|
Vic,
Thanks. There is no "tone" that I would associate with what I am hearing. It is more a burst of noise, but transient in nature. Jim W6AIM . -----Original Message----- From: Elecraft [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Vic Rosenthal 4X6GP/K2VCO Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 11:41 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 Popping noise in headphones?? Well, I have an old K3 plus new synths, I have the RX EQ set to zero dB all across its range, and I hear the noises. I would call them short tone bursts rather than pops, though. 73, Vic, 4X6GP/K2VCO Rehovot, Israel http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/ On 18 Oct 2015 21:16, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote: > > On 10/18/2015 11:46 AM, Wes (N7WS) wrote: >> As a point of reference, my old K3 with the original synthesizer >> board pops when changing BW. It's most noticeable going from 150 Hz >> to 100 Hz and vice versa. > > There will be a slight pop when changing bandwidth between 150 and 100 > Hz as the K3/K3S disables the RXEQ at bandwidths less than 150 Hz. > The level of the "pop" will be related to the amount of EQ in use > *around* *the center of the passband* (e.g., "pitch"). If for > example, pitch is > 500 Hz and bands 4 (400 Hz) and 5 (800 Hz) are 0, there will be little > or no "pop". However, if one has 400/800 Hz set for significant boost > there will be a fairly loud "pop" as the level changes. > > 73, > > ... Joe, W4TV > > > On 10/18/2015 11:46 AM, Wes (N7WS) wrote: >> As a point of reference, my old K3 with the original synthesizer >> board pops when changing BW. It's most noticeable going from 150 Hz >> to 100 Hz and vice versa. >> This is with normal AF gain and CM500 in rear headphone jack. >> >> On 10/16/2015 6:01 PM, jim wrote: >>> I just got my K3 back from Elecraft. They did the once over and >>> installed the new SYN boards. >>> >>> >>> I have noticed a "popping" noise in the headphones as I change the >>> bandwidth control, but ONLY as I transition from 200 Hz, 150 Hz, 100 >>> Hz and 50 Hz. I have only checked this in the CW mode. >>> >>> >>> This popping noise was not there before sending the rig in. >>> >>> >>> I have the 500 Hz and 200 Hz crystal roofing filters installed, >>> which is the same configuration as I had before sending it to >>> Elecraft. >>> >>> >>> Any thoughts? >>> >>> >>> Tnx >>> >>> >>> Jim >>> >>> W6AIM Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Joe Subich, W4TV-4
Thanks for the detailed explanation. I was beginning to wonder when and
if someone would advance a valid explanation. 73 Bob, K4TAX K3S s/n 10163 On 10/18/2015 1:16 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote: > There will be a slight pop when changing bandwidth between 150 and 100 > Hz as the K3/K3S disables the RXEQ at bandwidths less than 150 Hz. The > level of the "pop" will be related to the amount of EQ in use *around* > *the center of the passband* (e.g., "pitch"). If for example, pitch is > 500 Hz and bands 4 (400 Hz) and 5 (800 Hz) are 0, there will be little > or no "pop". However, if one has 400/800 Hz set for significant boost > there will be a fairly loud "pop" as the level changes. > > 73, > > ... Joe, W4TV ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
The selection of IIR versus FIR filtering for the narrowest bandwidths
(50 Hz and 100 Hz) may also have some effect on this. In general, the K3 and K3S switch to a different filtering algorithm for these two bandwidths. The loading of coefficients and filter settling time -- and to some extent the difference in "energy" that may be stored in these filters from the last time they were selected and this time -- may combine to produce a small artifact during filter selection. I'll state again that using the Rx EQ to provide additional filtering doesn't work. The K3 creates a single filter that combines the bandwidth, center frequency, manual notch *and* RxEQ parameters. And in general it is a good idea to use rx EQ to tailor the audio response using cuts away from, rather than boosts of, preferred pitches, especially near pitches you are likely to want to monitor in CW operation. The intended purpose of the Rx EQ is to help tailor the radio to your speakers or headphones, not to provide selectivity or signal enhancement. 73, Lyle KK7P > Thanks for the detailed explanation. I was beginning to wonder when > and if someone would advance a valid explanation. > >> There will be a slight pop when changing bandwidth between 150 and 100 >> Hz as the K3/K3S disables the RXEQ at bandwidths less than 150 Hz. The >> level of the "pop" will be related to the amount of EQ in use *around* >> *the center of the passband* (e.g., "pitch")... ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Joe Subich, W4TV-4
I don't use any RXEQ and my pitch is usually between 400 and 450 Hz. Yes,
100->150 is "worse", although not particularly objectionable; a curiosity actually. But there are other pops too, 750->800 is about the same and there is also a dependence upon the shift. On 10/18/2015 11:16 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote: > > On 10/18/2015 11:46 AM, Wes (N7WS) wrote: >> As a point of reference, my old K3 with the original synthesizer >> board pops when changing BW. It's most noticeable going from 150 Hz >> to 100 Hz and vice versa. > > There will be a slight pop when changing bandwidth between 150 and 100 > Hz as the K3/K3S disables the RXEQ at bandwidths less than 150 Hz. The > level of the "pop" will be related to the amount of EQ in use *around* > *the center of the passband* (e.g., "pitch"). If for example, pitch is > 500 Hz and bands 4 (400 Hz) and 5 (800 Hz) are 0, there will be little > or no "pop". However, if one has 400/800 Hz set for significant boost > there will be a fairly loud "pop" as the level changes. > > 73, > > ... Joe, W4TV > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Jim Brown-10
Thanks Jim.
I used the Kenwood TS-480 when the rig was in the shop, and the audio was better, fewer pops and hiss, and the Noise Reduction was noticeably better on the Kenwood 480. Jim W6AIM . -----Original Message----- From: Elecraft [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Jim Brown Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2015 9:59 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 Popping noise in headphones?? On Fri,10/16/2015 11:15 PM, Jim Bolit wrote: > The popping is present as I rotate the BW control back to wider bandwidths also, but the popping stops once above 200 Hz bandwidth. Hi Jim, I also do a lot of digging for weak signals, but I rarely go narrower than 200 Hz because I find the filter ringing on noise takes over. Yes, I'm using the optimal setting to minimize ringing. If you're hearing the popping and others are not, perhaps you're using more AF gain and less RF gain than they are. If so, I suggest adjusting that ratio in the direction of less AF gain and see if you can reach a happy compromise. As an OT CW op, I do recognize the virtue of not using excessive RF gain. And maybe Wayne can do something about the switching transient in a future firmware firmware release. 73, Jim K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
