|
Many users have commented on microphones used with varying
results on the K3. I thought I might share my experiences with different mics. I have used the following: A Kenwood MC-60, a Shure Unidyne 55S, a Behringer B1 and a headset/boom mic combination designed for PC use. The Kenwood and Shure mics are both priced at over 100-dollars. The Behringer can be had for 99 dollars. In the case of the 55S and B1, they were connected to the Line input via a Behringer UB802 mixer. This unit, or one like it, is required for the B1 in order to supply the 48 volt phantom voltage that this mic needs. Anyone wanting to try a B1, or any professional grade microphone that requires a phantom supply, can purchase (or build) a stand-alone supply designed for use without a mixer or, for use with a mixer that is not so equipped. All of the above mentioned microphones worked fine with the K3. But, the one mic that gave the best results was... you guessed it... the PC headset/boom mic! This is a "no-name" brand item that can be had for under 20-dollars. Mine set me back about 12 bucks. I have continued to test this particular microphone against the others in on-air tests. It is amazing to me that this is the mic chosen by stations on "the far end" as the one that sounds best. And those reports are great with comments like "excellent", "natural" and "super clean". Everyone's voice is unique... some mics are better suited to one individual versus another. So, your mileage may vary... but I am convinced that, in the case of a good, or great, sounding microphone for the K3, one cannot claim that you "get what you pay for!" I guess what I am saying is... don't be discouraged if your audio reports aren't quite what you expected... Thinking that spending a lot of money on a microphone will "fix it", might not be a wise decision. Try some of those inexpensive electret condenser mics first. I love the look of the Unidyne, and I am actually thinking of opening up the shell and using some super-glue to tack a 4-dollar electret element in there. Hey! Who's gonna know !! 73, Joe - W1AIU K3/100 #269 _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
|
Yeah, Joe, I didn't think my voice deserved a two hundred dollar
microphone. I'm using a Motorola hand mic from the land mobile world because I had it in stock. It has an electret element with a transistor amplifier circuit. I simply cut off the Motorola connector and put on one for the K3. I also strapped the PTT switch contacts that switch the mic circuit to avoid the possibility of a big bump when keying up. Does it have flat response out to 20 kc? Doubt it. Good strong lows so I'll sound beautiful? Not on a communications mic. Does it have a nice rising response to give the right brilliance for pile ups, or for casual use? Don't know. But it sounds fine with the K3's equalizer set flat straight across. I'd say keep it simple. Works for a simple guy like me. Dave W5DHM K3 #605 > ... > I guess what I am saying is... don't be discouraged if your audio > reports aren't quite what you expected... Thinking that spending > a lot of money on a microphone will "fix it", might not be a wise > decision. Try some of those inexpensive electret condenser mics first. > I love the look of the Unidyne, and I am actually thinking of opening up > the shell and using some super-glue to tack a 4-dollar electret element > in there. Hey! Who's gonna know !! > > 73, > Joe - W1AIU > K3/100 #269 Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
