Insulated Backstay

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Insulated Backstay

AI4CQ ,James
There are 7 pages in the ARRL Antenna Book on HF antennas for
Sailboats showing configurations and patterns.

You must be planning on some world traveling to be interested in a
"Wetsnail 32".

James AI4CQ


_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft    Help:  http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Insulated Backstay

Don - W6CZ
Mike

The 23' feet dimension is specified because that is the shortest length
the tuners like the SGC230 and Icom AT120/130/140 AH2/3, etc., will load
on 2 MHz and 2.182 MHz is the "distress" frequency on Marine MF - though
not monitored much outside the US any more.

I have done computer modeling of a typical cruising boat - a Valiant 40
- and found that actually the BEST antenna was to only insulate the
bottom of the backstay and load the whole rig, AS DISCUSSED in the
current editions of the ARRL Antenna Book. But I got tired of arguing
with people that this would actually work - "But it is a short!" - as I
was advocating it long before the Antenna Book, and gave up. And - in
some cases it didn't work very well - on a ketch rig or with a "split"
backstay. On a sloop, with a single wire from the mast to the stern - it
is killer. In a lot of cases, we simply ran a 6 gauge wire back from the
base of the mast or the forestay to the ground of the tuner and jumpered
all the fitting toggles with wire for good continuity - forming a big
"loop". The one insulator was because without it, there would be a lot
of leakage from the chainplate at the feed point to ground after the
stern gets coated with salt spray (but some installations worked OK
without it anyway - Brian may recall Bill Parks' Islander 36 Stray Cat
Blues about 2 or 3 races ago and his effort before that - Bill
introduced the idea to me when he was interviewing me for an article in
Latitude 38. It was in a book that was published some years ago on Ham
Radio and Cruising and the author discussed not using insulators - at
first I too said it wouldn't work - then I thought about it for a
while).

For an insulated stay. a length of 45' seems to be (a stretch of the
word) "optimal" in that it is efficient on the lower frequencies yet not
too long so it maintains a decent angle of radiation on the higher
frequencies. In reality - an insulated backstay is a pretty poor antenna
when you look at the pattern as on most bands there are two pretty deep
nulls about 120 degrees off the bow. Fortunately - they are fairly
narrow. But you won't be able to achieve that length on a W32. A 23'
whip as typically used on a power boat and most multi-hulls has an
almost perfect omni pattern and a good launch angle - of course -
assuming the boat is upright in the water - which is often NOT the case
under way.

IN short - no matter what you do - it is a compromise and you would have
to work REALLY hard to screw it up so it wouldn't work as long as you
follow good engineering practices. I have never seen an Icom tuner fail
to load anything on any frequency - not the same can be said for the
SGC230 (but that seems to be a different problem where it just won't
tune sometimes without being reset) or certain SEA tuners (the 1635 will
not load a 1/4 wave on 4.146 MHz - the check-in frequency for the PacCup
race - go figure - and that is EXACTLY what they cut the backstay to on
a Santa Cruz 52 - I received panic calls from three boats just before
they were leaving on past Pacific Cups who had that tuner installed by
someone because it - with the companion SEA235 radio - was light weight
- didn't bother to check if it would work). SEA's other tuners (like the
1631) do not appear to have this problem and like the SGC, will work
with any radio.

As far as grounding - there are many methods - but the only one I can
say WILL work is bronze plates (drag is NOT an issue on a Westsail 32) -
I recommend 2 of the 3" x 12" - and I have close to 500 installations
now with no RFI problems running 150 watts using e-mail to back that up.

I am not saying other methods WON'T work - just that it is difficult to
predict the results and it can be a tremendous amount of work and
expense with poor results. One thing that has been determined is SOME
sort of direct sea-water contact is needed.

Don Melcher
W6CZ
HF Radio On Board
www.hfradio.com


_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft    Help:  http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Don
W6CZ
DM07bk
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Insulated Backstay

Ron D'Eau Claire-2
Don's idea for a loop with the backstay attached to the mast is GREAT! One
thing that anyone who hasn't been around the ocean fails to really
appreciate is just how H-A-R-D it is to keep insulators clean. There's a
reason the big ships use humungous glass insulators everywhere, and even
though they are usually way above the water line they salt up and turn into
resistors almost overnight!

The horror stories of trying to those babies clean are all true. Salt can be
tenacious stuff and it collects faster than bills on vacation.

Any system that avoids the need to have insulator(s) in hard-to-reach places
(like the top of the backstay) is worth considering.

I bet the op who said a loop is a "short" is from the same school that told
me that a linearly-loaded vertical using a helical element can't work
because it's a huge "RF Choke"!

Ron AC7AC

-----Original Message-----
...actually the BEST antenna was to only insulate the bottom of the backstay
and load the whole rig, AS DISCUSSED in the current editions of the ARRL
Antenna Book. But I got tired of arguing with people that this would
actually work - "But it is a short!" - as I was advocating it long before
the Antenna Book, and gave up. And - in some cases it didn't work very well
- on a ketch rig or with a "split" backstay. On a sloop, with a single wire
from the mast to the stern - it is killer. In a lot of cases, we simply ran
a 6 gauge wire back from the base of the mast or the forestay to the ground
of the tuner and jumpered all the fitting toggles with wire for good
continuity - forming a big "loop". The one insulator was because without it,
there would be a lot of leakage from the chainplate at the feed point to
ground after the stern gets coated with salt spray (but some installations
worked OK without it anyway - Brian may recall Bill Parks' Islander 36 Stray
Cat Blues about 2 or 3 races ago and his effort before that - Bill
introduced the idea to me when he was interviewing me for an article in
Latitude 38. It was in a book that was published some years ago on Ham Radio
and Cruising and the author discussed not using insulators - at first I too
said it wouldn't work - then I thought about it for a while).
...I am not saying other methods WON'T work - just that it is difficult to
predict the results and it can be a tremendous amount of work and expense
with poor results. One thing that has been determined is SOME sort of direct
sea-water contact is needed.

Don Melcher
W6CZ
HF Radio On Board
www.hfradio.com



_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft    Help:  http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Insulated Backstay

brianboschma
In reply to this post by Don - W6CZ
Don,

I did this for a time on my 34' boat. It worked with the SGC tuner (not
too suprising) and I made contacts. It had the added advantage of
lighting all the LED's on the boats power panel, a great indication of
radiated power, and woke up the off watch crew that were sleeping with
their hand against the chain plates where the standing rigging feeds
through the deck. Oh, and the other cool phenomena was the way the
autopilot would go offline on voice peaks leaving the boat to round up
with the spinnaker wrapping and flayling away against the head stay.

Brian n6iz/mm  s/v redsky


Don Melcher wrote:

>Mike
>
>The 23' feet dimension is specified because that is the shortest length
>the tuners like the SGC230 and Icom AT120/130/140 AH2/3, etc., will load
>on 2 MHz and 2.182 MHz is the "distress" frequency on Marine MF - though
>not monitored much outside the US any more.
>
>I have done computer modeling of a typical cruising boat - a Valiant 40
>- and found that actually the BEST antenna was to only insulate the
>bottom of the backstay and load the whole rig, AS DISCUSSED in the
>current editions of the ARRL Antenna Book. But I got tired of arguing
>with people that this would actually work - "But it is a short!" - as I
>was advocating it long before the Antenna Book, and gave up. And - in
>some cases it didn't work very well - on a ketch rig or with a "split"
>backstay. On a sloop, with a single wire from the mast to the stern - it
>is killer. In a lot of cases, we simply ran a 6 gauge wire back from the
>base of the mast or the forestay to the ground of the tuner and jumpered
>all the fitting toggles with wire for good continuity - forming a big
>"loop". The one insulator was because without it, there would be a lot
>of leakage from the chainplate at the feed point to ground after the
>stern gets coated with salt spray (but some installations worked OK
>without it anyway - Brian may recall Bill Parks' Islander 36 Stray Cat
>Blues about 2 or 3 races ago and his effort before that - Bill
>introduced the idea to me when he was interviewing me for an article in
>Latitude 38. It was in a book that was published some years ago on Ham
>Radio and Cruising and the author discussed not using insulators - at
>first I too said it wouldn't work - then I thought about it for a
>while).
>
>For an insulated stay. a length of 45' seems to be (a stretch of the
>word) "optimal" in that it is efficient on the lower frequencies yet not
>too long so it maintains a decent angle of radiation on the higher
>frequencies. In reality - an insulated backstay is a pretty poor antenna
>when you look at the pattern as on most bands there are two pretty deep
>nulls about 120 degrees off the bow. Fortunately - they are fairly
>narrow. But you won't be able to achieve that length on a W32. A 23'
>whip as typically used on a power boat and most multi-hulls has an
>almost perfect omni pattern and a good launch angle - of course -
>assuming the boat is upright in the water - which is often NOT the case
>under way.
>
>IN short - no matter what you do - it is a compromise and you would have
>to work REALLY hard to screw it up so it wouldn't work as long as you
>follow good engineering practices. I have never seen an Icom tuner fail
>to load anything on any frequency - not the same can be said for the
>SGC230 (but that seems to be a different problem where it just won't
>tune sometimes without being reset) or certain SEA tuners (the 1635 will
>not load a 1/4 wave on 4.146 MHz - the check-in frequency for the PacCup
>race - go figure - and that is EXACTLY what they cut the backstay to on
>a Santa Cruz 52 - I received panic calls from three boats just before
>they were leaving on past Pacific Cups who had that tuner installed by
>someone because it - with the companion SEA235 radio - was light weight
>- didn't bother to check if it would work). SEA's other tuners (like the
>1631) do not appear to have this problem and like the SGC, will work
>with any radio.
>
>As far as grounding - there are many methods - but the only one I can
>say WILL work is bronze plates (drag is NOT an issue on a Westsail 32) -
>I recommend 2 of the 3" x 12" - and I have close to 500 installations
>now with no RFI problems running 150 watts using e-mail to back that up.
>
>I am not saying other methods WON'T work - just that it is difficult to
>predict the results and it can be a tremendous amount of work and
>expense with poor results. One thing that has been determined is SOME
>sort of direct sea-water contact is needed.
>
>Don Melcher
>W6CZ
>HF Radio On Board
>www.hfradio.com
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Elecraft mailing list
>Post to: [hidden email]
>You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
>Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft    Help:  http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
>Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
>
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft    Help:  http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com