K1, calling CQ, 2x QRP QSO.

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
12 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

K1, calling CQ, 2x QRP QSO.

Darwin, Keith
I rarely call CQ - especially when running QRP.  But sometimes, a fella
has to do what a fella has to do.
 
Fired up the K1 on 20 meters, dialed up 14040 (or was it 14060 - can't
recall) and called CQ.  Got an answer from a station in NM which sure
made me smile (I love NM).  He was running an Argo 509 and we exchanged
449 sig reports.
 
Hmm, 5 watts to a vertical, call CQ and work a guy a couple thousand
miles away.  Sunspots, who needs sunspots when you have mojo :-)
 
- Keith KD1E -
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K1, calling CQ, 2x QRP QSO.

Sandy W5TVW
A lot of people nowadays don't understand HF propagation.  One MUST
remember that the propagation programs are not necessarily correct!

Many times bands are really open, but there isn't any activity.  A lot of
folks make a quick check, listen a minute or two and assume the band
is dead.  ALWAYS listen and ALWAYS call a few "CQ's".  You never know!

A classic example of this is assuming 10,12,15 meters are beyond help.
this part of the sunspot cycle.   Many times it will be dead for East-West paths
but open for North South paths, especially to South America from the USA.

This is the great advantage of "beacons" in various places on 20-10 meters.
Also weird anomalies will exist in propagation no computer program
will predict.

73,
Sandy W5TVW
----- Original Message -----
From: "Darwin, Keith" <[hidden email]>
To: "Elecraft Discussion List" <[hidden email]>
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 9:31 AM
Subject: [Elecraft] K1, calling CQ, 2x QRP QSO.


| I rarely call CQ - especially when running QRP.  But sometimes, a fella
| has to do what a fella has to do.
|  
| Fired up the K1 on 20 meters, dialed up 14040 (or was it 14060 - can't
| recall) and called CQ.  Got an answer from a station in NM which sure
| made me smile (I love NM).  He was running an Argo 509 and we exchanged
| 449 sig reports.
|  
| Hmm, 5 watts to a vertical, call CQ and work a guy a couple thousand
| miles away.  Sunspots, who needs sunspots when you have mojo :-)
|  
| - Keith KD1E -
| _______________________________________________
| Elecraft mailing list
| Post to: [hidden email]
| You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
| Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
|  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   
|
| Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
| Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
|
|
|
| --
| No virus found in this incoming message.
| Checked by AVG Free Edition.
| Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.24/244 - Release Date: 1/30/2006
|
|
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K1, calling CQ, 2x QRP QSO.

Jeff Davis-27
It is amazing how the bands marvelously "open up" during the really
big contest weekends, eh? :-)

On 1/30/06, Sandy W5TVW <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Many times bands are really open, but there isn't any activity.  A lot of
> folks make a quick check, listen a minute or two and assume the band
> is dead.  ALWAYS listen and ALWAYS call a few "CQ's".  You never know!

73 de Jeff, KE9V
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Off topic question

David-470
In reply to this post by Sandy W5TVW
A friend asked me yesterday if I knew why hams would be sending the
following

"Cq cq callsign callsign test test"

In cw over and over and over again I told him I did not, I could not
find anything on the internet about it so I thought I would ask the most
august body of hams for information. The signals where heard around
12:00 am midnight on 160m anyone know what was going on? Or why?

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Off topic question

Nigel A. Gunn G8IFF/KC8NHF
They're operating in a conTEST.

David wrote:

>A friend asked me yesterday if I knew why hams would be sending the
>following
>
>"Cq cq callsign callsign test test"
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Off topic question

Clark B. Wierda
In reply to this post by David-470
The "test test" suggests a contest CQ.  Probably from a automatic keyer or
a contest logging program.  Some contesters just letem rip until they hear
a response through the keying.

