I'm a new K3 owner, and I chose the K3 in part because of its small
size, because I intend to install it in my boat, which is already cramped for space. I am re-wiring the boat to comply with ABYC (American Boat & Yacht Council) standard E-11, /AC and DC Electrical Systems on Boats/. I have a conventional negative-ground DC system. The ABYC E-11 standard requires that in such a system, overcurrent protection (fuse or circuit breaker) to protect the boat's wiring shall be in the ungrounded (positive, red) conductor and that the grounded (negative, black or yellow) conductors in branch circuits (such as the one that one powers my ham station) shall /not/ have fuse or circuit breakers in them. The /K3 Owner's Manual/, however, states (under "Specifications", on page 8) that "[w]hen a battery is used, both sides of the battery cable should be protected by fast-blow fuses." I wonder why the manual recommends that the negative lead should be fused? Can anyone explain this for me? I intend to wire the K3 power lead with fast-blow fuse in the positive (red) conductor only, in compliance with the ABYC E-11 standard. But ,still, I wonder: why does the K3 manual recommend fuses in /both /conductors: the black (grounded, -12V) as well as the red (ungrounded, +12V)? Jim Maynard, K7KK ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
With car electrics (and a boat may be similar), the reason is that if
the engine grounding strap fails (or is removed and not replaced), the starter motor can draw current via the radio negative lead which leads to damage and possibly fire. 73 Dave, G4AON ----------------- >I wonder why the manual recommends that the negative lead should be >fused? Can anyone explain this for me? ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
On 2011-04-02 01:03 AM, Dave, G4AON wrote:
> With car electrics (and a boat may be similar), the reason is that if > the engine grounding strap fails (or is removed and not replaced), the > starter motor can draw current via the radio negative lead which leads > to damage and possibly fire. > > 73 Dave, G4AON Thank you, Dave, your answer reassures me. In fact, boats are quite different from cars. In cars, it is common to use the chassis as a common ground return. In boats, this is forbidden. To avoid ground loops, the various types of "grounds" on a boat (the DC safety ground [green], the AC safety ground [green or green with yellow stripe], the lightning ground terminal, the bonding ground for prevention of electrolysis, the RF radio ground, etc.) have only one common point, which is usually the engine negative terminal. In boats, only the starter motor is connected directly to the engine negative terminal. Other DC circuits on a boat have three (3) wires: the "ungrounded" normally current-carrying conductor (red, DC+), the "grounded" current-carrying conductor (black or yellow, DC-) and the "grounding" conductor which normally does not carry current (safety ground, green or bare wire). Similarly for AC circuits: the "ungrounded" normally current-carrying conductor (in the USA, black, in the EU, brown), the "ungrounded" current-carrying conductor (in the USA, white, in the EU, light blue), and "grounding" conductor that normally does not carry current (in the USA green, in the EU, green with yellow stripe). Both the DC and AC safety grounds have only one common point: the engine negative terminal. Other circuits, such as the ham radio circuits, are on the other side of a "main" circuit breaker which cuts both the DC+ (red wire) and the DC- (black or yellow wire). Likewise, AC branch circuits are on the other side of a "main" circuit breaker which cuts both the "hot" conductor ("ungrounded", black in US, brown in EU) and the "neutral" conductor ("grounded", white in US, light blue in EU). The safety ground (green with yellow stripe) is never switched. So in the scenario that you describe, if the engine grounding strap should fail or be removed, my boat's main DC circuit breaker will trip, disconnecting both the DC- (black or yellow) and DC+ (red) conductors but leaving the "grounding" safety ground (green wire) connected to the safety ground bus. The branch circuits downstream of the DC main circuit breaker then have fuses or circuit breakers only in the "ungrounded" (red) conductors. Thank you, Dave; your explanation reassures me - because I know how boat wiring differs from automobile wiring. 73, Jim, K7KK ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Jim,
You said: " Likewise, AC branch circuits are on the other side of a "main" circuit breaker which cuts both the "hot" conductor ("ungrounded", black in US, brown in EU) and the "neutral" conductor ("grounded", white in US, light blue in EU). The safety ground (green with yellow stripe) is never switched." The neutral or white wire in USA residential wiring is never "cut" by a circuit breaker. Both neutral and protective ground circuits are continuous and tie together only in the main circuit breaker panel (typically) and neither are "cut" by a circuit breaker. In the case of normal residential 120/240v single phase circuit panels, both "hot wires" are indeed broken by a "Main" 2-pole circuit breaker. 240v branch circuits (2 hots) also use 2-pole breakers. In 120v branch circuits, only the single "hot" wire(black) is "cut" by a circuit breaker. 73, Bob W5OV (retired electrician) -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of James Maynard Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2011 5:41 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [Elecraft] [K3] Why fuse the negative lead from a battery? On 2011-04-02 01:03 AM, Dave, G4AON wrote: > With car electrics (and a boat may be similar), the reason is that if > the engine grounding strap fails (or is removed and not replaced), the > starter motor can draw current via the radio negative lead which leads > to damage and possibly fire. > > 73 Dave, G4AON Thank you, Dave, your answer reassures me. In fact, boats are quite different from cars. In cars, it is common to use the chassis as a common ground return. In boats, this is forbidden. To avoid ground loops, the various types of "grounds" on a boat (the DC safety ground [green], the AC safety ground [green or green with yellow stripe], the lightning ground terminal, the bonding ground for prevention of electrolysis, the RF radio ground, etc.) have only one common point, which is usually the engine negative terminal. In boats, only the starter motor is connected directly to the engine negative terminal. Other DC circuits on a boat have three (3) wires: the "ungrounded" normally current-carrying conductor (red, DC+), the "grounded" current-carrying conductor (black or yellow, DC-) and the "grounding" conductor which normally does not carry current (safety ground, green or bare wire). Similarly for AC circuits: the "ungrounded" normally current-carrying conductor (in the USA, black, in the EU, brown), the "ungrounded" current-carrying conductor (in the USA, white, in the EU, light blue), and "grounding" conductor that normally does not carry current (in the USA green, in the EU, green with yellow stripe). Both the DC and AC safety grounds have only one common point: the engine negative terminal. Other circuits, such as the ham radio circuits, are on the other side of a "main" circuit breaker which cuts both the DC+ (red wire) and the DC- (black or yellow wire). Likewise, AC branch circuits are on the other side of a "main" circuit breaker which cuts both the "hot" conductor ("ungrounded", black in US, brown in EU) and the "neutral" conductor ("grounded", white in US, light blue in EU). The safety ground (green with yellow stripe) is never switched. So in the scenario that you describe, if the engine grounding strap should fail or be removed, my boat's main DC circuit breaker will trip, disconnecting both the DC- (black or yellow) and DC+ (red) conductors but leaving the "grounding" safety ground (green wire) connected to the safety ground bus. The branch circuits downstream of the DC main circuit breaker then have fuses or circuit breakers only in the "ungrounded" (red) conductors. Thank you, Dave; your explanation reassures me - because I know how boat wiring differs from automobile wiring. 73, Jim, K7KK ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Dave, G4AON
I'm not positive (forgive the pun), but I think ideas have changed on that in the UK and you again don't fuse the -ve lead, but I'll need to check.
73 de M0XDF, K3 #174, P3 #108 -- In our day and age it seems that Common Sense is in short supply. If you don't have any Common Sense - get some Common Sense and use it. If you can't find any Common Sense, ask for help from somebody who has some Common Sense. Is Common Sense divine? On 2 Apr 2011, at 09:03, Dave, G4AON wrote: > With car electrics (and a boat may be similar), the reason is that if > the engine grounding strap fails (or is removed and not replaced), the > starter motor can draw current via the radio negative lead which leads > to damage and possibly fire. > > 73 Dave, G4AON > ----------------- >> I wonder why the manual recommends that the negative lead should be >> fused? Can anyone explain this for me? > ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Where will the current will flow if there is a fault? That is the
question. There are two things involved here - wiring the radio negative directly to the battery or wiring it to the vehicle chassis. It does make a difference because of the way most vehicle batteries are tied on the negative terminal. If one wires both positive and negative directly to the battery, the negative should be fused to protect the RADIO in case of a fault between the battery and the engine block. It is not a safety issue. Note carefully that the battery negative is wired both to the engine block and to the chassis by direct wires from the battery negative. If the battery were tied only to the engine block and then the chassis were also tied to the engine block (as was pointed out in the case of the boat), the failure mode would not exist. And it is all because the radio is grounded to the chassis through the antenna connection in addition to the negative lead. If both these grounds go to the chassis instead of the battery negative, the problem solved by the fuse in the negative lead would not exist. If the radio negative is connected to the vehicle chassis, the problem does not exist and the negative lead should NOT be fused. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/2/2011 9:40 AM, David Ferrington, M0XDF wrote: > I'm not positive (forgive the pun), but I think ideas have changed on that in the UK and you again don't fuse the -ve lead, but I'll need to check. > 73 de M0XDF, K3 #174, P3 #108 ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Who's on first Sam kf4yox
Sent from my iPhone On Apr 2, 2011, at 10:19 AM, Don Wilhelm <[hidden email]> wrote: > Where will the current will flow if there is a fault? That is the > question. > > There are two things involved here - wiring the radio negative directly > to the battery or wiring it to the vehicle chassis. It does make a > difference because of the way most vehicle batteries are tied on the > negative terminal. > > If one wires both positive and negative directly to the battery, the > negative should be fused to protect the RADIO in case of a fault between > the battery and the engine block. It is not a safety issue. > > Note carefully that the battery negative is wired both to the engine > block and to the chassis by direct wires from the battery negative. If > the battery were tied only to the engine block and then the chassis were > also tied to the engine block (as was pointed out in the case of the > boat), the failure mode would not exist. > And it is all because the radio is grounded to the chassis through the > antenna connection in addition to the negative lead. If both these > grounds go to the chassis instead of the battery negative, the problem > solved by the fuse in the negative lead would not exist. > > If the radio negative is connected to the vehicle chassis, the problem > does not exist and the negative lead should NOT be fused. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > On 4/2/2011 9:40 AM, David Ferrington, M0XDF wrote: >> I'm not positive (forgive the pun), but I think ideas have changed on that in the UK and you again don't fuse the -ve lead, but I'll need to check. >> 73 de M0XDF, K3 #174, P3 #108 > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by James Maynard-2
On 4/2/2011 3:40 AM, James Maynard wrote:
> In fact, boats are quite different from cars. In cars, it is common to > use the chassis as a common ground return. In boats, this is forbidden. While the chassis serves as an acceptable return for DC current, using it in this manner is a recipe for AC problems, like alternator while and RFI. Ham gear should ALWAYS be powered by paired conductors running directly from the power source, preferably a twisted pair. 73, Jim Brown K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
On 4/2/2011 10:45 AM, Jim Brown wrote:
> While the chassis serves as an acceptable return for DC current, using > it in this manner is a recipe for AC problems, like alternator while and > RFI. Ham gear should ALWAYS be powered by paired conductors running > directly from the power source, preferably a twisted pair. Bad fingers -- I meant to say "alternator whine." :) 73, Jim K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Jim Brown-10
> While the chassis serves as an acceptable return for DC current, using > it in this manner is a recipe for AC problems, like alternator whine > and RFI. In addition, it's a recipe for ignition noise and corona noises since using the chassis of the vehicle as a DC return makes every noise source in the vehicle (plus antenna return currents) "common" to the transceiver power supply. Consider the impedance between the transceiver's chassis connection and the negative terminal of the battery to be equivalent to the modulation choke in an old AM transmitter ... every noise and all of the antenna "return" current modulates the DC reference (DC return) of the transceiver! Proper installation of communications equipment calls for separately fused power connections directly to both terminals of the battery and a substantial common mode choke in the antenna feedline at the feedpoint of the antenna. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 4/2/2011 1:45 PM, Jim Brown wrote: > On 4/2/2011 3:40 AM, James Maynard wrote: >> In fact, boats are quite different from cars. In cars, it is common to >> use the chassis as a common ground return. In boats, this is forbidden. > > While the chassis serves as an acceptable return for DC current, using > it in this manner is a recipe for AC problems, like alternator while and > RFI. Ham gear should ALWAYS be powered by paired conductors running > directly from the power source, preferably a twisted pair. > > 73, Jim Brown K9YC > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Joe and all,
Tom Rauch W8JI (whom I believe is well versed in the installation of radios in vehicles) has disagreed with that about a year ago on this reflector. Those interested in his statements may want to search the archives. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/2/2011 4:09 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote: > Proper installation of communications equipment calls for separately > fused power connections directly to both terminals of the battery > and a substantial common mode choke in the antenna feedline at the > feedpoint of the antenna. > > 73, > > ... Joe, W4TV > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Bob Naumann W5OV
Right, Bob.
