This presentation is interesting and informative.
Although the K3 is undoubtedly an excellent radio, why must we hide behind the price of it by showing the cost of other radios it is being compared to? >From my calculations, a K3 WITHOUT a band-scope or panadapter or spectrum display that is built up so that it is comparable in basic features to the Ten Tec Orion or ICOM 7800 or Yaesu FT9000 (which has a model that is significantly less than $10K), is pushing $4000. Any method you use to to add a spectrum display will push it over that in a hurry. I like to see honest advertising but one has to wonder about this sort of comparison. Dave ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Administrator
|
Hi Dave,
These are my slides, used from several past hamfest presentations. I certainly wasn't trying to hide behind anything. They were made available on the web site this morning at the request of several customers. The only reason the general price of several other radios were noted in the performance comparison table was to highlight how well the K3 receiver does in comparison, especially against the $10K plus radios. Even with the P3 panadapter, we'll be well below 1/2 of that. To be honest this is a very minor part of the slide presentation and I'll be glad to remove the price info if people wish. Except for the 7600, which has only been tested by Sherwood so far, all of the RX numbers in the table are from published ARRL reviews. Sherwood's numbers and those from the ARRL are usually in agreement within a couple of dB for these tests. 73, Eric WA6HHQ --- Dave-Boat Guy wrote: > This presentation is interesting and informative. > > Although the K3 is undoubtedly an excellent radio, why must we hide behind the price of it by showing the cost of other radios it is being compared to? > > >From my calculations, a K3 WITHOUT a band-scope or panadapter or spectrum display that is built up so that it is comparable in basic features to the Ten Tec Orion or ICOM 7800 or Yaesu FT9000 (which has a model that is significantly less than $10K), is pushing $4000. Any method you use to to add a spectrum display will push it over that in a hurry. > > I like to see honest advertising but one has to wonder about this sort of comparison. > > Dave > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Dave-Boat Guy
Dave Boat-Guy wrote:
> From my calculations, a K3 WITHOUT a band-scope or panadapter or spectrum display that is built up so that it is comparable in basic features to the Ten Tec Orion or ICOM 7800 or Yaesu FT9000 (which has a model that is significantly less than $10K), is pushing $4000. Any method you use to to add a spectrum display will push it over that in a hurry. > I like to see honest advertising but one has to wonder about this sort of comparison. One of the benefits of a modular approach like the K3 is that I'm not forced to pay for features I don't want or need. This includes stuff like AM, FM, General Coverage, ATU, etc. Why should I load up my <$3000 Dual Diversity K3 with features I don't need for a valid comparison? The problem with the approach of most other rigs is that I cannot delete features I don't want. IMHO this is their problem and one of the key reasons the K3 is such a good value if you use a little care in configuring it. 73, Bill W4ZV ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Dave-Boat Guy
This is just the US way of doing things. Here in the UK we get "Please contact us for price" which means they look at you to work out how much you can afford and double it. Keep it up Eric as the alternative is bad for customers. Incidentally I think your prices for competing rigs are a little on the low side.
Thanks for the slides - I could do with some specifically on DSP for a talk I am due to give. Mike |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |