|
This is my third month with the K3 and I really
wondered how I'd get along with it. They told me that Wayne had user interface experience and he'd focused on that aspect in the K3 design. Frankly, those four "push pots" to the left of the main tuning knob concerned me, as did the convenience of "all those" press and hold labels on the front panel. Come to find out, it's very convenient and intuitive - much more than I had expected. And the "deal killer" items, like having AF and RF gain controls on a shared multi knob all seem to have been sensibly avoided. In short - this is a transceiver you can easily live with. I've been telling my ham friends that there are many "K3 class" quality DSP transceivers available these days, like OMNI 7, Flex, and Orion. I still feel that for single receiver performance, these are valid competitors to K3. Recently I took the time to go to the Ten Tec website and watch the videos for their latest offerings and the distinctions of user interface were undeniable. There is a central screen with ever changing content and format, and multi function buttons around that screen along with a fairly extensive use of the "multi knob" in normal operation. I imagine all that could be learned, but I'd need a legend like the old "WordPerfect" keyboard legends just to get around. Take a look at the VFO assignment buttons on the Orion video for example. The flexibility is marvelous, but with the status lights next to the controls combined with on screen mixed case text and drawn graphics - It's quite a lot. http://radio.tentec.com/video For my operation, enjoying fundamentally good RF performance in the simplest to operate package that's available, K3 wins hands down. There are a finite number of icons on the display, they are arranged in considered size and location. I can't speak to the Flex UI, just know that I need a main tuning knob on my transceiver and it also better be instant on. Those who enjoy booting WinDoze to operate might enjoy that interface. I'm here to say that those who have K3 need to take a look at the Ten Tec videos and imagine how the K3 features you use would be enabled on those radios. Those that don't have your K3's yet have a very impressive feature coming that's maybe not being stressed so much along with the other K3 development issues. In fairness, I have to say that IC756Pro was mostly as UI functional as K3 with the exception of those tiny small pots at the bottom of the set, a truly decent organizational effort by Icom, but the receiver was insufferable on CW so it pretty well went to waste on me. Artifacts, poor AGC, high DSP filter noise keeps me using the American designs, K3's UI is real icing on the cake. de wb8yqj .. _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
|
Having had (suffered) through an Orion experience, I can assure you the K3
is much easier to learn and much more intuitive. The interface looked daunting at first but it comes together very well. My hat is off to Wayne and Eric. Also, the firmware upgrades on the K3 are very easy while the Orion never worked the first, second or third times. I recently played with an FT9000 and IC7800 and I will gladly take the K3 over either of them. The K3 is a gem. k4ia Craig "Buck" Fredericksburg, Virginia USA **************Planning your summer road trip? Check out AOL Travel Guides. (http://travel.aol.com/travel-guide/united-states?ncid=aoltrv00030000000016) _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
