Thanks for all that have responded. I've installed a 100 K series resistor in the audio input as suggested. The problem continues, however. In messing around with the unit, I attached an EZhook cliplead to the audio input at the board-connector. The cliplead is attached to a wire about 1 ft long with another EZhook at the end. Nothing is attached to the other end, however. When this is done, the indicator works correctly, with no-signal responses to very few noise bursts and correct operation on signals, at full RF gain. The cliplead seems to be injecting noise into the audio line. If the other end is connected to a 1 M resistor to ground, the needless blinking resumes. This suggests that the K6XX board may be defective. Further ideas would be appreciated. Chris Kimball WB4WZR ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Chris,
If the K6XX tuning indicator is turning the LED on when you have a tone in the audio of the correct pitch, then it is working just fine and is not defective at all. Your challenge is to find the correct resistor to reduce the number of false detects. The indicator requires only about 20 millivolts at the AF input to trigger, and you have more audio at the hot end of the AF Gain control than that. If the simple series 100k resistor did not do it for you, then you will have to construct a voltage divider of 2 resistors. You might try a 47k from the hot side of the AF gain control to the input of the detector and then another from the input of the detector to ground. That will reduce the audio input to the detector to half that at the AF Gain control. Vary the two resistors, keeping the total resistance in the vicinity of 100 k to keep the resistors from loading down the normal AF signal in the K2. You might want to connect a 100k pot initially (the detector input connects to the wiper) so you can adjust it until you are satisfied with the detector sensitivity, then measure the resistance from the wiper to each end of the pot and substitute fixed resistors for the pot. 73, Don W3FPR On 7/1/2011 10:52 AM, Christopher Kimball wrote: > > Thanks for all that have responded. > > I've installed a 100 K series resistor in the audio input as suggested. > The problem continues, however. > > In messing around with the unit, I attached an EZhook cliplead to the > audio input at the board-connector. The cliplead is attached to a wire > about 1 ft long with another EZhook at the end. Nothing is attached to > the other end, however. When this is done, the indicator works > correctly, with no-signal responses to very few noise bursts and correct > operation on signals, at full RF gain. > > The cliplead seems to be injecting noise into the audio line. If the > other end is connected to a 1 M resistor to ground, the needless > blinking resumes. > > This suggests that the K6XX board may be defective. Further ideas would > be appreciated. > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
On 07/01/11 09:00, Don Wilhelm wrote:
> You might want to connect a 100k pot initially (the detector input > connects to the wiper) so you can adjust it until you are satisfied with > the detector sensitivity, then measure the resistance from the wiper to > each end of the pot and substitute fixed resistors for the pot. Don, Are there any drawbacks to leaving the pot or trim-pot in the circuit permanently? 73, Wayne Conrad KF7QGA ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Wayne,
No drawbacks as long as it is of a size the physically fits somewhere between the front panel and the control board. 73, Don W3FPR On 7/1/2011 12:23 PM, Wayne Conrad wrote: > On 07/01/11 09:00, Don Wilhelm wrote: >> You might want to connect a 100k pot initially (the detector input >> connects to the wiper) so you can adjust it until you are satisfied with >> the detector sensitivity, then measure the resistance from the wiper to >> each end of the pot and substitute fixed resistors for the pot. > Don, > > Are there any drawbacks to leaving the pot or trim-pot in the circuit > permanently? > > 73, Wayne Conrad KF7QGA > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |