High Stability Reference Oscillator

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

High Stability Reference Oscillator

David Ahrendts
Pros: what is the operating advantage of the KTCXO3-1 1 PPM reference oscillator over the standard ‘ol bargain basement 5 PPM ref osc supplied with my lovely new K3S?



David Ahrendts   [hidden email]  




______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: High Stability Reference Oscillator

Don Wilhelm-4
David,

Greater temperature stability.  If you are not operating data modes like
JT65 which has long term transmit times, and your shack is at a
reasonable stable temperature, one should be as good as the other.

73,
Don W3FPR

On 8/2/2015 5:41 PM, David Ahrendts wrote:

> Pros: what is the operating advantage of the KTCXO3-1 1 PPM reference oscillator over the standard ‘ol bargain basement 5 PPM ref osc supplied with my lovely new K3S?
>
>
>
> David Ahrendts   [hidden email]
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to [hidden email]

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: High Stability Reference Oscillator

Guy Olinger K2AV
In reply to this post by David Ahrendts
If it bothers you if your K3S drift just a tiny bit warming up, or it
bothers you if your 10MHz WWV is not absolutely dead on all the time,
or if you are operating 6 and 2 meters, you fix that with the
KTCXO3-1, or get the stuff to sync your K3S with GPS derived 10 MHz.

From quite some number of posts, in the end a lot of people want their
K3 absolutely dead on all the time. It just bothers them if it's not.

Operating advantage? None on the lower bands. VHF frequencies are
another matter.

I bought the KTCXO3-1 because I previously finally installed the
equivalent in my FT1000MP.

In the end, it's druthers or a requirement for a specialized operating mode.

73, Guy K2AV

On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 5:41 PM, David Ahrendts <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Pros: what is the operating advantage of the KTCXO3-1 1 PPM reference oscillator over the standard ‘ol bargain basement 5 PPM ref osc supplied with my lovely new K3S?
>
>
>
> David Ahrendts   [hidden email]
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to [hidden email]
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: High Stability Reference Oscillator

Bob McGraw - K4TAX
In reply to this post by David Ahrendts
On 10M {28 MHz} a 0.5 PPM can have +/-14 Hz error while a 5 PPM can have
a +/- 140 Hz error.  It is the frequency in MHz  x the PPM which is
Parts Per Million.

My article scheduled for publication in September QST discusses the
frequency read out of today's radios and their likely inaccuracy.

73 Bob, K4TAX


On 8/2/2015 4:41 PM, David Ahrendts wrote:

> Pros: what is the operating advantage of the KTCXO3-1 1 PPM reference oscillator over the standard ‘ol bargain basement 5 PPM ref osc supplied with my lovely new K3S?
>
>
>
> David Ahrendts   [hidden email]
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to [hidden email]


______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]