Elecraft

K2 purchase considered

Classic

List

Threaded

23 messages Options

Phil Kane-2

Re: K2 purchase considered

On 11/20/2020 7:16 PM, Jim Brown wrote:

> No question, Robert. But the original post gave me the impression he was
> expecting to use a local builder, which is why I responded as I did.

Because of my limited eyesight (macular edema with retinal scarring
resulting in blurry monocular close-up eyesight) I was fortunate to have
a local builder (now moved away) assemble my K2 with all the bells and
whistles 15 years ago. Even though I can't use it much for the last 8
years (antenna restrictions) I still love it.

73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane
Elecraft K2/100 s/n 5402

From a Clearing in the Silicon Forest
Beaverton (Washington County) Oregon

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]

barry halterman

Re: K2 purchase considered

In reply to this post by Dave Van Wallaghen-2

Thank you Dave for the explanation on the reflector. I know there are a lot
of K2 fans on here and I don't want to discourage anyone from a K2, nor do
I want to say the K2 is not a fantastic radio. It is, except when tuning
around strong signals.
Barry

On Sat, Nov 21, 2020, 1:51 PM Dave Van Wallaghen <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Fellow listers,
>
> I'd like to add some clarity to the audio chirp problem mentioned by
> Barry. As some of you may or may not know, I took over for Don Wilhelm,
> W3FPR when he retired in February of 2019. I am a third party service
> provider through my company W8FGU Services, LLC as well as an employee
> of Elecraft providing support and servicing of their Classic Line of
> products.
>
> Barry contacted me a few months ago to report the chirping (popping)
> problem and sent me his K2 for service. I spent a good amount of hours
> researching this problem where I was able to reproduce what Barry was
> hearing. It was through his wonderful description of how to produce the
> problem that I was able to reproduce the same issue on a number of K2's
> I have here in the shop including my own personal K2 #5099.
>
> With that said, I must emphasize that the great majority of K2 users
> will not be affected by this issue. There have been reports of chirps or
> pops during tuning in the past. Most were resolved by running CAL PLL
> again and making sure that the bottom cover was installed on the unit
> after plenty of warm up time. This is still the first line of defense
> when dealing with this problem. Unfortunately for Barry, this did not
> solve the issue he was hearing. And while I can explain why the issue
> occurs, I can't really explain why it is worse for some units than
> others except to say that the K2 was designed to use readily available
> through-hole parts with 5% and 10% tolerances and that it's possible
> those tolerances add up in certain circumstances. And, it must be
> remembered that the K2 is a 22 year old design. The fact that this
> design still produces a rig with the performance numbers it has after 22
> years and is still available as a build-able kit is a great tribute to
> Wayne and Eric's vision and implementation.
>
> The issue: audio chirps and pops were being heard while tuning only when
> there were strong signals on the band within +/- 50KHz of the VFO
> frequency being tuned. These chirps were being heard every 5KHz of
> tuning. This happens to be the tuning boundary of the K2 PLL Oscillator.
> In a nutshell, at the 5KHz boundary, the PLL chip was programmed with
> new divide by registers and then the PLL Oscillator was moved to the min
> or max end of its range depending on the direction of tuning. Between
> these two operations was a brief period (a few milliseconds) where there
> was some instability while the closed loop of the PLL circuit settled
> down after the change in boundary. This produced a large voltage spike
> from the output of the PLL chip that caused the integrator circuit
> feeding the VCO varactors to sweep the VCO 50KHz or so in a few
> milliseconds. If there was a large signal in that frequency range, it
> was heard as a chirp or pop. It would be like spinning the VFO knob
> 50KHz in 8 milliseconds. This is why these chirps are not heard when
> there are no signals on the band in the area of tuning.
>
> As I was able to reproduce this issue, I believe in the past, I just
> simply blew off what I heard as atmospheric noise while I was tuning,
> especially on noisier bands like 40m. Barry could really hear it on 20m
> where there was less atmospheric noise but large signals on the band.
> This is especially exacerbated when tuning through the lower part of 20m
> during a contest where strong CW and digital mode signals made this very
> noticeable. Again, most users will not notice this especially if tuning
> slowly through the band. When using a tuning rate of 100Hz or 1KHz, it
> may be more noticeable as you are hitting the 5KHz PLL Osc boundary
> quicker.
>
> As I explained to Barry, I would never have noticed this before he
> explained how to produce it. Now that I know what it is, it drives me
> crazy. And I am not describing this to bring it to light for all of you
> (although I know many of you will try to reproduce it now - sorry). As
> Wayne explained to me, this type of PLL tuning design was fairly popular
> (and cutting edge) at the time and many radios of the time might produce
> similar results.
>
> What I came up with for Barry was a simple one-shot circuit that would
> punch the AGC line of the IF Amp during the 5KHz tuning boundary to
> dampen the volume for about 15ms to prevent the audio chirp. It monitors
> the chip select line of the PLL chip which happens when the process of
> setting the divide by registers is going to occur at the beginning of
> the PLL boundary reset. The pulse dampens the IF Amp long enough to
> allow completion of the boundary reset and prevent any strong signals to
> be heard that may be in the VCO sweep that follows.
>
> Again, the vast majority of users will not notice this issue, and as I
> mentioned, it may be at different intensities on a per unit basis. I am
> trying to develop a very small SMD version of this one-shot circuit for
> Barry to test out. This is not a documented mod as yet and has not been
> approved by Wayne and Eric in any manner except for experimental
