|
Administrator
|
Let's end this thread at this time in the interest of relieving other readers
from overload. If you feel compelled to continue the CW b/w discussion, please take it to private email. 73, Eric /elecraft.com/ On 3/30/2016 8:18 AM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote: > One could discourse all day on what "proper" is in this context without > ever a precise consensus among educated gentlemen. At some point of "ugly" > we would all agree that anything that sounds like that is improper. > > When the only stateful levels were strictly on and off, and the rise and > fall transition time amplitude curves were set by a resistor and a > capacitor, one could make some simplifications in the discussion. > > Today, often, as in the K3, the rise and fall times and shapes of CW are > DATA which goes DIRECTLY to RF via a DAC. For these the nature of the rise > and fall curve is not governed by a charge/discharge time of analog > components, but rather by whatever function generated the waveshape data, > which is stored, *read* as needed and never generated real time. In many > cases it is far more accurate to say that the rise and fall of a baud is > INTRODUCED, rather than the signal is keyed. > > If the rise and fall data curves used for "keying" vary their "sharpness" > according to speed, then the description bandwidth increases by speed > certainly does apply. But if not, the bandwidth is governed by the pulse > generated by the rise and fall data, which could be the exact same from 1 > wpm to 40 wpm. > > We are so easily diverted into our lifelong, unconscious, and utterly > habitual analog thinking (note that I certainly do not give myself a free > pass here). > > I was just looking at the P3 display of some traditional BC band stations > around here. A 30 over 9 station at 1490 kHz fills up 1480 to 1500. Using > the K3's AM-S mode on USB side the S9 station at 1500 kHz is clearly > intelligible, but the standard demodulation for 1500 is obliterated by the > 1490 station. That ain't your granddaddy's AM out there any more. That's > some really complicated stuff that completely fills up +/- 10 kHz and > clearly not done the same from station to station. I'm going to save > googling that for a free evening when I don't have something broken to fix. > > There is so much stuff I was taught by my WCTT Chief Engineer Elmer that I > am having to set aside. > > > 73, Guy K2AV > > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> On 3/30/2016 12:21 AM, Jim Brown wrote: >>> Unfortunately the guys who wrote the rules failed to understand the >>> physics and the math. >> No Jim, you are wrong here. CW is a carrier modulated by a digital >> (on/off keyed) signal of a given (baud) rate. That keying will >> generate sidebands +/- the baud rate *just like FSK* or even AM which >> can be observed on a spectrum analyzer. The ITU formula is quite >> accurate in terms of the actual bandwidth for signals with *properly* >> *shaped keying*. >> >> Again, the excess bandwidth from improperly shaped keying signals >> (clicks) and/or amplifier distortion is something else. >> >> 73, >> >> ... Joe, W4TV >> >> > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Jim Finan
Yes, indeed it was the "Lady Lex".
Sent from my iPhone ...nr4c. bill > On Mar 30, 2016, at 8:34 AM, Jim Finan <[hidden email]> wrote: > > I believe that was the 'Lexington' > > Jim Finan > AB4AC > Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone. > Original Message > From: [hidden email] > Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 10:03 PM > To: [hidden email] > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] [K3] CW Speed & bandwidth (was Tokyo Hy-Power HL-1.2KFX amp interfacing (to ALC or not to ALC?)) > > I thought the Enterprise was lost at the battle of the Coral Sea. Must > be some sort of time looping going on here. > Kevin. KD5ONS > >> On 3/29/2016 6:52 PM, Dave Cole wrote: >>> On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 17:42 -0700, Fred Jensen wrote: >>> Like trying to drive faster than light, discarding angular momentum, >>> or resigning from Linked-In. >> WHAT!! I know you are wrong here, else the Enterprise could not work! > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
Administrator
|
Folks, let's also end this thread.
73, Eric Moderator for life. /elecraft.com/ On 3/30/2016 8:38 AM, Nr4c wrote: > Yes, indeed it was the "Lady Lex". > > Sent from my iPhone > ...nr4c. bill > > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Guy Olinger K2AV
Guy has it exactly right.
73, Jim K9YC On Wed,3/30/2016 8:18 AM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote: > If the rise and fall data curves used for "keying" vary their "sharpness" > according to speed, then the description bandwidth increases by speed > certainly does apply. But if not, the bandwidth is governed by the pulse > generated by the rise and fall data, which could be the exact same from 1 > wpm to 40 wpm. > > We are so easily diverted into our lifelong, unconscious, and utterly > habitual analog thinking (note that I certainly do not give myself a free > pass here). ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
Administrator
|
Thread has been ended.
Eric Moderator /elecraft.com/ On 3/30/2016 9:01 AM, Jim Brown wrote: > Guy has it exactly right. > > 73, Jim K9YC > > On Wed,3/30/2016 8:18 AM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote: >> If the rise and fall data curves used for "keying" vary their "sharpness" >> according to speed, then the description bandwidth increases by speed >> certainly does apply. But if not, the bandwidth is governed by the pulse >> generated by the rise and fall data, which could be the exact same from 1 >> wpm to 40 wpm. >> >> We are so easily diverted into our lifelong, unconscious, and utterly >> habitual analog thinking (note that I certainly do not give myself a free >> pass here). > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by John Shadle
Read: http://www.comportco.com/~w5alt/cw/cwindex.php?pg=5
"CW Bandwidth" by W5ALT seems everyone in this debate has some valid points. I found this by searching on "CW bandwidth". 73, Ed - KL7UW http://www.kl7uw.com "Kits made by KL7UW" Dubus Mag business: [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
