|
Do K2/100's have a known transmitted phase noise issue? I looked at the reflector archives, and there was some comment by K6SE (SK) in 2005 that seemed to indicate there was, but the scenario seemed rather specific.
Last year as C6ATA I ran in-band SO2R on 40m using a K2/100 (s/n 2773) and a TS-850. Both were low power. The antennas were verticals on the beach, and a dipole about 400' away. When transmitting on the TS-850, I could listen to the weakest of stations on the K2 within 2 kc of the TS-850's freq. Though when transmitting on the K2, there was wide-band noise on the TS-850, covering up a layer or two of signals. It didnt matter which rig was using which antenna, the results were the same. I tend to think this was a TX phase noise issue, and not a more robust RX in the K2.
Can anyone shed some light? If this is an issue, is there any resolve?
Many thanks, Kenny K2KW
_______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
|
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 10:52:35 -0400, Kenneth Silverman wrote:
>Do K2/100's have a known transmitted phase noise issue? YES! When I moved from Chicago to Santa Cruz, I was using it as my primary CW contesting rig, driving a Ten Tec Titan amp. K6XX and W0YK lost no time informing me that I was broad. Switched to the TS850 and they were happy. I later learned that W0YK switched away from a K2/100 for the same reason. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
|
In reply to this post by Kenneth Silverman
Yes and no. The transmitted phase noise on the K2/100
is well within FCC regs. However, when driving a 1.5 KW linear in close
proximity (few miles line-of-sight) to other contesters, it was bothersome for
weak signal reception. That was the primary reason I abandoned the K2/100
for SO2R and contesting (at home) in general. As you know, it has an
excellent receiver and handles DX and contest expedition pile-ups
excellently. It just isn't friendly with other close-by receivers when
running > QRP. It should be fine if you do another QRP contest
expedition. ;>)
73,
Ed - W0YK
_______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
|
In reply to this post by Kenneth Silverman
I used a pair of K2/100's as a SO2R pair for 5 years. I never felt that TX phase noise was a limitation for me. I could listen quite well on other bands except near the harmonics of the transmitter. This is at either 100W or 1500W level. I have ICE bandpass filters and stubs and most of my antennas have reasonable isolation. Tor N4OGW |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
