Intentional QRM and operating practices.

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Intentional QRM and operating practices.

Edward A. Dauer
I too have been 99.5% CW for many years.  Two exceptions in this millennium were SSB skeds with Fred Cady, neither of which worked.

I know that anecdotes aren’t data, but I will share this one anyway.  Yesterday, having completed a K2 with the SSB option, I went on the air to see what people would say about the sound quality.  I didn’t know it until I got there, but this weekend is the CQWW SSB contest.  

When working CW and when my signal is weak at the station I am calling, the operator at the other end stays with it through as many repeats as it takes to complete the QSO.  I have often felt badly for everyone else in the pileup who is just waiting, silently, for their turn.  For that reason sometimes I decide to drop out and let someone else try.  That’s typical of CW in my experience.

The one near- SSB QSO I had yesterday, with a North American station, was very different.  After asking one repeat, having gotten half of my call right the first time, he just said “negative copy, QRZ de WZNXXX.”  I tossed the MH2 on the floor.

Well, the K2 will still work on CW even with the SSB option.

Ted, KN1CBR



   
   
   
   
    ------------------------------
   
    Message: 10
    Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 18:47:38 +0000
   
   
    I just avoid 20M.? Problem solved.? There's other bands which respond as
    well with fine gentlemen operators, 17M and 30M as examples.? If you've
    not tried 60M, it is a wonderful relief from the vocabulary found on 40M.
   
    73
   
    Bob, K4TAX
   
   
   
   
    Message: 13
    Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 15:09:39 -0400
    From: Dave Sublette <[hidden email]>
    To: [hidden email]
    Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Freq Onwership
    Message-ID: <[hidden email]>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
   
    The issue of who has priority on a given frequency was being debated 60 years ago when I first got on 75 meter AM.  It hasn?t changed.  It won?t change.  The language issue became a problem for me 20 years ago.  As a result I gave up phone and went to CW only, for the most part.  I also went to headphones because I couldn?t trust what might come out of the speaker when small children and my XYL were listening.  A very few obnoxious people ruin it for the vast majority.
   
    I haven?t missed phone.
   
    73,
   
    Dave, K4TO
    > On Oct 29, 2017, at 2:54 PM, Bob McGraw K4TAX <[hidden email]> wrote:
    >
    > I just avoid 20M.  Problem solved.  There's other bands which respond as well with fine gentlemen operators, 17M and 30M as examples.  If you've not tried 60M, it is a wonderful relief from the vocabulary found on 40M.
    > et/donate.html <http://www.qsl.net/donate.html>
    > Message delivered to [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>
   
   
    ------------------------------
   
 

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]