|
After this past week ends NAQP contest and receiving several notices
about distorted audio on my K3/10 using a Telex MRB2400 aviation headset. It might be time to up grade my head set to either one of the above. Frankly the Telex becomes rather heavy after about 6 hours. Since I operate pretty much equally between contesting and general DX chasing and/or QSO I need a good all around headset. I would like to hear from someone who has operated with all of them. Thanks RC kc5wa ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
Your best choise will be the already well known Yamaha CM-500 that me and many other group users has purchased as well,you will pay no more than $45 and even less depending on which store you will buy it at,its freq response is from 100 to 18,000Hz on TX and 20 to 20,000Hz on RX,having the K3 EQ you can equalize it to have either sweet ragchew audio or high punch dx/contesting audio,the headphones are big enough to cover your whole ear and confortable for hours of listening,the mic audio is so high that you have to reduce the mic gain at least half,go for it,its a keeper.
AD4C "For a refined ham it is compulsory to own a k3" --- On Tue, 1/19/10, Robert 'RC' Conley <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Robert 'RC' Conley <[hidden email]> Subject: [Elecraft] Heil HC-4, HC-5 & Yamaha CM500 To: [hidden email] Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 2:36 PM After this past week ends NAQP contest and receiving several notices about distorted audio on my K3/10 using a Telex MRB2400 aviation headset. It might be time to up grade my head set to either one of the above. Frankly the Telex becomes rather heavy after about 6 hours. Since I operate pretty much equally between contesting and general DX chasing and/or QSO I need a good all around headset. I would like to hear from someone who has operated with all of them. Thanks RC kc5wa ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by Robert 'RC' Conley
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 08:36:25 -0600, Robert 'RC' Conley wrote:
>I would like to hear from someone who has operated with all of >them. I've never owned a Heil headset because I think they are wildly overpriced and many sound bad. I've used Heil headsets at the N6RO contest station when others brought them. I found them moderately comfortable, but the headphones in the active ones (noise cancelling) picked up transmitted RF from antennas that were 100-200 ft from the shack. I bought two CM500s as part of a group purchase by our local contest club two months ago (Altogether, I think we bought about two dozen), and I have used one extensively in a half dozen contests. I'm a serious contester, so that often means 24 hours or more in a weekend. I find them to be as comfortable as my Sony MDR7506s, they sound nearly as good, and the mic gives me VERY competitve, good sounding audio. I've listened to other club members using these headset mics, and they sound much better than most of the Heils I've heard. 73, Jim Brown K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
The new noise cancelling Heil's are supposed to be better at not picking up
transmitted rf. I have one of the old ones which pick up the transmitted rf and really annoying. I have always used the Heil headsets and elements. My voice seems to work well with them. I always get excellent reports. I would agree that their prices are high. Mike W0MU CC Packet Cluster W0MU-1 W0MU.NET or 67.40.148.194 -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Jim Brown Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 8:54 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Heil HC-4, HC-5 & Yamaha CM500 On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 08:36:25 -0600, Robert 'RC' Conley wrote: >I would like to hear from someone who has operated with all of them. I've never owned a Heil headset because I think they are wildly overpriced and many sound bad. I've used Heil headsets at the N6RO contest station when others brought them. I found them moderately comfortable, but the headphones in the active ones (noise cancelling) picked up transmitted RF from antennas that were 100-200 ft from the shack. I bought two CM500s as part of a group purchase by our local contest club two months ago (Altogether, I think we bought about two dozen), and I have used one extensively in a half dozen contests. I'm a serious contester, so that often means 24 hours or more in a weekend. I find them to be as comfortable as my Sony MDR7506s, they sound nearly as good, and the mic gives me VERY competitve, good sounding audio. I've listened to other club members using these headset mics, and they sound much better than most of the Heils I've heard. 73, Jim Brown K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by AD4C2009
Where do you find them for 45 bucks? Everything I see so far says 58
to 60 bucks. Stan Rife W5EWA -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Hector Padron Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 9:25 AM To: Robert 'RC' Conley Cc: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Heil HC-4, HC-5 & Yamaha CM500 Your best choise will be the already well known Yamaha CM-500 that me and many other group users has purchased as well,you will pay no more than $45 and even less depending on which store you will buy it at,its freq response is from 100 to 18,000Hz on TX and 20 to 20,000Hz on RX,having the K3 EQ you can equalize it to have either sweet ragchew audio or high punch dx/contesting audio,the headphones are big enough to cover your whole ear and confortable for hours of listening,the mic audio is so high that you have to reduce the mic gain at least half,go for it,its a keeper. AD4C "For a refined ham it is compulsory to own a k3" --- On Tue, 1/19/10, Robert 'RC' Conley <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Robert 'RC' Conley <[hidden email]> Subject: [Elecraft] Heil HC-4, HC-5 & Yamaha CM500 To: [hidden email] Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 2:36 PM After this past week ends NAQP contest and receiving several notices about distorted audio on my K3/10 using a Telex MRB2400 aviation headset. It might be time to up grade my head set to either one of the above. Frankly the Telex becomes rather heavy after about 6 hours. Since I operate pretty much equally between contesting and general DX chasing and/or QSO I need a good all around headset. I would like to hear from someone who has operated with all of them. Thanks RC kc5wa ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by w0mu
I have been using the CM-500 for 3 days already,always using 1KW from my AL-80B on 40M with a dipole and on 20M with an AV3 vertical antenna and so far I don't have any RFI anywhere,they are RF safe for me.
AD4C "For a refined ham it is compulsory to own a k3" --- On Tue, 1/19/10, W0MU Mike Fatchett <[hidden email]> wrote: From: W0MU Mike Fatchett <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Heil HC-4, HC-5 & Yamaha CM500 To: [hidden email] Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 4:01 PM The new noise cancelling Heil's are supposed to be better at not picking up transmitted rf. I have one of the old ones which pick up the transmitted rf and really annoying. I have always used the Heil headsets and elements. My voice seems to work well with them. I always get excellent reports. I would agree that their prices are high. Mike W0MU CC Packet Cluster W0MU-1 W0MU.NET or 67.40.148.194 -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Jim Brown Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 8:54 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Heil HC-4, HC-5 & Yamaha CM500 On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 08:36:25 -0600, Robert 'RC' Conley wrote: >I would like to hear from someone who has operated with all of them. I've never owned a Heil headset because I think they are wildly overpriced and many sound bad. I've used Heil headsets at the N6RO contest station when others brought them. I found them moderately comfortable, but the headphones in the active ones (noise cancelling) picked up transmitted RF from antennas that were 100-200 ft from the shack. I bought two CM500s as part of a group purchase by our local contest club two months ago (Altogether, I think we bought about two dozen), and I have used one extensively in a half dozen contests. I'm a serious contester, so that often means 24 hours or more in a weekend. I find them to be as comfortable as my Sony MDR7506s, they sound nearly as good, and the mic gives me VERY competitve, good sounding audio. I've listened to other club members using these headset mics, and they sound much better than most of the Heils I've heard. 73, Jim Brown K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by srife
> Where do you find them for 45 bucks? WWW.bhphotovideo.com The one issue with the microphone in the CM-500 is that it has much more low frequency response than either the HC-5 or the HC-4. Unless you want to waste a lot of power in useless low frequency audio response, the CM-500 will require a significant amount of TX EQ while the HC5/HC4 can be used without eq. 73, ... Joe, W4TV > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] > [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of > [hidden email] > Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 1:53 PM > To: [hidden email] > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Heil HC-4, HC-5 & Yamaha CM500 > > > Where do you find them for 45 bucks? Everything I see > so far says 58 to 60 bucks. > > > Stan Rife > W5EWA > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] > [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Hector Padron > Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 9:25 AM > To: Robert 'RC' Conley > Cc: [hidden email] > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Heil HC-4, HC-5 & Yamaha CM500 > > Your best choise will be the already well known Yamaha CM-500 > that me and many other group users has purchased as well,you > will pay no more than $45 and even less depending on which > store you will buy it at,its freq response is from 100 to > 18,000Hz on TX and 20 to 20,000Hz on RX,having the K3 EQ you > can equalize it to have either sweet ragchew audio or high > punch dx/contesting audio,the headphones are big enough to > cover your whole ear and confortable for hours of > listening,the mic audio is so high that you have to reduce > the mic gain at least half,go for it,its a keeper. > > > AD4C > > > > "For a refined ham it is compulsory to own a k3" > > --- On Tue, 1/19/10, Robert 'RC' Conley <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > From: Robert 'RC' Conley <[hidden email]> > Subject: [Elecraft] Heil HC-4, HC-5 & Yamaha CM500 > To: [hidden email] > Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 2:36 PM > > > After this past week ends NAQP contest and receiving several > notices about distorted audio on my K3/10 using a Telex > MRB2400 aviation headset. It might be time to up grade my > head set to either one of the above. Frankly the Telex > becomes rather heavy after about 6 hours. Since I operate > pretty much equally between contesting and general DX chasing > and/or QSO I need a good all around headset. I would like to > hear from someone who has operated with all of them. Thanks > RC kc5wa > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by srife
Got one today for $44.39 at:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/375558-REG/Yamaha_CM500_CM500_Headset_with.html On 1/19/2010 1:52 PM, [hidden email] wrote: > Where do you find them for 45 bucks? Everything I see so far says 58 > to 60 bucks. > > > Stan Rife > W5EWA > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] > [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Hector Padron > Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 9:25 AM > To: Robert 'RC' Conley > Cc: [hidden email] > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Heil HC-4, HC-5& Yamaha CM500 > > Your best choise will be the already well known Yamaha CM-500 that me and > many other group users has purchased as well,you will pay no more than $45 > and even less depending on which store you will buy it at,its freq response > is from 100 to 18,000Hz on TX and 20 to 20,000Hz on RX,having the K3 EQ you > can equalize it to have either sweet ragchew audio or high punch > dx/contesting audio,the headphones are big enough to cover your whole ear > and confortable for hours of listening,the mic audio is so high that you > have to reduce the mic gain at least half,go for it,its a keeper. > > > AD4C > > > > "For a refined ham it is compulsory to own a k3" > > --- On Tue, 1/19/10, Robert 'RC' Conley<[hidden email]> wrote: > > > From: Robert 'RC' Conley<[hidden email]> > Subject: [Elecraft] Heil HC-4, HC-5& Yamaha CM500 > To: [hidden email] > Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 2:36 PM > > > After this past week ends NAQP contest and receiving several notices > about distorted audio on my K3/10 using a Telex MRB2400 aviation > headset. It might be time to up grade my head set to either one of the > above. Frankly the Telex becomes rather heavy after about 6 hours. > Since I operate pretty much equally between contesting and general DX > chasing and/or QSO I need a good all around headset. I would like to > hear from someone who has operated with all of them. > Thanks RC kc5wa > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by Joe Subich, W4TV-4
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:47:03 -0500, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
>The one issue with the microphone in the CM-500 is that >it has much more low frequency response than either the >HC-5 or the HC-4. Unless you want to waste a lot of power >in useless low frequency audio response, the CM-500 will >require a significant amount of TX EQ while the HC5/HC4 >can be used without eq. Are you basing this on actual observations, or on frequency range numbers on a datasheet? All I'm doing with mine is cutting the bottom two octave bands to minimize breath pops, and I would do that with ANY mic. This setting was arrived at by critical reports from audio-conscious hams, and by listening to others and helping them adjust their TXEQ. 73, Jim K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
> Are you basing this on actual observations, or on frequency > range numbers on a datasheet? Based on posted spectral displays the CM-500 appears to have somewhat extended low frequency response with a slightly falling characteristic where the HC5 has a slight rising characteristic (about 3dB/octave) and the HC4 has a more strongly rising characteristic (about 5dB/octave) with a sharper low frequency roll-off. > All I'm doing with mine is cutting the bottom two octave > bands to minimize breath pops, and I would do that with > ANY mic. Killing both the 50 and 100 Hz bands is a given with nearly any mic due to the proximity effect (bass boost) when they are "close talked" as they are in a headset. However, given what I've seen of the CM-500, I would be tempted to start with a +6 at 1.60, +10 at 2.4 and +10 at 3.2 (6 dB/octave from 1000-2400 with a shelving response above that). I will know for sure when mine arrives later in the week. BTW, I also like to drop 800 Hz by 6-10dB to reduce noise in the interformat gap. 73, ... Joe, W4TV > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] > [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Jim Brown > Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 5:17 PM > To: [hidden email] > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Heil HC-4, HC-5 & Yamaha CM500 > > > On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:47:03 -0500, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote: > > >The one issue with the microphone in the CM-500 is that > >it has much more low frequency response than either the > >HC-5 or the HC-4. Unless you want to waste a lot of power > >in useless low frequency audio response, the CM-500 will > >require a significant amount of TX EQ while the HC5/HC4 > >can be used without eq. > > Are you basing this on actual observations, or on frequency > range numbers on a datasheet? All I'm doing with mine is > cutting the bottom two octave bands to minimize breath > pops, and I would do that with ANY mic. This setting was > arrived at by critical reports from audio-conscious hams, > and by listening to others and helping them adjust their > TXEQ. > > 73, > > Jim K9YC > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
