|
Question for those users/designers of the K3 sub receiver and split capabilities: Refering to manual version C1.November 18, 2007, page 35: The discussion about using split mode with the "sub" is confusing. Let me explain what I think the manual is saying and if it's incorrect let me know: In split I receive with the main receiver on VFO A, and transmit on VFO B. When the sub is on, I can receive on VFO_sub. Does the sub have a VFO label during split? What is the label of this "VFO_sub" ? So in split, to review: I am listening on VFO_A, Transmitting on VFO_B and listening also on VFO_sub ? Is there a capability in the K3 to make the frequency for VFO_sub follow and be the same as whatever frequency is set on VFO_B and vice versa (VFO_B tracks and is set to whatever VFO_sub is set to). By follow, I define that as when I set VFO_sub, the VFO_B is set to be the same. And by vice versa, I define that as when I set VFO_B, the VFO_sub is set to be the same. The problem I see (or made up) is that I see the benefit of having VFO_sub to listen to the pile up in split, but without a coupling of VFO_sub and VFO_B then it would require setting both the Tx VFO_B and VFO_sub. The use case scenario: Go split Turn on sub Set VFO_A to a frequency of the DX transmitter Set VFO_sub to a frequency of VFO_A (for reference) Listening to the DX, you learn the approximate frequency to Transmit on. Set VFO_B to that frequency Set VFO_sub to VFO_B frequency (manually?) Now as I listen to the DX on VFO_A for adjustments to his listening frequency, I adjust VFO_sub .. When I find the frequency DX is listening on, I'm ready to transmit but then I'll have to re-adjust VFO_B to match the frequency I want to transmit on based on my scan of VFO_sub.. What am I missing here? Are VFO_B and VFO_sub coupled in any way? If they're not coupled in firmware for their frequency assignment, then I can see (or made up) a problem of having to track the best frequency to set VFO_B and setting VFO_sub. I'll be setting one to listen where to make my transmission and it would be great if the VFO_B was ready. The way I read this manual, it sounds like I have the benefit of listening to VFO_B prior to transmitting via listening to VFO_sub, however the macination of setting VFO_sub to find the right frequency is half the work: I also have to re-set VFO_B before I transmit. -jeff K3 and goodies ordered January. _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
|
> Question for those users/designers of the K3 sub receiver and split
> capabilities... The sub receives on VFO B. 73, Lyle KK7P _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
|
Well, that answers that. Withdraw the question. Thanks. -jeff On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, Lyle Johnson wrote: >> Question for those users/designers of the K3 sub receiver and split >> capabilities... > > The sub receives on VFO B. > > 73, > > Lyle KK7P > _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
