|
Does the TX-INH state over-ride all other TX commands?
I am trying to find a very simple way of preventing the K3 from transmitting for more than (say) 10 mins when used remotely. I can tell if it has gone into transmit by looking at the KEY-OUT. What I need is a way of unconditionally killing any transmit, and I am hoping the setting TX-INH will do that. Since I use cat TX control, I imagine the only alternative is to become a man in the middle of the CAT interface, relaying the RS232 bytes back and fourth and interjecting an RX command if I detect the timeout state. This fails my criteria that failsafes must be so simple they are obviously bug free. 73 Stewart ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
Hi Stewart,
what's the reason behind? If you want to make sure the remote K3 does not stay in TX state when you loose the connection it depends on your solution. If you're using the Remoterig boxes they take care of it automatically. As soon as the connection between both controllers fails the remote RRC shuts down the remote K3 completely. Concerning TX-INH: Yes, you can do it that way. This is what I use in my K3 sequencer, too. Detect PTT from KEY-OUT as the trigger. Keep TX-INH pin high or low (depending on menu setting) to avoid any RF until you release it. The K3 will be in transmit mode but not emit any power when TX-INH locked. 73, Olli - DH8BQA http://www.dh8bqa.de > Stewart Bryant <[hidden email]> hat am 5. März 2015 um 11:10 geschrieben: > > > Does the TX-INH state over-ride all other TX commands? > > I am trying to find a very simple way of preventing the > K3 from transmitting for more than (say) 10 mins when > used remotely. > > I can tell if it has gone into transmit by looking at the > KEY-OUT. What I need is a way of unconditionally > killing any transmit, and I am hoping the setting > TX-INH will do that. > > Since I use cat TX control, I imagine the only > alternative is to become a man in the middle > of the CAT interface, relaying the RS232 bytes > back and fourth and interjecting an RX command > if I detect the timeout state. This fails my > criteria that failsafes must be so simple > they are obviously bug free. > > 73 > > Stewart > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
On 05/03/2015 10:28, [hidden email] wrote:
> Hi Stewart, > what's the reason behind? If you want to make sure the remote K3 does > not stay in TX state when you loose the connection it depends on your > solution. If you're using the Remoterig boxes they take care of it > automatically. As soon as the connection between both controllers > fails the remote RRC shuts down the remote K3 completely. Thanks Olli I plan to go the teamviewer/skype/HRD route - a little voice but mainly data (PSK and WSPR). The remote h/w is too much to carry on a plane or into the office etc. I just want a use stuff I already carry such as my macbook. > Concerning TX-INH: Yes, you can do it that way. This is what I use in > my K3 sequencer, too. Detect PTT from KEY-OUT as the trigger. Keep > TX-INH pin high or low (depending on menu setting) to avoid any RF > until you release it. The K3 will be in transmit mode but not emit any > power when TX-INH locked. OK that sounds good, but if it is already transmitting will TX-INH override any other TX commands (such as an active TX; command) and unconditionally take it back to RX? BTW I am surprised that there is not an addon that provides ToT and also command system on, two feature that are standard in all of the otherwise rather less capable transceivers. 73 Stewart/G3YSX > 73, Olli - DH8BQA > http://www.dh8bqa.de > > > Stewart Bryant <[hidden email]> hat am 5. März 2015 um 11:10 > geschrieben: > > > > > > Does the TX-INH state over-ride all other TX commands? > > > > I am trying to find a very simple way of preventing the > > K3 from transmitting for more than (say) 10 mins when > > used remotely. > > > > I can tell if it has gone into transmit by looking at the > > KEY-OUT. What I need is a way of unconditionally > > killing any transmit, and I am hoping the setting > > TX-INH will do that. > > > > Since I use cat TX control, I imagine the only > > alternative is to become a man in the middle > > of the CAT interface, relaying the RS232 bytes > > back and fourth and interjecting an RX command > > if I detect the timeout state. This fails my > > criteria that failsafes must be so simple > > they are obviously bug free. > > > > 73 > > > > Stewart > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > > Elecraft mailing list > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
Stewart,
The K3 will not emit RF when the TX INH is active. But it will stay in a TX state and does not go back to RX. To do as you want, you would have to use KEYOUT to start a timer whose output is with TX INH inactive and after some period of time would turn TX INH on and stay that way. 73, Don W3FPR On 3/5/2015 6:02 AM, Stewart Bryant wrote: > On 05/03/2015 10:28, [hidden email] wrote: >> Hi Stewart, >> what's the reason behind? If you want to make sure the remote K3 does >> not stay in TX state when you loose the connection it depends on your >> solution. If you're using the Remoterig boxes they take care of it >> automatically. As soon as the connection between both controllers >> fails the remote RRC shuts down the remote K3 completely. > Thanks Olli > > I plan to go the teamviewer/skype/HRD route - a little voice but > mainly data (PSK and WSPR). The remote h/w is too much to carry on a > plane or into the office etc. I just want a use stuff I already carry > such as my macbook. >> Concerning TX-INH: Yes, you can do it that way. This is what I use in >> my K3 sequencer, too. Detect PTT from KEY-OUT as the trigger. Keep >> TX-INH pin high or low (depending on menu setting) to avoid any RF >> until you release it. The K3 will be in transmit mode but not emit >> any power when TX-INH locked. > OK that sounds good, but if it is already transmitting will TX-INH > override any other TX commands (such as an active TX; command) > and unconditionally take it back to RX? > > BTW I am surprised that there is not an addon that provides ToT and > also command system on, two feature that are standard in all of the > otherwise rather less capable transceivers. > > 73 Stewart/G3YSX > > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
