-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Is the K3's S meter calibrated, or is there some provision for storing a S meter calibration table? Craig VK3HE -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify Version: Hush 2.5 wpwEAQECAAYFAkY1BzIACgkQFO3Fz3YpTj2fmgQAg4qFDjTfSD77Pa1D9kKLzE4HvFSP rtODwhC9xae856ZXRynhafUN/3ftVR1vzj/j6ut/24N77zKVXy1kk/et102co7IZrhIx dcWgwjWLAJzcWF6/bTJ5MRZAdSMsvkHdIhBmes+wkLz28jnYH19Abn/JEGdkgdLp7yar +UnYCcA= =AH/y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Want to work from home? Study to become a certified medical transcriptionist at these schools. http://tagline.hushmail.com/fc/CAaCXv1R3e2wJOeVT3OfwOENnb7OEC4R/ _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Administrator
|
<[hidden email]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Is the K3's S meter calibrated, or is there some provision for > storing a S meter calibration table? There are S-meter ZERO and SCALE menu entries, although the default settings will usually result in 50 microvolts = "S9", the most widely-accepted standard. 73, Wayne N6KR --- http://www.elecraft.com _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Wayne,
Just as a data point, in case you don't know -- the Omni-VII features a calibrated S-meter (50 uV = S9, 1 S-unit = 6 dB) on all bands, and it always reads the same for a given signal level regardless of the state of pre-amps or attenuators switched in/out. IOW, the calibration is based (always) on the nominal signal level at the 1st mixer. I personally think this is the "right" way to do an S-meter, but the market hasn't spoken on this. :-) Don't know if Omni-VII owners will like this or not. My guess is it will produce "low" (by comparison to other current radios) S-meter readings on 6M, for example. Bill / W5WVO wayne burdick wrote: > <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Is the K3's S meter calibrated, or is there some provision for >> storing a S meter calibration table? > > There are S-meter ZERO and SCALE menu entries, although the default > settings will usually result in 50 microvolts = "S9", the most > widely-accepted standard. > > 73, > Wayne > N6KR > > --- > > http://www.elecraft.com > > _______________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: [hidden email] > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Administrator
|
I think 3.5 to 4 dB per S-unit is closer to operator expectations,
Bill, but I'm sure TT has their reasons. We do agree on 50 uV = S9. Whether the S-meter compensates for the preamp and attenuator is an interesting subject; we might provide a menu entry to turn this on/off. 73, Wayne N6KR On Apr 29, 2007, at 5:15 PM, Bill W5WVO wrote: > Wayne, > > Just as a data point, in case you don't know -- the Omni-VII features > a calibrated S-meter (50 uV = S9, 1 S-unit = 6 dB) on all bands, and > it always reads the same for a given signal level regardless of the > state of pre-amps or attenuators switched in/out. > --- http://www.elecraft.com _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Hmmm... I just went back through my reflector mail as well as the published
Omni-VII literature, and I can't find anywhere it says 6 dB per S-unit. I could have swore that I read that. Could be I assumed it, though... That used to be one of the "standards" in days gone by... LONG gone by... Just did the math based on S9 = 50 uV, and if you figure 1 uV for S0, you get 3.775 dB per S-unit, pretty much what you said. If you use 6 dB per S-unit, a 0.25 uV signal (nominal minimum detectable) would be between an S1 and an S2. Is this "right"? On the face of it, it doesn't seem so -- but if you go by the old-time verbal strength descriptions for the S scale, an S1 is a "barely perceptible" signal. Neglecting any atmospheric noise floor for the moment, a barely perceptible signal in a modern HF receiver would be about 0.25 uV, so by these lights, maybe the 6 dB per S-unit isn't so far off. Maybe 5 dB makes the most sense, since this places the minimal detectable signal near S0, and anything above that would move the S-meter (including the atmospheric noise floor). I think that would be my vote. Bill / W5WVO wayne burdick wrote: > I think 3.5 to 4 dB per S-unit is closer to operator expectations, > Bill, but I'm sure TT has their reasons. > > We do agree on 50 uV = S9. Whether the S-meter compensates for the > preamp and attenuator is an interesting subject; we might provide a > menu entry to turn this on/off. > > 73, > Wayne > N6KR > > > On Apr 29, 2007, at 5:15 PM, Bill W5WVO wrote: > >> Wayne, >> >> Just as a data point, in case you don't know -- the Omni-VII features >> a calibrated S-meter (50 uV = S9, 1 S-unit = 6 dB) on all bands, and >> it always reads the same for a given signal level regardless of the >> state of pre-amps or attenuators switched in/out. > >> --- > > http://www.elecraft.com _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Wayne, are we going to be able to use the existing microphones for
the K3? I have the mobile mic for the K2, as well as the desk mic and the Heil headset all wired for Kenwood. Stan Rife W5EWA Houston, TX K2 S/N 4216 -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Bill W5WVO Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 12:05 AM To: wayne burdick Cc: [hidden email] Subject: [Elecraft] Re: K3 S meter Hmmm... I just went back through my reflector mail as well as the published Omni-VII literature, and I can't find anywhere it says 6 dB per S-unit. I could have swore that I read that. Could be I assumed it, though... That used to be one of the "standards" in days gone by... LONG gone by... Just did the math based on S9 = 50 uV, and if you figure 1 uV for S0, you get 3.775 dB per S-unit, pretty much what you said. If you use 6 dB per S-unit, a 0.25 uV signal (nominal minimum detectable) would be between an S1 and an S2. Is this "right"? On the face of it, it doesn't seem so -- but if you go by the old-time verbal strength descriptions for the S scale, an S1 is a "barely perceptible" signal. Neglecting any atmospheric noise floor for the moment, a barely perceptible signal in a modern HF receiver would be about 0.25 uV, so by these lights, maybe the 6 dB per S-unit isn't so far off. Maybe 5 dB makes the most sense, since this places the minimal detectable signal near S0, and anything above that would move the S-meter (including the atmospheric noise floor). I think that would be my vote. Bill / W5WVO wayne burdick wrote: > I think 3.5 to 4 dB per S-unit is closer to operator expectations, > Bill, but I'm sure TT has their reasons. > > We do agree on 50 uV = S9. Whether the S-meter compensates for the > preamp and attenuator is an interesting subject; we might provide a > menu entry to turn this on/off. > > 73, > Wayne > N6KR > > > On Apr 29, 2007, at 5:15 PM, Bill W5WVO wrote: > >> Wayne, >> >> Just as a data point, in case you don't know -- the Omni-VII features >> a calibrated S-meter (50 uV = S9, 1 S-unit = 6 dB) on all bands, and >> it always reads the same for a given signal level regardless of the >> state of pre-amps or attenuators switched in/out. > >> --- > > http://www.elecraft.com _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Administrator
|
Yes. The K3 8 pin mic connector is wired the same as the K2 using the
Kenwood pinout. Plus we added a lot more mic pre-amp gain (adjustable) in the K3. 73, Eric WA6HHQ --- Stan Rife wrote: > Wayne, are we going to be able to use the existing microphones for > the K3? I have the mobile mic for the K2, as well as the desk mic and the > Heil headset all wired for Kenwood. > > Stan Rife > W5EWA > Houston, TX > K2 S/N 4216 > > _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft wrote: > Yes. The K3 8 pin mic connector is wired the same as the K2 using the > Kenwood pinout. Plus we added a lot more mic pre-amp gain (adjustable) > in the K3. > Ah. My first K3 rework - my K2s are wired to match Yaesu. Please don't hide the traces! thanks for putting up with me in the booth at Visalia! - jeff wk6i -- Jeff Stai [hidden email] Twisted Oak Winery http://www.twistedoak.com/ Winery Blog http://www.elbloggotorcido.com/ _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ
Can the K3's connector be configured for other microphones
at the time of assembly? My K2 is set up for my Icom mics, since I have seven of 'em, including a Heil HS ... and no others. 73! Ken Kopp - K0PP [hidden email] _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |