Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 posts
|
Hi List
I am wondering how to correct the power output on 6 meters. The K3 claims 120 watts and the Bird wattmeter into a 50 ohm load shows 90 watts. Also with the Bird showing 50 watts, the K3 shows 68 watts. Any suggestions? Bob NQ3N ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8557 posts
|
Bob,
Do the math for the percentage accuracy for each wattmeter and I think you will have a reasonable explanation. Then you can decide which one that you would rather believe. The accuracy percentage for any instrument is an important parameter, and understanding the conditions under which the instrument is specified for will tell you how much you can trust whatever its indication may be. In general, wattmeters are woefully inaccurate unless you have precision instruments, and the Bird 43 wattmeter, while well regarded, is not as accurate as many hams give it credit. A newly calibrated Bird 43 wattmeter is supposed to have a potential error of 5% of full scale - note that the slug must conform to the frequency range you are trying to measure. So if you are using a 250 watt slug, the error can be as much as 12.5 watts on either side of the indicated power - at 100 watts indicated by the Bird, the actual power could be anywhere between 87.5 watts and 112.5 watts. If the Bird and slug have not been recently calibrated, allow more like 10% for the possible error unless you have made reliable measurements to justify otherwise. The K3 wattmeter can be calibrated following the instructions in the manual, and if the calibration has not been done, it could be off by as much as 15%. Note that the percentages for the K3 are my estimates based on my own experience and judgement - I have no information from Aptos on this matter other than what is in the K3 specification - the K3 wattmeter is not specified. If you have previously calibrated your K3 wattmeter, the potential error will be as large as the potential error of the instrument you used for calibration plus some additional percentage for a reading error of the instrument used, plus a small percentage (up to 5%) for differences in the K3 detector at different frequencies. If you have a factory built K3, the wattmeter was calibrated at the factory and you can assume a 5% error at the actual indicated power - if the K3 indicates 100 watts, the actual power can be between 95 and 105 watts. Ron Eau Claire had a good explanation of wattmeter accuracy on this reflector yesterday under the subject line of "K3 Watt-meter question!" 73, Don W3FPR Robert P. Ward wrote: > Hi List > > > > I am wondering how to correct the power output on 6 meters. > > The K3 claims 120 watts and the Bird wattmeter into a 50 ohm load > > shows 90 watts. Also with the Bird showing 50 watts, the K3 shows > > 68 watts. Any suggestions? > > > > Bob NQ3N > > ... [show rest of quote] ______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |