This was supposed to go to the reflector, sorry Joe.
I think top-post is the reflector standard, see below. I apologize, I don't know who wrote what Joe quotes ... I'm not sure I understand usage of the term "clipping" that has crept into the "where's the punch" thread. From my limited FM/AM/TV broadcast experience nearly a lifetime ago while a college student, clipping and compression, at least then, were two very separate things. Clipping referred to a [generally] unity gain stage which at some output amplitude saturated heavily. Thus, up to that point it was linear -- what went in came out. At saturation, there was no increase in output amplitude regardless of input amplitude increase. On the scope, the peaks just became flat. Our TV Stab Amps [KSBY-TV] had a clipping stage to flatten the line-sync prior to the keyed clamp stage which clamped the sync tips to a fixed level and removed the DC drift as the video changed. Compression was a variable gain amplifier. At very low input level, the gain had some value which slowly decreased [usually linearly, sometimes exponentially] as the input increased. The net effect was to decrease the higher amplitudes in favor of the lower amplitudes, thus reducing the dynamic range of the audio signal and raising the mean power. I recall they came in several forms based on the time constant. The audio chain on our AM transmitter [KVEC] included both a fast T-C and a very long T-C [Sta-Level?] such that the dynamic range was very small and everything was close to 100% modulation. I could be wrong, it's happened a few times in the past, but I don't think my K3 has a clipping stage, I think it is a classic variable-gain compression stage which linearly reduces the dynamic range of the modulating audio with increasing amplitude, with the first derivative of the amplifier gain vs amplitude being adjusted by the CMP knob. Feel free to correct me, as I said, it was nearly a lifetime ago, and this really is a poorly worded question. Off the reflector might be a good idea. 73, Fred K6DGW -- K3 #642 -- K2 # 4398 -- KX1 # 897 On 10/5/2010 12:43 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote: > > > Now you have K3 users with no clue about how to set the TX eq and > > clipping level OPTIONS to get the IDENTICAL shape to their voices on a > > K3 as the other rigs. There actually is a clarity advantage to the > > K3's clipping method IF you know where to set all the options. > > How very true ... ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Fred, > From my limited FM/AM/TV broadcast experience nearly a lifetime ago > while a college student, clipping and compression, at least then, were > two very separate things. I am very aware of the difference between clipping and compression. I spent the majority of 20 years as a Director of Engineering in the TV broadcast field and before that my early training was in recording studios and radio production. I used clipping intentionally in my posting. But if you don't believe me, please refer to the information (test results) posted by Jack Smith, W8ZOA on his web site <http://cliftonlaboratories.com/elecraft_k3_speech_processing.htm> in which he characterized operation of the K3's audio processing. Jack's analysis is: "This plot should immediately suggest that normal audio compression is not used by the K3. The input-output curve slope does not appreciably change with input signal for compression settings between 0 and 30, and for compression settings of 35 and 40, extreme slope changes are present." Jack further reports information from Lyle Johnson, KK7P: "Lyle Johnson, KK7P, of Elecraft confirmed in response to my question, that the K3 implements RF clipping, not audio compression. Accordingly, the input-output transfer function does not appreciably change slope for different compression setting values." Thus, while the K3 Owner's Manual may refer to the audio processing as "compression," in truth the DSP algorithm is really an envelope (RF) clipper and the K3 behaves that way. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 10/5/2010 6:31 PM, Fred Jensen wrote: > This was supposed to go to the reflector, sorry Joe. > > I think top-post is the reflector standard, see below. I apologize, I > don't know who wrote what Joe quotes ... > > I'm not sure I understand usage of the term "clipping" that has crept > into the "where's the punch" thread. > > From my limited FM/AM/TV broadcast experience nearly a lifetime ago > while a college student, clipping and compression, at least then, were > two very separate things. Clipping referred to a [generally] unity gain > stage which at some output amplitude saturated heavily. Thus, up to > that point it was linear -- what went in came out. At saturation, there > was no increase in output amplitude regardless of input amplitude > increase. On the scope, the peaks just became flat. Our TV Stab Amps > [KSBY-TV] had a clipping stage to flatten the line-sync prior to the > keyed clamp stage which clamped the sync tips to a fixed level and > removed the DC drift as the video changed. > > Compression was a variable gain amplifier. At very low input level, the > gain had some value which slowly decreased [usually linearly, sometimes > exponentially] as the input increased. The net effect was to decrease > the higher amplitudes in favor of the lower amplitudes, thus reducing > the dynamic range of the audio signal and raising the mean power. I > recall they came in several forms based on the time constant. The audio > chain on our AM transmitter [KVEC] included both a fast T-C and a very > long T-C [Sta-Level?] such that the dynamic range was very small and > everything was close to 100% modulation. > > I could be wrong, it's happened a few times in the past, but I don't > think my K3 has a clipping stage, I think it is a classic variable-gain > compression stage which linearly reduces the dynamic range of the > modulating audio with increasing amplitude, with the first derivative of > the amplifier gain vs amplitude being adjusted by the CMP knob. > > Feel free to correct me, as I said, it was nearly a lifetime ago, and > this really is a poorly worded question. Off the reflector might be a > good idea. > > 73, > > Fred K6DGW > -- K3 #642 > -- K2 # 4398 > -- KX1 # 897 > > On 10/5/2010 12:43 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote: > > > > > Now you have K3 users with no clue about how to set the TX eq and > > > clipping level OPTIONS to get the IDENTICAL shape to their > voices on a > > > K3 as the other rigs. There actually is a clarity advantage to the > > > K3's clipping method IF you know where to set all the options. > > > > How very true ... > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |