Amazing stuff. Must be my ears but I have not found a case where the NR did
not work as expected.
Compared to an Icom I had here the only way I found it worked great was
when in attenuated the weak signals so much they were not heard of again.
But then again, nobody answered my calls either so I switched it off.
guess I am either blessed or dumb enough to have found the sweet spot...:-)
YMMV of course...that's a given.
On 4 September 2013 08:40, <
[hidden email]> wrote:
> I agree with the posts that would like the K3 NR to be improved. I've
> used 3 different K3's at several different QTH's, using all of the
> available
> settings, and the NR seldom helped. That said, I've found the NR on some
> other radios to work very well, so it can be done.
>
> 73,
> Dick- K9OM
>
>
>
>
> In a message dated 9/3/2013 5:23:53 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
>
[hidden email] writes:
>
> >I have to say that I agree with you Allen. If there's one thing I'm very
> disappointed with, it's the noise reduction system in general. In my
> experience the noise reduction, notch and AFP functions are not of any use
> to me
> as a CW op. On the other hand, the narrow filter is amazing.
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home:
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft> Help:
http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm> Post: mailto:
[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by:
http://www.qsl.net> Please help support this email list:
http://www.qsl.net/donate.html>
--
*Gary - VK1ZZ
Skype: Gary.VK1ZZ
http://www.qsl.net/vk1zzMotorhome Portable*
*"Grumpy's House"*
*Elecraft K3
KPA500FT
KAT500FT**
*
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraftHelp:
http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htmPost: mailto:
[hidden email]
This list hosted by:
http://www.qsl.netPlease help support this email list:
http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Locked
