K3 I think not!

[Gregg R. Lengling]

With all the recurring talk of the possibilty of a K3....I think some
history is missing.  First we had the K2, then the K1, then the KX1...which
leads me to believe the next product would be a K 0.5 (or 1/2) or a
K?1....right???
Gregg R. Lengling, W9DHI, Retired
K2/100 SN 3075
http://www.milwaukeehdtv.org
http://forums.ham-radio.ch/ 

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

[Mike Markowski]

You could be right, Gregg, but remember: 2 + 1 + 1/2 + 1/4 + ... = 4.
So the ultimate rig (given infinite time & rigs) must be a -K4-.  :-P

Mike ab3ap

Gregg R. Lengling wrote:
> With all the recurring talk of the possibilty of a K3....I think some
> history is missing.  First we had the K2, then the K1, then the
> KX1...which leads me to believe the next product would be a K 0.5 (or
> 1/2) or a K?1....right???
> Gregg R. Lengling, W9DHI, Retired
> K2/100 SN 3075
> http://www.milwaukeehdtv.org
> http://forums.ham-radio.ch/
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com