Hello,
I think I might have a problem with K2 7109. I arranged to call another K2 owner on 40 meters and was not heard, additionally I did not receive his call. So I'm not sure if it was propagation or my radio. What makes me wonder is I have called on the SKCC Elmer frequencies with no response over the last few days at different times of the day. I have another receiver that seems to pick up my transmissions but I don't know if that would be a really good check if things are working as they should. So where do I go from here? 73, Ed KE7HGA |
It could well be band conditions. What do you have for an antenna? How far
away was the other station? If you have a watt meter, you might check to see you are getting the proper power output. Check all the settings, for example having RIT or XIT on unexpectedly might make getting contacts difficult. 73 - Mike WA8BXN -------Original Message------- From: EMD Date: 08/11/11 21:12:26 To: [hidden email] Subject: [Elecraft] I don't think I'm getting out Hello, I think I might have a problem with K2 7109. I arranged to call another K2 Owner on 40 meters and was not heard, additionally I did not receive his Call. So I'm not sure if it was propagation or my radio. What makes me Wonder is I have called on the SKCC Elmer frequencies with no response over The last few days at different times of the day. I have another receiver That seems to pick up my transmissions but I don't know if that would be a Really good check if things are working as they should. So where do I go from here? 73, Ed KE7HGA ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Hello Mike,
The station I was trying to contact is 425 miles to the Northwest of my location. 40m propagation seemed good, I was receiving other stations on 40m. I'm using a long wire for now and was putting 3 watts out according to the power reading. I don't have a watt meter but MFJ has a QRP meter which I'm going to buy unless you can recommend a better one. I don't think RIT or XIT was active. Thanks for the reply, 73, Ed KE7HGA |
In reply to this post by EMD
Ed,
First trial, connect a dummy load and do a TUNE - what does the K2 display tell you? It should be close to the requested power and with an SWR of 1.0. If your dummy load is the Elecraft DL1, measure the voltage at the diode and calculate the power output from that. The above will tell you if your K2 is capable of driving a 50 ohm load. Next, tune your antenna (using an antenna analyzer) to indicate 50 ohms resistive and as close to zero ohms reactive as you can obtain. If the K2 worked into the dummy load, it should also load that tuned antenna load. All the rest depends on propagation. If you are working with another ham where you also have an alternate communications path (telephone or email or VHF), try increasing your power until you are heard - or start at 10 or 12 watts and work until you cannot be heard. A lot depends on the ambient noise level at the receiving location - your signal must have enough power at the receiving antenna to be greater than that noise level. 73, Don W3FPR On 8/11/2011 9:12 PM, EMD wrote: > Hello, > > I think I might have a problem with K2 7109. I arranged to call another K2 > owner on 40 meters and was not heard, additionally I did not receive his > call. So I'm not sure if it was propagation or my radio. What makes me > wonder is I have called on the SKCC Elmer frequencies with no response over > the last few days at different times of the day. I have another receiver > that seems to pick up my transmissions but I don't know if that would be a > really good check if things are working as they should. > > So where do I go from here? > > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Don,
I do have the Elecraft dummy load so I will look into that. I will also try going to 10 watts and work down. I don't have an antenna analyzer at this time, sounds like something else I will need to pick up. I'm using a 32' wire with a 16' counterpose which is hanging out an upstairs window horizontally. 73, Ed KE7HGA |
Ed,
A 32' wire with a 16' counterpoise is not a resonant antenna on 40 meters. It will not load well unless you have an antenna tuner to turn it into 50 ohms. I have a KAT2 in my K2 #1239 to allow me to use "miscellaneous" antennas. I am assuming that by your calling it a "counterpoise" it is not laying on the ground. A counterpoise laying on the ground is a special case that has all kinds of loss issues to work around to prevent overwhelmingly bad results. See what happens when you lengthen the counterpoise to 32 feet. It does not have to be in a straight line and can be bent to get the length. 73, Guy. On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:11 PM, EMD <[hidden email]> wrote: > Don, > > I do have the Elecraft dummy load so I will look into that. I will also try > going to 10 watts and work down. > > I don't have an antenna analyzer at this time, sounds like something else I > will need to pick up. > > I'm using a 32' wire with a 16' counterpose which is hanging out an upstairs > window horizontally. > > 73, > Ed KE7HGA > > -- > View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/I-don-t-think-I-m-getting-out-tp6678845p6678986.html > Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by EMD
Ed,
