I can understand that and I would agree. I had a Ten Tec Argonaut V.
Compared to the K2, it sounded, for lack of a better description...thick and
muddy. I like the crystal filters much better than the DSP that was on the
Argonaut V and the K2 is much quieter than a couple of other rigs that I have.
This past weekend, I was able to hear a Norway station that was barely out of
the noise level on CW. I doubt that I could have heard it on the Century 22
or the Kenwood TS-530SP.
Gary, N7HTS
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 07:46:02 -0700 (PDT)
Lee Buller <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>
> I worked the 3B7C station last night on 40 meters with a dipole. I compare
>the signals between the PROII and the K2/100. Same! But, I think the K2 was
>easier on the ears...cleaner audio or something. Reminds me the the ICOM 765
>which is the sweetest sounding radio I've ever used in my opinion.
>
> But....the signals were still the same....but sweeter on the K2 thant the
>PRO-2
>
> Lee - K0WA
>
>
>
> In our day and age it seems that Common Sense is in short supply. If you
>don't have any Common Sense - get some Common Sense and use it. If you can't
>find any Common Sense, ask for help from somebody who has some Common Sense.
> Is Common Sense divine?
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to:
[hidden email]
> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
>
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>
> Help:
http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm> Elecraft web page:
http://www.elecraft.com_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to:
[hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help:
http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htmElecraft web page:
http://www.elecraft.com
Locked