> purposes. I just wanted to explain where things are at before this
> conversation became speculative or confrontational.
>
> I will be happy to answer any questions that may come up.
>
> 73,
> Dave W8FGU
>
> ------ Original Message ------
> From: "Macy monkeys" <[hidden email]>
> To: [hidden email]
> Sent: 11/21/2020 9:53:35 AM
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2 purchase considered
>
> >
> >Me neither. #586.
> >
> >John K7FD
> >
> >> On Nov 20, 2020, at 10:13 PM, Vic Rosenthal <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Strange. I have K2 #725, which received various mods over the years,
> but I never noticed anything like a loud pop, nor do I recall a mod for it.
> >>
> >> Victor 4X6GP
> >>
> >>> On 21 Nov 2020, at 4:41, barry halterman <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I will throw my two cents in on this. Quite frankly, I do not see
> how a K2
> >>> got the reviews it did over the years. I put one together in July to
> do
> >>> something during lock down. After assembly, which was really a
> pleasure,
> >>> and in two or three weeks after, I noticed a disturbing pop when
> tuning
> >>> around strong cw stations. The s meter would jump to maximum signal
> >>> strength and my ears took a beating with the loud pop!
> >>> The rig went back to Elecraft for evaluation and I was told with this
> type
> >>> of PLL circuit design, this is the nature of the beast. Having known
> this
> >>> irritating pop is nature of the beast, I would have saved my money!!
> >>> I want to say that Elecraft made a modification to help with the
> strong
> >>> pops and I am very thankful for that and the the terrific service,
> but the
> >>> pops are a big annoyance to me even with the suppressor.
> >>> I still am evaluating if I want to keep this thing or put it up for
> sale.
> >>> K3bo
> >>>
> >>>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020, 9:11 PM Macy monkeys <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Agree. I have had a parade of 'better' rigs come and go through the
> >>>> shack...but my K2 built over 20 years ago is still here.
> >>>>
> >>>> John K7FD
> >>>>
> >>>>>> On Nov 20, 2020, at 5:41 PM, Robert G Strickland via Elecraft <
> >>>>>[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> John...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jim has the resume to back up his opinion(s) which I do not have.
> His
> >>>> view point always merits serious consideration. For myself, building
> the K2
> >>>> was/is one of the "peak experiences" I have enjoyed as an amateur
> radio
> >>>> operator. While I now use a K3s - and it is a "better" radio - I have
> >>>> continued to use the K2 regularly over the years. I never fail to
> smile
> >>>> when it powers up, and the two of us go on the radio journey of the
> moment.
> >>>> It is my go-to radio for field day. When I bought it there were no
> other
> >>>> options, while today, the KX2/3, K3/s, K4 are all excellent radios
> that
> >>>> should be considered; you can't go wrong with any of them. That said
> and
> >>>> speaking for myself, I would sell any of the "better" radios in my
> >>>> possession before parting with my K2. When you go on to better and
> better
> >>>> rigs, you'll never regret the time spent with the K2. This reads
> like a
> >>>> "testimonial," and I suppose that it is. No offense to anyone meant.
> Just
> >>>> one ham's opinion.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ...robert
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 11/20/2020 06:54 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 11/20/2020 10:07 AM, John Daws wrote:
> >>>>>>> Am really tempted to get a K2 to use alongside the above- I have
> an
> >>>>>>> experienced builder here in the UK.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Everything I have read about the K2 excites me!!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Most of the fun of the K2 is in the building. The newer rigs (K3,
> K3S,
> >>>>>> KX3, K4) are better radios.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 73, Jim K9YC
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ______________________________________________________________
> >>>>>> Elecraft mailing list
> >>>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> >>>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> >>>>>> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> >>>>>> Please help support this email list:
> http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> >>>>>> Message delivered to [hidden email]
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Robert G Strickland, PhD ABPH - KE2WY
> >>>>>[hidden email]
> >>>>> Syracuse, New York, USA
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ______________________________________________________________
> >>>>> Elecraft mailing list
> >>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> >>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> >>>>> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> >>>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> >>>>> Message delivered to [hidden email]
> >>>>
> >>>> ______________________________________________________________
> >>>> Elecraft mailing list
> >>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> >>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> >>>> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
> >>>>
> >>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> >>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> >>>> Message delivered to [hidden email]
> >>> ______________________________________________________________
> >>> Elecraft mailing list
> >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> >>> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
> >>>
> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> >>> Message delivered to [hidden email]
> >
> >______________________________________________________________
> >Elecraft mailing list
> >Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> >Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> >Post: mailto:[hidden email]
> >
> >This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> >Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> >Message delivered to [hidden email]
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to [hidden email]