There was a 160M CW contest over the weekend, so that was probably from that.
--
Clark B. Wierda
N8CBW


> A friend asked me yesterday if I knew why hams would be sending the
> following
>
> "Cq cq callsign callsign test test"
>
> In cw over and over and over again I told him I did not, I could not
> find anything on the internet about it so I thought I would ask the most
> august body of hams for information. The signals where heard around
> 12:00 am midnight on 160m anyone know what was going on? Or why?
>


_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: K1, calling CQ, 2x QRP QSO.

Ron D'Eau Claire-2
In reply to this post by Sandy W5TVW
Sandy, W6TVW wrote:

A lot of people nowadays don't understand HF propagation.  One MUST
remember that the propagation programs are not necessarily correct!

------------------------------

Absolutely!! The predictions are like weather forecasting. Today we have a
100% chance of rain in Northwest Oregon based on the most advanced data
analysis in the world. We are told that we may be having the wettest January
since Lewis and Clark trekked through here in 1805.

Yet, outside my office window I see blue skies and the sun is shining!

Keith's "mojo" is his interest and willingness to listen and call on a
'dead' band, aided of course by a good rig! I commend you for that Keith. I
hope I can be on the other end of one of those QSO's one day. To me, your
choices are at the heart of Ham Radio as I most enjoy it.

Antenna modeling software, propagation analysis and all the rest are, at
best, a sort of "virtual reality". As compelling as the graphics may be,
they may not depict reality at all.

At least back in the days when analysis was done crunching numbers with our
only output huge arrays of digits on fan-fold paper we weren't seduced by
fancy graphics into believing that the results were anything more real than
a bunch of predictions based on a bunch of assumptions about what might be
true.

Ron AC7AC

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Off topic question

Earl W Cunningham
In reply to this post by David-470
"test" stands for "contest".   This past weekend was the annual CQ WW
160-meter contest.  Lots of fun!

73, de Earl, K6SE
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K1, calling CQ, 2x QRP QSO.

Tom Althoff
In reply to this post by Sandy W5TVW
When I was testing my KPA-100 to see how hot the heat sink would get during
contest level CQ'ing and didn't yet have my 300W dummy load  I set up the K2
with an automated CQ on the low end of 10M around 28.013.    I figured it
was a safe time of day on a dead band that wouldn't bother too many people
(and not bother me with having to stop my tests to have an actual QSO).

It was about 8AM ET and I had been testing for about an hour when a VP8 (who
also happened to be using a K2/100) answered one of my calls.

So the "dead" band came alive long enough to get me a new country on 10M at
the bottom of the solar cycle.

I hear people say that you need to listen more than CQ when you are QRP.
But believe me...there are a bunch of us people who's ear's perk up when we
hear a faint CQ in the noise.  The weak signal is the one that attracts my
attention although I have to admit to a slight letdown when a K1 with a K1
is not the VU7 I'd been hoping for.

Good luck and keep CQing!    Don't be afraid to get on at 3AM on 15M and
call CQ.   You just might find a kindred spirit who is not able to sleep
either and have a great QSO.

Tom K2TA

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sandy W5TVW" <[hidden email]>
To: "Darwin, Keith" <[hidden email]>; "Elecraft Discussion List"
<[hidden email]>
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 3:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K1, calling CQ, 2x QRP QSO.


> A lot of people nowadays don't understand HF propagation.  One MUST
> remember that the propagation programs are not necessarily correct!
>
> Many times bands are really open, but there isn't any activity.  A lot of
> folks make a quick check, listen a minute or two and assume the band
> is dead.  ALWAYS listen and ALWAYS call a few "CQ's".  You never know!
>
> A classic example of this is assuming 10,12,15 meters are beyond help.
> this part of the sunspot cycle.   Many times it will be dead for East-West
paths
> but open for North South paths, especially to South America from the USA.
>
> This is the great advantage of "beacons" in various places on 20-10
meters.

> Also weird anomalies will exist in propagation no computer program
> will predict.
>
> 73,
> Sandy W5TVW
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Darwin, Keith" <[hidden email]>
> To: "Elecraft Discussion List" <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 9:31 AM
> Subject: [Elecraft] K1, calling CQ, 2x QRP QSO.
>
>
> | I rarely call CQ - especially when running QRP.  But sometimes, a fella
> | has to do what a fella has to do.
> |
> | Fired up the K1 on 20 meters, dialed up 14040 (or was it 14060 - can't
> | recall) and called CQ.  Got an answer from a station in NM which sure
> | made me smile (I love NM).  He was running an Argo 509 and we exchanged
> | 449 sig reports.
> |
> | Hmm, 5 watts to a vertical, call CQ and work a guy a couple thousand
> | miles away.  Sunspots, who needs sunspots when you have mojo :-)
> |
> | - Keith KD1E -
> | _______________________________________________
> | Elecraft mailing list
> | Post to: [hidden email]
> | You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> | Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
> |  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> |
> | Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> | Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
> |
> |
> |
> | --
> | No virus found in this incoming message.
> | Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> | Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.24/244 - Release Date:
1/30/2006

> |
> |
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to: [hidden email]
> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
>  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K1, calling CQ, 2x QRP QSO.

Mike Harris-9
In reply to this post by Sandy W5TVW
G'day,

|A lot of people nowadays don't understand HF propagation.  One MUST
| remember that the propagation programs are not necessarily correct!

Maybe so but I find W6ELProp a very useful indicator of what could be
happening also Ham CAP/IonoProbe.

| Many times bands are really open, but there isn't any activity.  A lot
of
| folks make a quick check, listen a minute or two and assume the band
| is dead.  ALWAYS listen and ALWAYS call a few "CQ's".  You never know!

Too true.  I often listen 09:00 - 10:00 UTC on 30 metres and it's dead
until I put out a CQ, worked some interesting DX that way.

Regards,

Mike VP8NO

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K1, calling CQ, 2x QRP QSO.

Larry Makoski W2LJ
In reply to this post by Ron D'Eau Claire-2
Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:

>Sandy, W6TVW wrote:
>
>A lot of people nowadays don't understand HF propagation.  One MUST
>remember that the propagation programs are not necessarily correct!
>
>------------------------------
>
>Absolutely!! The predictions are like weather forecasting.
>

One must also remember that propagation "conventions" are not always
correct, either!

Take for instance the 80 Meter QRP-L Foxhunt a few weeks ago.  The two
foxes were in Virginia and Utah.  I am located in New Jersey.  Before
the hunt began, conventional wisdom and experience told me that I would
probably work the Virginia fox and probably wouldn't even hear the Utah fox.

In reality, the exact opposite came to be!  I guess when it comes to
propagation you should "expect the unexpected".


73 de Larry W2LJ

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: K1, calling CQ, 2x QRP QSO.

Ron D'Eau Claire-2
Larry, W2LJ wrote:

One must also remember that propagation "conventions" are not always
correct, either!

Take for instance the 80 Meter QRP-L Foxhunt a few weeks ago.  The two
foxes were in Virginia and Utah.  I am located in New Jersey.  Before
the hunt began, conventional wisdom and experience told me that I would
probably work the Virginia fox and probably wouldn't even hear the Utah fox.

In reality, the exact opposite came to be!  I guess when it comes to
propagation you should "expect the unexpected".

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Good point Larry!

After all, we Hams were given the "shortwaves" to play in because all the
experts with decades of on-air experience knew what we "couldn't get out of
our own backyards" on those frequencies.

It's significant to me that it was only a few of the Hams who did the work
to open the shortwaves, and then to prove that even "daylight DX" was
possible on the right frequencies.

The majority of the Hams stubbornly hung around the longest wavelengths they
could because they knew what the experts told them.

The moral of the story is that if you want to experience something exciting
and new, don't travel with the crowd.  

Ron AC7AC

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com