Another justification for not swapping for the 2.8Khz filter is that even the 8
pole filters will need to be adjusted if you want exact alignment with any other
filters. Not a really big deal, but if you're a perfectionist...
73,
Tom Childers
Radio Amateur N5GE
Licensed since 1976
QCWA Life Member 35102
ARRL Life Member
Retired Professional
C# Software developer
http://www.n5ge.netOn Fri, 7 Jan 2011 08:11:12 -0800 (PST), Bill W4ZV <
[hidden email]>
wrote:
>One comment on this. Matching the 2.7k filters is not critical at all. For
>example if they vary by 100 Hz total (which is more than I've seen in
>building 4 units), you can set the offset to half the difference in each
>(e.g. one is -0.79 and the other is -0.89, so you set -0.84 for both). With
>an actual 6 dB bandwidth of about 2800 Hz, you will never notice a 50 Hz
>offset.
>
>2.7<>2.8k swap fee = $121, plus second 2.8k for $131, results in $252 more
>expensive versus two stock 2.7k filters at no additional charge. However,
>as they say "It's your money!"
>
>73, Bill
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraftHelp:
http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htmPost: mailto:
[hidden email]
This list hosted by:
http://www.qsl.netPlease help support this email list:
http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Amateur Radio Operator N5GE