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]

john daws

Re: K2 purchase considered

In reply to this post by Ed Pflueger

Thanks for the tip!

best wishes Ed

john

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 7:54 PM Ed Pflueger <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I think Dave W8FGU might have some Fixed Audio Out and PTT Kits for Sale.
>
> Ed.. AB4IQ
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [hidden email]
> [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Don Wilhelm
> Sent: Friday, November 20, 2020 12:40 PM
> To: John Daws <[hidden email]>; [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2 purchase considered
>
> John,
>
> The K2/10 does not have a KEYOUT signal, so you would have to add one to
> key
> the KXPA100 (it is not a kit available from Elecraft). You can see what
> needs to be added at http://www.mmccs.com/mmarc/n0ss/index_k2.html
> - scroll down to K2 (basic) External T-R Relay Driver. Contrary to what is
> stated, no kits are available - N0SS is SK.
>
> Other than that, the K2 is still a good transceiver even though it is a
> 22 year old design.
>
> 73,
> Don W3FPR
>
>
> On 11/20/2020 1:07 PM, John Daws wrote:
> > Advice and opinions sought please
> >
> >
> >
> > Am a CW only operator with retro tendencies! I enjoy QRP but also the
> > flexibility to QRO to 50 watts (maximum allowed for the intermediate
> > licence)
> >
> >
> >
> > Have used a KX3 since 2016 and added a KXPA 100 +ATU last year
> >
> >
> >
> > Am really tempted to get a K2 to use alongside the above- I have an
> > experienced builder here in the UK.
> >
> >
> >
> > Everything I have read about the K2 excites me!!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > If I order the basic K2+ KNB2+KAF2 I can presumably use this
> > combination with the KXPA100+ATU which I already have?
> >
> >
> >
> > Is there any other combination or extra I should look at as a
> > literally CW only operator??
> >
> >
> >
> > I do not need KSB2 or the K160m options.
> >
> >
> >
> > (Would buy second hand if I could find a good one but would need to
> > know a lot about the provenance of the builder)
> >
> >
> >
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message
> delivered to [hidden email]
>
>