|
I have a continuous S7 to S8 noise level at normal SSB bandwidths. If I
had to describe the noise, I would say it sounds like amplified background band noise. The source is outside my house. Removing the antenna drops it to S2-3. It decreases slightly at 15 meters and higher. I have been trying all possible combinations of IF and DSP noise blanking. About the best I can do is to reduce an S7 with a blinking S8 bar to a steady S7. If I don't look at the S meter and try to discern a difference in signal intelligibility, I can't really hear any. I have read glowing reports on the effectiveness of the noise blanker, here and elsewhere. I am wondering if the type of noise is part of the equation, and I just have a type of noise where the noise blanker is less effective, or am I doing something wrong, or do I just have unreasonable expectations? Any suggestions? My next step will be one of the noise canceling gadgets, if I can't improve the K3's noise performance. Happy Holidays Ron W3ZV _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
|
Ron Kenwood wrote:
> I have a continuous S7 to S8 noise level at normal SSB bandwidths. If > I had to describe the noise, I would say it sounds like amplified > background band noise. The source is outside my house. Removing the If the noise is close to gaussian, there is nothing any receiver noise reduction system can do with it, to actually remove it, although it can do things like muting the receiver in gaps in the speech, if the speech is above the noise, or generating a graphic equaliser that de-emphasises frequency not also being used for the speech. > > I have read glowing reports on the effectiveness of the noise blanker, > here and elsewhere. I am wondering if the type of noise is part of the Noise blankers require that the noise be isolated spikes that can be cut out without removing too much of the signal. > equation, and I just have a type of noise where the noise blanker is > less effective, or am I doing something wrong, or do I just have > unreasonable expectations? Knowing the source of the noise might help, as it might give a clue as to its structure and therefore whether there is anything that can be done to mitigate it. > > My next step will be one of the noise canceling gadgets, if I can't > improve the K3's noise performance. For gaussian noise, the best option is to eliminate it at source. Failing that, put it in a null in the antenna pattern will help, providing the noise has a well defined direction. I assume you are referring to the sort of noise cancelling device that works by distorting the antenna pattern. Note that such devices are not suitable when the antenna is already very directional, or the sky noise is not significantly greater than the receiver noise (the device is likely to contribute its own receiver noise). -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work. _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
|
This post was updated on .
In reply to this post by Ron Kenwood
Hello Ron W3ZV. New owner of K3 2324 here. Noise at my QTH is local (lights, powerlines, electrical demand) that runs S5-9+ on SSB, depending upon time of day. It's more on AM, less on CW/Data modes. And that's on everything from my 160-L , 80 dipoles, to 3-El Steppir beam. Depending upon band, the K3 takes it at least 2 and sometimes 3 S units down via the dual NB's, and substantially improves the signal selectivity with the NR. I also use a Wellbrook loop for receive, which really helps with eliminating local stuff by 2-4 S units depending upon the source.
I usually set my IF NB to NAR6 or MED 6, and the DSP NB to dsp t1-6 or 2-6. Check for fidelity on SSB and CW. The NR works for me at 1-1 or 2 or 2-1 or 2. Narrow filters are better, and the NB's settings can vary by band and time of day. The K3 is truly the best of many many radios that I've owned at this noisy QTH in Fairbanks, AK. for dealing with both common and differential-mode QRN. Thank you Elecrafters for the fine Christmas gift of hearing. I would be concerned about your S2-3 w/o the antenna connected. Mine shows one bar only with the coax off the rig. If removing the antenna does not quell the noise to S1, then I suggest you may have common-mode RF ingress from either your power supply, house wiring, or whatever else your K3 is connected to. See Jim K9YC's article on how to deal with this noise: http://audiosystemsgroup.com/RFI-Ham.pdf. I did and it worked for me. I used Fair-Rite Type 31 beads on every cable and coax in the shack. I also used a Tripp-Lite Ultra power conditioner on the 120V feeds, and Type 31 ferrite beads on the 240V for the ACOM amp. Two to three S units of noise were lost via the common-mode suppression described. 73 and Merry Christmas from Santa Land (edited a few times after original post as ideas surfaced) |
|
Just want to reiterate and emphasize what Gary says here. Noise is ADDITIVE,
and what you perceive as a universal presence of broadband noise is very likely coming from MANY different sources -- possibly a hundred or more -- inside the shack, elsewhere inside the home, and external to the home. Common-mode noise emitted from the AC power cords of consumer electronics using cheap switching power supplies is a prime culprit, as it radiates through the house wiring and is easily picked up by your antenna, sometimes leading you to believe that is coming from some external source. Chasing down and suppressing each individual noise source is tedious work at best, but it will yield great dividends in the end. Start by turning off (and in many cases that means unplugging from the mains) EVERYTHING electrical/electronic in your home except your K3. Even the lights, appliances, etc. Then turn stuff back one at a time. Any time the noise floor increases perceptibly, rotate the antenna to find the worst-case bearing for that noise as verified by turning the offending item on and off so you can maximize the difference. Work on suppressing that one noise until it can no longer be detected in its worst-case antenna position. Then on to the next. You may be amazed at the things in your home that are generating horrendous noise! For example, some of the cheap low-voltage halogen light power supplies that are out there are so noisy they can take out the whole radio spectrum whenever that light system is switched on. Once your broadband noise is under control, go after the single-frequency birdies that show up in your bands of interest. Computers and Wi-Fi modems are prime culprits here, but even these noises can be successfully suppressed in most cases. Good luck on this! Bill W5WVO Gary NL7Y wrote: > Hello Ron W3ZV. New owner of K3 2324 here. Noise at my QTH is local > (lights, powerlines, electrical demand) that runs S5-9+ on SSB, > depending upon time of day. It's more on AM, less on CW/Data modes. > And that's on everything from my 160-L , 80 dipoles, to 3-El Steppir > beam. Depending upon band, the K3 takes it at least 2-3 S units down > via the dual NB's, and substantially improves the signal selectivity > with the NR. I also use a Wellbrook loop for receive, which really > helps with eliminating local stuff by 2-4 S units depending upon the > source. > > I set my IF NB to 1-6, and the DSP NB to 1-6 or 2-6. Check for > fidelity on SSB and CW. The NR works for me at 1-1/2 or 2-1/2. Narrow > filters are better, and the NB's settings can vary by band. > > I would be concerned about your S2-3 w/o the antenna connected. If > removing the antenna does not quell the noise to S0, then I suggest > you have common-mode RF ingress from either your power supply, house > wiring, or whatever else your K3 is connected to. See Jim K9AY's > article on how to deal with this noise: > http://audiosystemsgroup.com/RFI-Ham.pdf. I did and it worked for me. > I used Fair-Rite Type 31 beads on every cable and coax in the shack. > I also used a Tripp-Lite Ultra power conditioner on the 120V feeds, > and ferrite beads on the 240V for the ACOM amp. Two to three S units > of noise were lost via the common-mode suppression described. > > 73 and Merry Christmas from Santa Land _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
