to 30.0 MHz.

73,
Wayne
N6KR


---

http://www.elecraft.com

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re: Ham bands vs GC receive

Paul Clay-2
Could you comment on the expected audio output quality
of the K3?  Besides ESSB performance possibilities,
I'm wondering if the K3 will make a great shortwave
broadcast receiver, along the lines of Drake R8.  I
noticed that its to include synchronous AM detection;
I'm just wondering how extensive and flat an audio
output response the K3 will allow.

- Paul, N6LQ


--- wayne burdick <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> On Apr 29, 2007, at 8:55 AM, Jesse Justiss wrote:
>
> > What frequency range will the GC have? The only
> reason
> > left to keep my Icom 735.
>
> 0.5 to 30.0 MHz.
>
> 73,
> Wayne
> N6KR
>
>
> ---
>
> http://www.elecraft.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to: [hidden email]
> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
>  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   
>
>
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com 
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Ham bands vs GC receive

wayne burdick
Administrator
Hi Paul,

The K3 performs very well as a SW broadcast RX. The DSP I.F. and A.F.
have very low distortion, and you can adjust the passband with our
8-band RX EQ. It will do both envelope and synchronous AM detection.

At some point we'll have AM performance numbers to post.

73,
Wayne
N6KR



On Apr 29, 2007, at 10:12 AM, Paul Clay wrote:

> Could you comment on the expected audio output quality
> of the K3?  Besides ESSB performance possibilities,
> I'm wondering if the K3 will make a great shortwave
> broadcast receiver, along the lines of Drake R8.  I
> noticed that its to include synchronous AM detection;
> I'm just wondering how extensive and flat an audio
> output response the K3 will allow.
>
> - Paul, N6LQ
>
>
> --- wayne burdick <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 29, 2007, at 8:55 AM, Jesse Justiss wrote:
>>
>>> What frequency range will the GC have? The only
>> reason
>>> left to keep my Icom 735.
>>
>> 0.5 to 30.0 MHz.
>>
>> 73,
>> Wayne
>> N6KR
>>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> http://www.elecraft.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Post to: [hidden email]
>> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
>> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
>>  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>
>>
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
>> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>

---

http://www.elecraft.com

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com