As an alternative to the antenna analyzer, use TUNE on the K2 and adjust the antenna tuning unit for the lowest SWR possible - note what that is - and if it is 1.0, the K2 will indicate the power output properly. Note that the base K2 uses only a diode detector. What that means is if the antenna impedance is anything other than 50 ohms resistive, the actual power and the power level that is controlled by the K2 may be vastly different. The KAT2 adds a true wattmeter function that is relatively independent of SWR (if properly balanced and calibrated). 73, Don W3FPR On 8/11/2011 10:11 PM, EMD wrote: > Don, > > I do have the Elecraft dummy load so I will look into that. I will also try > going to 10 watts and work down. > > I don't have an antenna analyzer at this time, sounds like something else I > will need to pick up. > > I'm using a 32' wire with a 16' counterpose which is hanging out an upstairs > window horizontally. > > 73, > Ed KE7HGA > > -- > View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/I-don-t-think-I-m-getting-out-tp6678845p6678986.html > Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Guy, K2AV
Guy
Thanks for the advice. I think I'm getting out okay. I hooked up my MFJ-267 Watt meter dummy load and when I have the power set to 10 watts I'm getting close to 10 watts forward but the reflected is about 5 so that tells me the antenna is the issue. I have a KAT2 ready to install so I would bet I will get better results once I install the tuner. I will lengthen the counterpoise to 32' and see what happens. Since I'm upstairs in a spare bedroom as an office /shack should I run the counterpoise on the floor, which I'm doing now or hang it out the window? I don't think hanging out the window is the right idea. Thanks again. 73, Ed ke7hga |
Ed,
Hanging it out the window is the best idea. That "counterpoise" is the other half of your 40 meter antenna - so if you want best results, put it up in the air at whatever height you can manage - treat it like an antenna radiator - because that is exactly what it is. Caution: an antenna with 32 foot elements each side of the feedpoint will present a high feedpoint impedance on 20 meters - so if you have trouble feeding it on 20, that is the problem. It should respond quite nicely on 15 meters where it is approximately 3/2 wavelengths long. The challenge is to use an antenna (or antenna and tuner combination) that will present a 50 ohm resistive load to the transceiver. In the old days of transmitters with PI network output tank circuits, we have enough matching capability in the transmitter output to allow tuning into a variety of loads. Modern transceivers are designed to operate properly into a 50 ohm load. The Tuning elements to match an antenna to that 50 ohm requirement have been moved into the ATU - whether that be a manual tuner or an automatic tuner. We still have to have some means of matching the output of the transmitter load impedance to the antenna feedpoint impedance. The alternate solution is to have a resonant dipole for each band that presents a 50 ohm load to the transmitter. That is not practical for everyone. Even the much acclaimed G5RV does not have an SWR of 1:1 on all bands. The reason I mention this is that the KAT2 will have the most trouble matching high impedance loads. As a compromise, extend both sides of the antenna to 44 feet, or better yet, use the W3EDP lengths of 85 feet with a 17 foot "counterpoise" - that will create something like an off-center-fed 80 meter antenna that is usable on most HF bands (with a tuner like the KAT2). 73, Don W3FPR On 8/11/2011 10:59 PM, EMD wrote: > Guy > > Thanks for the advice. I think I'm getting out okay. I hooked up my > MFJ-267 Watt meter dummy load and when I have the power set to 10 watts I'm > getting close to 10 watts forward but the reflected is about 5 so that tells > me the antenna is the issue. I have a KAT2 ready to install so I would bet > I will get better results once I install the tuner. I will lengthen the > counterpoise to 32' and see what happens. Since I'm upstairs in a spare > bedroom as an office /shack should I run the counterpoise on the floor, > which I'm doing now or hang it out the window? I don't think hanging out > the window is the right idea. > > Thanks again. > > 73, > Ed ke7hga > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Don,
Thanks for the information. I will follow your advice. I know the wire antenna is not the best but for the time being it's all I can come up with. I also think I will go ahead and install the KAT2 since it is complete and ready for installation and would solve some of my impedance issues. 73, Ed ke7hga |
85/17 or 43/9 is a good multiband antenna for use with a KAT2. I have
found my KAT2 capable of matching loads that I couldn't match with my stand-alone QRO tuners. I have a K2/10 with battery and KAT2 for all kinds of portable uses including my RV. I have a separate KPA100/KAT100 in an EC2 that I dock it with for home use. On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:51 AM, EMD <[hidden email]> wrote: > Don, > > Thanks for the information. I will follow your advice. I know the wire > antenna is not the best but for the time being it's all I can come up with. > I also think I will go ahead and install the KAT2 since it is complete and > ready for installation and would solve some of my impedance issues. > > 73, > Ed ke7hga > > -- > View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/I-don-t-think-I-m-getting-out-tp6678845p6679676.html > Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |