I know there has been a recent thread about headphones,
but this time I would like to focus on just the receive aspect, as I need to buy a set of 'cans' for use 90% use with cw. What I am really confused by is the K3's stereo rx capabilities, with *ONLY* the main receiver. (Looks like the headphones cost a 1/3 as much, as the 2nd receiver will) Does the Heil Proset allow for the stereo (separate channels)? It doesn't specifically say so..... but the Heil Proset Plus does mention stereo Here is the Heil Proset: http://www.heilsound.com/amateur/products/proset/index.htm "Besides sealing out noise passively, the Pro Set now includes Heil Sound's exclusive phase reversal technology, which allows the user to "move" the incoming signal by engaging the phase-reversal switch; this creates a unique spatial widening sound that can, in some situations, significantly improve copy in a tough DX pile-up." "The earphone speakers in the Pro Set Series are 200too-Ohm devices, with a -3 dB point at 8000 Hz. This combination reduces a lot of the hiss found in receiver audio stages. These speakers exhibit medium sensitivity, but they are easily driven by most rigs if you turn the AF Gain control up to about 2 o'clock." == Here is the Heil ProsetPlus: http://www.heilsound.com/amateur/products/prosetplus/index.htm "The Pro Set Plus is wired in a stereo configuration, making them easy to integrate into your SO2R station, and ideal for rigs like the FT-1000D that have a "Balance" control for Main and Sub receiver audio levels." "Also provided on the Pro Set Plus is Heil Sound's exclusive phase reversal technology, which allows the user to "move" the incoming signal by engaging the phase-reversal switch; this creates a unique spatial widening sound that can, in some situations, significantly improve copy in a tough DX pile-up." === I don't plan to operate voice, so I really don't need a mic attached, but it would seem those 2 headphones are among the best as far as long term comfort and ability to do stereo and noise reduction. Are there any other headphones the group would recommended for cw and taking advantage of the K3's stereo capabilities? I guess if I have to have a mike included I'll just have to deal with it. ;-/ TIA -- GB & 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Sam,
With the K3's excellent receive EQ capability, you can tailor the receive sound most anyway you want, with most any headphones you want. The Yamaha CM500's are very popular and cost a ton less than Heil. I have both the Yamaha and Heil and switch back and forth - they both have their plusses and minuses. I also use Shure E2C earphones (insert into the ear canal) for a change of pace and to reduce ear fatigue. Watch your levels though with any of these. I would suggest finding headphones that you find to be most physically comfortable at a reasonable price and then use the K3 EQ to suit your ears. The Yamaha CM500's are probably the best bang for the buck. 73, Bob W5OV (NJ5DX in WPX CW) -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Sam Morgan Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 7:12 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: [Elecraft] K3 Which headphones for stereo cw work? I know there has been a recent thread about headphones, but this time I would like to focus on just the receive aspect, as I need to buy a set of 'cans' for use 90% use with cw. What I am really confused by is the K3's stereo rx capabilities, with *ONLY* the main receiver. (Looks like the headphones cost a 1/3 as much, as the 2nd receiver will) Does the Heil Proset allow for the stereo (separate channels)? It doesn't specifically say so..... but the Heil Proset Plus does mention stereo Here is the Heil Proset: http://www.heilsound.com/amateur/products/proset/index.htm "Besides sealing out noise passively, the Pro Set now includes Heil Sound's exclusive phase reversal technology, which allows the user to "move" the incoming signal by engaging the phase-reversal switch; this creates a unique spatial widening sound that can, in some situations, significantly improve copy in a tough DX pile-up." "The earphone speakers in the Pro Set Series are 200too-Ohm devices, with a -3 dB point at 8000 Hz. This combination reduces a lot of the hiss found in receiver audio stages. These speakers exhibit medium sensitivity, but they are easily driven by most rigs if you turn the AF Gain control up to about 2 o'clock." == Here is the Heil ProsetPlus: http://www.heilsound.com/amateur/products/prosetplus/index.htm "The Pro Set Plus is wired in a stereo configuration, making them easy to integrate into your SO2R station, and ideal for rigs like the FT-1000D that have a "Balance" control for Main and Sub receiver audio levels." "Also provided on the Pro Set Plus is Heil Sound's exclusive phase reversal technology, which allows the user to "move" the incoming signal by engaging the phase-reversal switch; this creates a unique spatial widening sound that can, in some situations, significantly improve copy in a tough DX pile-up." === I don't plan to operate voice, so I really don't need a mic attached, but it would seem those 2 headphones are among the best as far as long term comfort and ability to do stereo and noise reduction. Are there any other headphones the group would recommended for cw and taking advantage of the K3's stereo capabilities? I guess if I have to have a mike included I'll just have to deal with it. ;-/ TIA -- GB & 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by k5oai
Yes, just like the Proset Plus. But I prefer the latter as they seem more
sensitive. 73 Geoff G3UCK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sam Morgan" <[hidden email]> > Does the Heil Proset allow for the stereo (separate channels)? > It doesn't specifically say so..... ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by k5oai
Sam,
I am not certain why you looking only at Heil. Their products are somewhat overpriced IMHO. I suggest you go to a place that deals in consumer audio - Best Buy, Circuit City, or even Target stores (Sam Ashe too) and look at what they have. The popularity of iPods and other such devices have made decent headphones readily available and at a variety of prices ranging from inexpensive to very high dollar. Find a set of headphones that fit your ears and feel like they will be comfortable after wearing them for a while. If they sound good listening to music, they will sound good on the K3 too. If you want to customize the response of the K3, that is what the RX EQ is for - use it instead of spending a great price for so-called "communications" headphones. The wireless models free you from the attached cord problem and give you freedom of movement, but before deciding on one of those, check the store's return policy - you will want to return them if you have problems with RF pickup in your shack. 73, Don W3FPR Sam Morgan wrote: > I know there has been a recent thread about headphones, > but this time I would like to focus on just the receive aspect, > as I need to buy a set of 'cans' for use 90% use with cw. > > > What I am really confused by is the K3's stereo rx capabilities, > with *ONLY* the main receiver. > (Looks like the headphones cost a 1/3 as much, as the 2nd receiver will) > > Does the Heil Proset allow for the stereo (separate channels)? > It doesn't specifically say so..... > but the Heil Proset Plus does mention stereo > > Here is the Heil Proset: > http://www.heilsound.com/amateur/products/proset/index.htm > > "Besides sealing out noise passively, the Pro Set now includes Heil Sound's > exclusive phase reversal technology, which allows the user to "move" the > incoming signal by engaging the phase-reversal switch; this creates a unique > spatial widening sound that can, in some situations, significantly improve copy > in a tough DX pile-up." > > "The earphone speakers in the Pro Set Series are 200too-Ohm devices, with a -3 > dB point at 8000 Hz. This combination reduces a lot of the hiss found in > receiver audio stages. These speakers exhibit medium sensitivity, but they are > easily driven by most rigs if you turn the AF Gain control up to about 2 o'clock." > > == > > Here is the Heil ProsetPlus: > http://www.heilsound.com/amateur/products/prosetplus/index.htm > > "The Pro Set Plus is wired in a stereo configuration, making them easy to > integrate into your SO2R station, and ideal for rigs like the FT-1000D that have > a "Balance" control for Main and Sub receiver audio levels." > > "Also provided on the Pro Set Plus is Heil Sound's exclusive phase reversal > technology, which allows the user to "move" the incoming signal by engaging the > phase-reversal switch; this creates a unique spatial widening sound that can, in > some situations, significantly improve copy in a tough DX pile-up." > === > > I don't plan to operate voice, so I really don't need a mic attached, > but it would seem those 2 headphones are among the best as far as long term > comfort and ability to do stereo and noise reduction. > > Are there any other headphones the group would recommended for cw and taking > advantage of the K3's stereo capabilities? > > I guess if I have to have a mike included I'll just have to deal with it. ;-/ > > TIA > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by k5oai
Sam,
While popular, the amateur grade headsets are very poor quality and a poor value compared to good stereo headsets. I found two very good headsets for mine. One type is a noise cancelling Phillips headset I bought at a local Ace hardware for $20, and the very best I have ever had are Sennheiser HD280 pro headsets. Both headsets sound great, block out room noise (even without noise cancelling), and are most important very comfortable. One feature of the HD280 pro is they have a coiled cord that is long. This keeps the cord out of my way and off the floor, while still allowing me to move. For SSB I use a Sennheiser headset with attached electrets microphone. It works perfectly with the K3 and reports are it sounds excellent. As for the "phase reversal technology", it only has a useful effect in mono. It is just a phase reversing switch on one earpiece. In stereo, it is meaningless because the K3's audio phase between channels rotates constantly as frequency is changed. Mine are so much better than the headsets people bring over for contests there is no comparison. 73 Tom ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sam Morgan" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 8:11 AM Subject: [Elecraft] K3 Which headphones for stereo cw work? >I know there has been a recent thread about headphones, > but this time I would like to focus on just the receive > aspect, > as I need to buy a set of 'cans' for use 90% use with cw. > > > What I am really confused by is the K3's stereo rx > capabilities, > with *ONLY* the main receiver. > (Looks like the headphones cost a 1/3 as much, as the 2nd > receiver will) > > Does the Heil Proset allow for the stereo (separate > channels)? > It doesn't specifically say so..... > but the Heil Proset Plus does mention stereo > > Here is the Heil Proset: > http://www.heilsound.com/amateur/products/proset/index.htm > > "Besides sealing out noise passively, the Pro Set now > includes Heil Sound's > exclusive phase reversal technology, which allows the user > to "move" the > incoming signal by engaging the phase-reversal switch; > this creates a unique > spatial widening sound that can, in some situations, > significantly improve copy > in a tough DX pile-up." > > "The earphone speakers in the Pro Set Series are > 200too-Ohm devices, with a -3 > dB point at 8000 Hz. This combination reduces a lot of the > hiss found in > receiver audio stages. These speakers exhibit medium > sensitivity, but they are > easily driven by most rigs if you turn the AF Gain control > up to about 2 o'clock." > > == > > Here is the Heil ProsetPlus: > http://www.heilsound.com/amateur/products/prosetplus/index.htm > > "The Pro Set Plus is wired in a stereo configuration, > making them easy to > integrate into your SO2R station, and ideal for rigs like > the FT-1000D that have > a "Balance" control for Main and Sub receiver audio > levels." > > "Also provided on the Pro Set Plus is Heil Sound's > exclusive phase reversal > technology, which allows the user to "move" the incoming > signal by engaging the > phase-reversal switch; this creates a unique spatial > widening sound that can, in > some situations, significantly improve copy in a tough DX > pile-up." > === > > I don't plan to operate voice, so I really don't need a > mic attached, > but it would seem those 2 headphones are among the best as > far as long term > comfort and ability to do stereo and noise reduction. > > Are there any other headphones the group would recommended > for cw and taking > advantage of the K3's stereo capabilities? > > I guess if I have to have a mike included I'll just have > to deal with it. ;-/ > > TIA > -- > GB & 73 > K5OAI > Sam Morgan > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: > http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Don Wilhelm-4
On 5/28/2010 7:44 AM, Don Wilhelm wrote:
> Sam, > > I am not certain why you looking only at Heil. Their products are > somewhat overpriced IMHO. > I focused on Heil, just because the are usually spoke of as the golden standard but folks that can afford to buy whatever they want, so I figured I start there. > I suggest you go to a place that deals in consumer audio - Best Buy, > Circuit City, or even Target stores (Sam Ashe too) and look at what they > have. The popularity of iPods and other such devices have made decent > headphones readily available and at a variety of prices ranging from > inexpensive to very high dollar. > I will consider them, although I thought the extra wide frequency response might be a bit of a problem, even with the K3's rx EQ. > Find a set of headphones that fit your ears and feel like they will be > comfortable after wearing them for a while. > That brings up the point of my asking. Unless you're an unemployed younger person, I doubt you will be spending 12hrs or sometimes more, under the cans. Where as contesting hams sometimes to stretch the limits as far as number of listening hours, and therefore might be better able to address the 'long term comfort' aspect of my question. > If they sound good listening to music, they will sound good on the K3 > too. If you want to customize the response of the K3, that is what the > RX EQ is for - use it instead of spending a great price for so-called > "communications" headphones. > see above > The wireless models free you from the attached cord problem and give you > freedom of movement, but before deciding on one of those, check the > store's return policy - you will want to return them if you have > problems with RF pickup in your shack. > hmmm, not sure how much I'm willing to have some more rf wizzing around the shack to give some Murphy related gremlin into the mix for a free ride?? -- GB & 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Bob Naumann W5OV
I have been using the CM-500 since Nov 2009 and on CW and SSB,now that we can have separate RX EQ per mode,its all you will need,set them up properly by your wish and pay only about $52 for them,like Bob said,its the best bang for the buck without a doubt.
AD4C "If you see a woman handling a cell phone on her hands while she is driving,do please stay away from her.!! --- On Fri, 5/28/10, Bob Naumann <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Bob Naumann <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 Which headphones for stereo cw work? To: "'Sam Morgan'" <[hidden email]>, [hidden email] Date: Friday, May 28, 2010, 12:32 PM Sam, With the K3's excellent receive EQ capability, you can tailor the receive sound most anyway you want, with most any headphones you want. The Yamaha CM500's are very popular and cost a ton less than Heil. I have both the Yamaha and Heil and switch back and forth - they both have their plusses and minuses. I also use Shure E2C earphones (insert into the ear canal) for a change of pace and to reduce ear fatigue. Watch your levels though with any of these. I would suggest finding headphones that you find to be most physically comfortable at a reasonable price and then use the K3 EQ to suit your ears. The Yamaha CM500's are probably the best bang for the buck. 73, Bob W5OV (NJ5DX in WPX CW) -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Sam Morgan Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 7:12 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: [Elecraft] K3 Which headphones for stereo cw work? I know there has been a recent thread about headphones, but this time I would like to focus on just the receive aspect, as I need to buy a set of 'cans' for use 90% use with cw. What I am really confused by is the K3's stereo rx capabilities, with *ONLY* the main receiver. (Looks like the headphones cost a 1/3 as much, as the 2nd receiver will) Does the Heil Proset allow for the stereo (separate channels)? It doesn't specifically say so..... but the Heil Proset Plus does mention stereo Here is the Heil Proset: http://www.heilsound.com/amateur/products/proset/index.htm "Besides sealing out noise passively, the Pro Set now includes Heil Sound's exclusive phase reversal technology, which allows the user to "move" the incoming signal by engaging the phase-reversal switch; this creates a unique spatial widening sound that can, in some situations, significantly improve copy in a tough DX pile-up." "The earphone speakers in the Pro Set Series are 200too-Ohm devices, with a -3 dB point at 8000 Hz. This combination reduces a lot of the hiss found in receiver audio stages. These speakers exhibit medium sensitivity, but they are easily driven by most rigs if you turn the AF Gain control up to about 2 o'clock." == Here is the Heil ProsetPlus: http://www.heilsound.com/amateur/products/prosetplus/index.htm "The Pro Set Plus is wired in a stereo configuration, making them easy to integrate into your SO2R station, and ideal for rigs like the FT-1000D that have a "Balance" control for Main and Sub receiver audio levels." "Also provided on the Pro Set Plus is Heil Sound's exclusive phase reversal technology, which allows the user to "move" the incoming signal by engaging the phase-reversal switch; this creates a unique spatial widening sound that can, in some situations, significantly improve copy in a tough DX pile-up." === I don't plan to operate voice, so I really don't need a mic attached, but it would seem those 2 headphones are among the best as far as long term comfort and ability to do stereo and noise reduction. Are there any other headphones the group would recommended for cw and taking advantage of the K3's stereo capabilities? I guess if I have to have a mike included I'll just have to deal with it. ;-/ TIA -- GB & 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by k5oai
Hi Sam,
Good questions for sure. As I also agree IMHO the Heil stuff is over rated, for full bore 48 hour contests I use Bose QC-2 headphones. http://bit.ly/9bXxL4 I find these to be extremely comfortable especially over 36+ hours of wear time non-stop. They can also be had cheap on the used market. For me running SO2R I have 2 legal limit amps only about a foot away from each ear and I don't know they exist while they are on. For more relaxed operating and having excellent quality I use Sony Studio headphones which you can buy for short $. MDR-V6 http://bit.ly/b9sFh0 I'm a CW guy so a mic is not a requirement for me. But if you like the Bose and want a mic there is this option as well. http://bit.ly/aJ75qX 73 and Good Luck! Lee WW2DX.com On May 28, 2010, at 8:11 AM, Sam Morgan wrote: > I know there has been a recent thread about headphones, > but this time I would like to focus on just the receive aspect, > as I need to buy a set of 'cans' for use 90% use with cw. > > > What I am really confused by is the K3's stereo rx capabilities, > with *ONLY* the main receiver. > (Looks like the headphones cost a 1/3 as much, as the 2nd receiver will) > > Does the Heil Proset allow for the stereo (separate channels)? > It doesn't specifically say so..... > but the Heil Proset Plus does mention stereo > > Here is the Heil Proset: > http://www.heilsound.com/amateur/products/proset/index.htm > > "Besides sealing out noise passively, the Pro Set now includes Heil Sound's > exclusive phase reversal technology, which allows the user to "move" the > incoming signal by engaging the phase-reversal switch; this creates a unique > spatial widening sound that can, in some situations, significantly improve copy > in a tough DX pile-up." > > "The earphone speakers in the Pro Set Series are 200too-Ohm devices, with a -3 > dB point at 8000 Hz. This combination reduces a lot of the hiss found in > receiver audio stages. These speakers exhibit medium sensitivity, but they are > easily driven by most rigs if you turn the AF Gain control up to about 2 o'clock." > > == > > Here is the Heil ProsetPlus: > http://www.heilsound.com/amateur/products/prosetplus/index.htm > > "The Pro Set Plus is wired in a stereo configuration, making them easy to > integrate into your SO2R station, and ideal for rigs like the FT-1000D that have > a "Balance" control for Main and Sub receiver audio levels." > > "Also provided on the Pro Set Plus is Heil Sound's exclusive phase reversal > technology, which allows the user to "move" the incoming signal by engaging the > phase-reversal switch; this creates a unique spatial widening sound that can, in > some situations, significantly improve copy in a tough DX pile-up." > === > > I don't plan to operate voice, so I really don't need a mic attached, > but it would seem those 2 headphones are among the best as far as long term > comfort and ability to do stereo and noise reduction. > > Are there any other headphones the group would recommended for cw and taking > advantage of the K3's stereo capabilities? > > I guess if I have to have a mike included I'll just have to deal with it. ;-/ > > TIA > -- > GB & 73 > K5OAI > Sam Morgan > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Bob Naumann W5OV
This thread reminded me of something that I read back in I believe the
'80s. There was a circuit in which the CW audio was spread spatially, i.e., the lower frequencies were heard toward your left side while the higher frequencies were heard toward the right. The idea was that the brain could do a good job of separating closely-spaced CW signals if they apparently came from different directions. This would require stereo headphones to implement. With the advent of DSP this might be a mode that Lyle could implement in the K3 if there was enough interest and if there was really an advantage in this mode. 72, Jim Campbell - W4BQP ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by k5oai
Since I work in pro audio, I have a selection of very good headphones laying
around. So far, everything Ive tried works with the K3. It all comes down to creature comforts and, to some extent, their ability to reduce room noise. The pro-quality in-ear earphones made by Etymotic Research and Shure are better than most for both comfort and noise isolation. They are passive. I also like my Sony MDR7506, and the comparable consumer version with a different number that is otherwise identical. I agree with Tom about the Sennheiser 280s, but the Yamaha CM500 is plenty good enough for me, producing great contest audio, at about 1/5 the cost. And yes, anything with Heils name on it is wildly overpriced. 73, Jim K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by k5oai
For those interested in external isolation, I found a really neat website which compares noise isolation by frequency range. Select among 4 headphones you're interested in, choose Isolation Response and then click Compare for a graph of isolation by freqluency: http://www.headphone.com/learning-center/build-a-graph.php?graphID[0]=1743&graphID[1]=533&graphID[2]=753&graphID[3]=1753&graphType=6&buttonSelection=Compare+Headphones This shows some significant differences in isolation versus frequency. Bose, Sennheiser, Sony and Etymotic models are included but Yamaha and Extreme Isolation are not. Low frequency noise is most important in my shack due to amplifier fan noise but higher frequencies might be more important for a multiop phone environment. 73, Bill |
You may need to cut and past the entire link into your browser to make it work correctly!
http://www.headphone.com/learning-center/build-a-graph.php?graphID[0]=1743&graphID[1]=533&graphID[2]=753&graphID[3]=1753&graphType=6&buttonSelection=Compare+Headphones |
In reply to this post by Jim Campbell
I think you are referring to March 1999 QST, "Binaural IQ".
That effect is what the K3 AFX Bin mode is supposed to be, insn't it? (For some reason though my ears can't hear the "spatial" separatoin. It sounds different for sure, but I just don't interpret it as spatial separation..) 73, Drew AF2Z On Fri, 28 May 2010 11:50:03 -0400, Jim Campbell - W4BQP wrote: >This thread reminded me of something that I read back in I believe the >'80s. There was a circuit in which the CW audio was spread spatially, >i.e., the lower frequencies were heard toward your left side while the >higher frequencies were heard toward the right. The idea was that the >brain could do a good job of separating closely-spaced CW signals if >they apparently came from different directions. This would require >stereo headphones to implement. > >With the advent of DSP this might be a mode that Lyle could implement in >the K3 if there was enough interest and if there was really an advantage >in this mode. > >72, > >Jim Campbell - W4BQP ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
What!!? You mean your jaw didn't drop and eyes glaze over as did the
author's? Steve N4LQ ----- Original Message ----- From: "drewko" <[hidden email]> To: "Jim Campbell" <[hidden email]> Cc: <[hidden email]> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 4:09 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 Was - Which headphones for stereo cw work? Now - Audio Spread Spectrum >I think you are referring to March 1999 QST, "Binaural IQ". > > That effect is what the K3 AFX Bin mode is supposed to be, insn't it? > (For some reason though my ears can't hear the "spatial" separatoin. > It sounds different for sure, but I just don't interpret it as spatial > separation..) > > 73, > Drew > AF2Z > > > On Fri, 28 May 2010 11:50:03 -0400, Jim Campbell - W4BQP wrote: > >>This thread reminded me of something that I read back in I believe the >>'80s. There was a circuit in which the CW audio was spread spatially, >>i.e., the lower frequencies were heard toward your left side while the >>higher frequencies were heard toward the right. The idea was that the >>brain could do a good job of separating closely-spaced CW signals if >>they apparently came from different directions. This would require >>stereo headphones to implement. >> >>With the advent of DSP this might be a mode that Lyle could implement in >>the K3 if there was enough interest and if there was really an advantage >>in this mode. >> >>72, >> >>Jim Campbell - W4BQP > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
No, but the jaw drop did occur when I was a kid with my first pair of
stereo headphones listening to the Rolling Stones psychedelic album (forget what it was called...) I guess I was expecting something like that from binaural IQ... The funny thing with the K3 AFX is I can't decide if it sounds better or not. It sounds better when I switch it on. Then it sounds better again when I switch it off... Probably too much di-dah di-dah in the noise has ruined my ear to synthesized spatial effects or something... 73, Drew AF2Z On Fri, 28 May 2010 16:13:01 -0400, Steve N4LQ wrote: >What!!? You mean your jaw didn't drop and eyes glaze over as did the >author's? > >Steve >N4LQ ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Bill W4ZV
The graph shows some interesting data for both impedance vs. frequency and frequency response. It demonstrates why the Sony MDR-6V are such favorites among CW operators. They may not be much for low frequency isolation but the frequency response and impedance/sensitivity (high) are a very good match to the K3. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 5/28/2010 4:01 PM, Bill W4ZV wrote: > > > Sam Morgan-3 wrote: >> >> Besides sealing out noise passively >> > > For those interested in external isolation, I found a really neat > website which compares noise isolation by frequency range. Select > among 4 headphones you're interested in, choose Isolation Response > and then click Compare for a graph of isolation by freqluency: > > http://www.headphone.com/learning-center/build-a-graph.php?graphID[0]=1743&graphID[1]=533&graphID[2]=753&graphID[3]=1753&graphType=6&buttonSelection=Compare+Headphones > > This shows some significant differences in isolation versus > frequency. Bose, Sennheiser, Sony and Etymotic models are included > but Yamaha and Extreme Isolation are not. Low frequency noise is > most important in my shack due to amplifier fan noise but higher > frequencies might be more important for a multiop phone environment. > > 73, Bill > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Bill W4ZV
On 5/28/2010 3:04 PM, Bill W4ZV wrote:
> http://www.headphone.com/learning-center/build-a-graph.php?graphID[0]=1743&graphID[1]=533&graphID[2]=753&graphID[3]=1753&graphType=6&buttonSelection=Compare+Headphones > or go to http://tinyurl.com and paste it in there you will get something like this: http://tinyurl.com/345rqym -- GB & 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Joe Subich, W4TV-4
After doing a bit of looking I think the very low THD numbers on these
is also a big benefit. I've since looking ordered a set for Field Day. ~Brett (N7MG) (Previously KC7OTG) On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV <[hidden email]> wrote: > > The graph shows some interesting data for both impedance vs. > frequency and frequency response. It demonstrates why the > Sony MDR-6V are such favorites among CW operators. > > They may not be much for low frequency isolation but the > frequency response and impedance/sensitivity (high) are a > very good match to the K3. > > 73, > > ... Joe, W4TV > > On 5/28/2010 4:01 PM, Bill W4ZV wrote: >> >> >> Sam Morgan-3 wrote: >>> >>> Besides sealing out noise passively >>> >> >> For those interested in external isolation, I found a really neat >> website which compares noise isolation by frequency range. Select >> among 4 headphones you're interested in, choose Isolation Response >> and then click Compare for a graph of isolation by freqluency: >> >> http://www.headphone.com/learning-center/build-a-graph.php?graphID[0]=1743&graphID[1]=533&graphID[2]=753&graphID[3]=1753&graphType=6&buttonSelection=Compare+Headphones >> >> This shows some significant differences in isolation versus >> frequency. Bose, Sennheiser, Sony and Etymotic models are included >> but Yamaha and Extreme Isolation are not. Low frequency noise is >> most important in my shack due to amplifier fan noise but higher >> frequencies might be more important for a multiop phone environment. >> >> 73, Bill >> > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by drewko
On 5/28/2010 3:26 PM, drewko wrote:
> The funny thing with the K3 AFX is I can't decide if it sounds better > or not. It sounds better when I switch it on. Then it sounds better > again when I switch it off... > > Probably too much di-dah di-dah in the noise has ruined my ear to > synthesized spatial effects or something... > I have the same problem here, switch on = (ah that's better) switch back off = (hmm, that sounds better now) then after about 2-3 more of those, it's a case of....... back in the MENU, switch through the different settings for AFX, can't really decide, settle on one out of frustration, just leave it at that setting and go on, until the next time, repeat often as required resulting observation: the K3 just sounds good, no matter what I do to mess it up -- GB & 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |