K3/100 antenna connector(s)

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

K3/100 antenna connector(s)

JACrux
It would be nice to see N connectors in a radio of this class. If BNC is fine
for the basic K2, why go to SO239 instead of an N socket for the 100w
version ? OK everyone has them, but PL259s are a pain to install.
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K3/100 antenna connector(s)

Don Wilhelm-3
Not all will agree - I know many hams who will use nothing other than
UHF connectors, and I have heard many others comment that BNC's *must*
be changed to SO239 jacks.

While I believe you are correct, I think it would alienate many buyers
to have type N connectors.  Besides, UHF connectors are good up through
6 meters, and at times even through 2 meters.

When the rest of the world learns that N connectors are easier to
install than PL259s, things may change, but for now, much of the ham
world believes that PL259s are easier.

73,
Don W3FPR

JACrux wrote:
> It would be nice to see N connectors in a radio of this class. If BNC is fine
> for the basic K2, why go to SO239 instead of an N socket for the 100w
> version ? OK everyone has them, but PL259s are a pain to install.
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: K3/100 antenna connector(s)

Evert Bakker (PA2KW)
In reply to this post by JACrux
I would prefer the BNC. Quick, good and easy.
What else do you want?

Evert PA2KW

-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email]
[mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of JACrux
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 22:16
To: [hidden email]
Subject: [Elecraft] K3/100 antenna connector(s)

It would be nice to see N connectors in a radio of this class. If BNC is
fine
for the basic K2, why go to SO239 instead of an N socket for the 100w
version ? OK everyone has them, but PL259s are a pain to install.
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com