What you say is true of AC residential wiring. Boats are different. The so-called "main" AC breaker on a correctly wired boat breaks both the "hot" wire(s) -- black or in 120/240 VAC single phase, black and red) and the "neutral" (white) wire -- coming from the boat's shore power inlet. Also, boats are required (by ABYC E-11) to have a reverse polarity indicator or alarm to alert the user if he plugs his shore power cable into an incorrectly wired shore power pedestal outlet at the marina. The marina's shore power outlet at the pedestal near your slip is, from the point of view of the requirements for residential or factory wiring, a BRANCH outlet, and one in a particularly damp and hazardous location, where a Ground Fault Circuit Interrupter would be appropriate. (Most marinas lack GFCIs however.) The shore power coming on board a boat at its shore power inlet has its neutral and safety ground conductors tied together only at the main power inlet for the whole marina. At the shore power pedestal at your slip, there is usually a noticeable different in AC voltage between the neutral and safety ground. (If indeed, there *is* a safety ground -- too often marinas are wired incorrectly!) This can be a particular hazard in marinas in fresh water. If there were a wiring fault aboard your boat - or a nearby boat - there can be an AC potential gradient in the fresh water surrounding the boats, and anyone swimming nearby can be electrocuted by that AC voltage gradient. (People are more conductive than fresh water, but less conductive than salt water. So-called ESD -- electro-shock drowning -- can and does occur.) So I am wiring my boat acccording to the current ABYC E-11 standard rather than according to the National Electric Code that applies to residential wiring. I am installing ELCIs (Equipment Leakage Circuit Interrupters) for each shore power inlet, and I am also installing an isolation transformer, wired according to E-11, with the case connected to the boatside ground, and the shield between the windings connected to the shoreside neutral (white wire coming from the marina's shoreside pedestal). You are correct, Bob, in describing residential wiring. But boats are different! Jim Maynard, K7KK At 2011-04-02 05:14 AM (Pacif Daylight Savings Time), Bob Naumann wrote: > Jim, > > You said: > > " Likewise, AC branch circuits are on the other side of a "main" circuit > breaker which cuts both the "hot" conductor ("ungrounded", black in US, > brown in EU) and the "neutral" conductor ("grounded", white in US, light > blue in EU). > The safety ground (green with yellow stripe) is never switched." > > The neutral or white wire in USA residential wiring is never "cut" by a > circuit breaker. > > Both neutral and protective ground circuits are continuous and tie together > only in the main circuit breaker panel (typically) and neither are "cut" by > a circuit breaker. > > In the case of normal residential 120/240v single phase circuit panels, both > "hot wires" are indeed broken by a "Main" 2-pole circuit breaker. 240v > branch circuits (2 hots) also use 2-pole breakers. In 120v branch circuits, > only the single "hot" wire(black) is "cut" by a circuit breaker. > > 73, > > Bob W5OV > (retired electrician) > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Joe Subich, W4TV-4
On 4/2/2011 1:09 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
> a substantial common mode choke in the antenna feedline at the > feedpoint of the antenna. Yes. 73, Jim K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Don Wilhelm-4
On 4/2/2011 2:06 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote:
> Tom Rauch W8JI (whom I believe is well versed in the installation of > radios in vehicles) has disagreed with that about a year ago on this > reflector. I don't often disagree with Tom, but sometimes I think he's mistaken. One place we differ is that he recommends powering gear from the alternator rather than the battery. Tom has done a lot of work with serious mobile installations, and he has reasons for his recommendations. 73, Jim K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Joe Subich, W4TV-4
Hmmm, interesting thread, this from a radio colleague who is also into 4x4, off-roading and response, some of this has already been said here, but note the last paragraph:
The logic is that if the main chassis bonding strap fails, and the radio is connected to the battery, then the path from the radio mounting bolts through the negative lead becomes the earth path for the entire vehicle. I have heard stories of other, higher resistance paths becoming overloaded including one of a red-hot glowing throttle return spring. The current UK recommendation is to NOT fuse the negative lead but to bond it to the chassis close to the battery so that it can't become part of that failure circuit, rather than to the battery directly. 73 de M0XDF, K3 #174, P3 #108 -- Too many parents make life hard for their children by trying, too zealously, to make it easy for them. -Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, poet, dramatist, novelist, and philosopher (1749-1832) ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by James Maynard-2
Sadly enough we had a local man in his early 20's who was killed by ESD when he dove in to retrieve a pair of glasses a woman had dropped off the dock. This was in fresh water (Lake Erie) at South Bass island. A bit OT for sure but I do think about that when in a marina with power.
Joe, W8JH, K3 1713
73,
Joe, W8JH K3s, KPA 500, KAT 500 and KX3 happy user. |
Not completely off-topic, Joe.
It bears on why I am wiring my boat to ABYC standards rather than the model National Electric Code (NEC) from the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) -- and on why I am *not* fusing the negative lead in runs from my batteries to branch circuits such as the one that feeds my ham equipment. The recent additions to the ABYC E-11 standard (effective July 2009) requiring ELCIs (Equipment Leakage Circuit Interrupters) were added as a result of a similar ESD incident some years ago here in the Portland, Oregon area. Kids were floating downstream past a local marina's docks to cool off on a hot summer day. One of them, 12-year old Lucas Ritz, was floating on his back with his PFD keeping his head out of the water, when he decided to join his mom, who was walking along the marina in parallel with the kids and keeping an eye on them. As he swam toward his mom, he was electrocuted by the AC voltage gradient in the fresh water. Mom saw that her son was in trouble and leaped in the save him, as suffered electric shock herself, but fortunately did not drown. Dad came rushing to the scene, too late. He suspected that it wasn't a simple drowning, researched the matter, and changed careers to become a teacher of ABYC standards and promoting changes to those standards to prevent future so-called electro-shock drownings (ESDs), some of which, like his son's are not drowning at all, but electrocutions. See this link for the story: <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/terry-gardner/esd-hidden-danger-in-fres_b_693454.html> I recently heard the dad, Kevin Ritz, tell the tale at a seminar he gave at the marina where my boat is being refurbished, and I had read about the story earlier in the local boating press. So I ordered an ELCI (Equipment Leakage Circuit Interrupter) with an automatic disconnect relay to cut both the hot and neutral leads coming from the shore power inlet on my boat in case of either a fault current being detected flowing through the neutral lead from the shore power cord or in case of reverse polarity (white wire "hot", black wire "neutral"). And I added an isolation transformer, too. All these things led me to trust in the ABYC standards rather than the K3 Owner's Manual in deciding how to wire the DC power cable that leads to my K3. And led me to pose the question that started this thread. Jim K7KK -- K3 #5263 "Remember, Ignorance is the Mother of Adventure!" -- Hagar the Horrible In 2011-04-03 12:20 PM, W8JH wrote: > Sadly enough we had a local man in his early 20's who was killed by ESD when > he dove in to retrieve a pair of glasses a woman had dropped off the dock. > This was in fresh water (Lake Erie) at South Bass island. A bit OT for sure > but I do think about that when in a marina with power. > > Joe, W8JH, K3 1713 > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
On 4/3/2011 8:25 PM, James Maynard wrote:
> It bears on why I am wiring my boat to ABYC standards rather than the > model National Electric Code (NEC) from the National Fire Protection > Association (NFPA) -- and on why I am*not* fusing the negative lead in > runs from my batteries to branch circuits such as the one that feeds my > ham equipment. It's critical to realize that Codes and Standards are written for specific situations. NEC applies ONLY to premises wiring, and to some extent, to wiring connected to premises wiring (like a standby generator, or an accessory building, like a garage powered from the same service). It does NOT apply to vehicles, or boats, or to the power company's wiring outside the premises. When Standards and Codes are written, very smart and experienced engineers cogitate and discuss all the possible implications of the requirements of the proposed standard, trying very hard to consider how the system would react to any of the myriad of things that might go wrong, and with serious attention both to how things are done in the real world, and to the laws of physics.For about ten years, I've been a part of that process as a member of the AES Standards Committee, and am a principal author of all of our published standards on EMC. A typical Standard takes 3-5 years to be conceived, written, and adopted. I have a great deal of respect for my colleagues, and others who do this, and for the resulting standards and codes. 73, Jim Brown K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
On 2011-04-04 12:38 AM, Jim Brown wrote:
> It's critical to realize that Codes and Standards are written for specific situations. NEC applies ONLY to premises wiring, and to some > extent, to wiring connected to premises wiring (like a standby > generator, or an accessory building, like a garage powered from the same > service). It does NOT apply to vehicles, or boats, or to the power > company's wiring outside the premises. > > When Standards and Codes are written, very smart and experienced > engineers cogitate and discuss all the possible implications of the > requirements of the proposed standard, trying very hard to consider how > the system would react to any of the myriad of things that might go > wrong, and with serious attention both to how things are done in the > real world, and to the laws of physics.For about ten years, I've been a > part of that process as a member of the AES Standards Committee, and am > a principal author of all of our published standards on EMC. A typical > Standard takes 3-5 years to be conceived, written, and adopted. I have a > great deal of respect for my colleagues, and others who do this, and > for the resulting standards and codes. > > 73, Jim Brown K9YC if I am to make disparaging comments about the use of NEC, it behooves me to purchase my own copy of it. Thank you for making that point. I, too, have been involved in the standards development process, first for computer codes and character sets (I was a member of ANSI X3L2, the same committee that had -- before my participation -- given us ASCII, the American National Standard Code for Information Interchange. Later I was a member of a committee under RTCA, developing standards for the use of GPS in the navigation systems of aircraft.) These people work hard, and it's a lot of fun meeting people from other companies and government agencies involved in the developing those standards. Do you know, Jim, whether the definition of "premises" in the NEC would include an entire marina? Not the boats kept in the marina, but the wiring of such structures as floating docks? 73, Jim Maynard K7KK ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Jim,
It's been a few years since I had to be concerned with the NEC on a daily basis, but I would expect that the answer to your question is yes regarding the marina wiring. I also expect that this thread will have run its course and be ended soon. 73, Bob W5OV -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of James Maynard Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 3:40 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [Elecraft] [K3] Why fuse the negative lead from a battery? On 2011-04-04 12:38 AM, Jim Brown wrote: > It's critical to realize that Codes and Standards are written for specific situations. NEC applies ONLY to premises wiring, and to some > extent, to wiring connected to premises wiring (like a standby > generator, or an accessory building, like a garage powered from the same > service). It does NOT apply to vehicles, or boats, or to the power > company's wiring outside the premises. > > When Standards and Codes are written, very smart and experienced > engineers cogitate and discuss all the possible implications of the > requirements of the proposed standard, trying very hard to consider how > the system would react to any of the myriad of things that might go > wrong, and with serious attention both to how things are done in the > real world, and to the laws of physics.For about ten years, I've been a > part of that process as a member of the AES Standards Committee, and am > a principal author of all of our published standards on EMC. A typical > Standard takes 3-5 years to be conceived, written, and adopted. I have a > great deal of respect for my colleagues, and others who do this, and > for the resulting standards and codes. > > 73, Jim Brown K9YC if I am to make disparaging comments about the use of NEC, it behooves me to purchase my own copy of it. Thank you for making that point. I, too, have been involved in the standards development process, first for computer codes and character sets (I was a member of ANSI X3L2, the same committee that had -- before my participation -- given us ASCII, the American National Standard Code for Information Interchange. Later I was a member of a committee under RTCA, developing standards for the use of GPS in the navigation systems of aircraft.) These people work hard, and it's a lot of fun meeting people from other companies and government agencies involved in the developing those standards. Do you know, Jim, whether the definition of "premises" in the NEC would include an entire marina? Not the boats kept in the marina, but the wiring of such structures as floating docks? 73, Jim Maynard K7KK ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |