Just my (unsolicted) two-cents comment:
I find using below 2.1 KHz (with the DSP filter) distorts SSB too
much for me. I have only the 2.8 and 0.400 KHz filters at this
time. If I were to buy another it would be 2.1. Folks should factor
in that I am 67 and have extreme hearing loss so your experience my
vary (I have to use captioning on TV). (hint) Before purchasing a
roofing filter check out using the DSP filter to decide which bw is
best for you.
I am only a casual user of HF so intense high-density contesting or
DXing is not my forte. Operating a little in FD gives me enough of a
taste and the K3 is a real "joy" to use under tough
conditions. Mostly, I am copying extreme-weak signals (VHF+) where
narrowing bw makes the difference (typ 2.1 for SSB and 100-200 Hz for
CW). But I start at 2.8-KHz when searching for weak CW, then switch
to 400-Hz filter and use the DSP filter to improve readability
(signals below noise) once I found a signal.
------------------------------
Message: 43
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 10:27:05 -0500
From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <
[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 Filter question - SSB
To:
[hidden email]
Message-ID: <
[hidden email]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
I would not go any tighter than 1.8 KHz. I have a pair of the 1.5 KHz
filters that I would swap for 1.8s.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
73, Ed - KL7UW, WD2XSH/45
======================================
BP40IQ 500 KHz - 10-GHz www.kl7uw.com
EME: 50-1.1kw?, 144-1.4kw, 432-QRT, 1296-?, 3400-?
DUBUS Magazine USA Rep
[hidden email]
======================================
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraftHelp:
http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htmPost: mailto:
[hidden email]
This list hosted by:
http://www.qsl.netPlease help support this email list:
http://www.qsl.net/donate.html