|
See http://www.sherweng.com/table.html
_______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
|
Those numbers are big ... Congratulations to Eric, Wayne and the rest of the development team. To combine the best close spaced dynamic range (by a wide margin), ultimate sensitivity as good or better than the other top performers and the best phase noise number is absolutely outstanding. I wonder how long it will be before other makers stop pushing their claims as the highest performing HF + 6 M amateur radio transceiver available? 73, ... Joe, W4TV > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] > [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Gary Hvizdak > Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2008 11:31 PM > To: [hidden email] > Subject: [Elecraft] K3 Tops the List! > Importance: High > > > See http://www.sherweng.com/table.html > > _______________________________________________ > _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
|
You can bet the marketers at Ikensu are trying to come up with a suitably
ambiguous set of weasel-words even as we speak. :-) Bill W5WVO Joe Subich, W4TV wrote: > I wonder how long it will be before other makers stop pushing > their claims as the highest performing HF + 6 M amateur radio > transceiver available? _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
|
In reply to this post by Gary Hvizdak
It looks like all the top radios are American Made
Mike, N4GW -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Gary Hvizdak Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2008 11:31 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: [Elecraft] K3 Tops the List! Importance: High See http://www.sherweng.com/table.html _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
|
In reply to this post by Gary Hvizdak
While the figures are excellent, I suspect Elecraft will want to do better. A dynamic range of 101 dB at 2kHz is remarkable.
I am surprised a crystal filter can take the power for a 140 dB blocking dynamic range. The post mixer amplifier must have been very difficult to design as I recon it would be producing nearly a watt under those conditions. I wonder if it is physically possible to do anything about the far out dynamic range beyond 10kHz which is a "mere" 104 dB. We already know we want 140dB to cope with 40m broadcast signals from 7.1-7.3 MHz and while the phase noise is an issue, a narrow band LC filter in the IF in front of the crystal filter may help a little. Maybe an LC notch filter to put on the strong broadcasters? Mike
|
|
> I wonder if it is physically possible to do anything about the far out
> dynamic range beyond 10kHz which is a "mere" 104 dB. Take a look at <http://www.xs4all.nl/~martein/pa3ake/hmode/>: This is a quote from the conclusion: It turns out to be quite possible to construct a frontend with a dynamic range in excess of 120dB in SSB bandwidth on 40M. The best news maybe is that it is possible with components that are readily available today. No impossible to get specialized surplus parts are needed. Everything is still off-the-shelf, also the special QT crystals used in the roofing filter. However good quality polystyrene capacitors may become more and more a problem as many manufacturers have stopped production of those capacitors as far as I know years ago. Most certainly alternative good RF grade caps will remain available, although probably a bit expensive. <http://www.xs4all.nl/~martein/pa3ake/hmode/conclusion.html> vy 73 de toby _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
|
Hi Toby,
The 120db dynamic range is possible with both signals in the passband IF everything which follows the hybrid crystal filter is very robust and its noise figure is low, a low noise figure to keep the gain ahead of the filter as low as possible of course. My QT crystals are to be delivered soon :-) 73, Geoff GM4ESD Toby <[hidden email]> wrote: > This is a quote from the conclusion: > > It turns out to be quite possible to construct a frontend with a dynamic > range in excess of 120dB in SSB bandwidth on 40M. The best news maybe is > that it is possible with components that are readily available today. No > impossible to get specialized surplus parts are needed. Everything is > still off-the-shelf, also the special QT crystals used in the roofing > filter. However good quality polystyrene capacitors may become more and > more a problem as many manufacturers have stopped production of those > capacitors as far as I know years ago. Most certainly alternative good RF > grade caps will remain available, although probably a bit expensive. > > <http://www.xs4all.nl/~martein/pa3ake/hmode/conclusion.html> > > > vy 73 de toby _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
|
In reply to this post by Gary Hvizdak
I'm going to suggest an engineering change to make the fans
noisier so you don't need to look. 8^) Doug, W6JD -------------- Original message -------------- From: Don Rasmussen <[hidden email]> > > The receiver is QUIET, even with narrow filter > settings. > > You need to LOOK to see if the fan is running, there > is no fan noise. > >.elecraft.com _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
