Elecraft

K3 (and other) utilities not working

Classic

List

Threaded

18 messages Options

Edward Seeliger

K3 (and other) utilities not working

Are other folks having trouble getting the Elecraft Utilities to connect to the Elecraft server to check for firmware updates? I get the following error "InternetFindNextFile completed with error 0x00000006: The handle is invalid" when I choose "Copy New Files from Elecraft" - K3 Utility 1.13.2.27.
I get the same error with the P3, KAT500, and KPA500 utilities also - current versions.
I use Win 7 (64) Professional.
Thanks for any help provided.
Edd - KD5M
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Dick Dievendorff

Re: K3 (and other) utilities not working

Can you access the Elecraft FTP site with Internet Explorer? I use the same Wininet library as IE.

could there be a firewall issue?

Dick, K6KR

On Mar 26, 2013, at 5:56 PM, Edward Seeliger <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Are other folks having trouble getting the Elecraft Utilities to connect to the Elecraft server to check for firmware updates? I get the following error "InternetFindNextFile completed with error 0x00000006: The handle is invalid" when I choose "Copy New Files from Elecraft" - K3 Utility 1.13.2.27.
> I get the same error with the P3, KAT500, and KPA500 utilities also - current versions.
> I use Win 7 (64) Professional.
> Thanks for any help provided.
> Edd - KD5M
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Jim Sheldon

Re: K3 (and other) utilities not working

In reply to this post by Edward Seeliger

I've been having the exact same problem here. It was suggested that my Anti-Virus software was causing the problem but even completely disabling AVG and turning off the firewall in Windows 7 Pro did not help so I'm in the same boat you are. Others appear to have no problem even using the same op system. My computer's processor is a 64 bit dual core AMD. My workaround has been to download the firmware using FTP and manually move all the files into the proper directory.

Jim - W0EB

Sent from my iPad

On Mar 26, 2013, at 7:56 PM, Edward Seeliger <[hidden email]> wrote:

Edward Seeliger

Re: K3 (and other) utilities not working

In reply to this post by Edward Seeliger

Good evening Dick - Yes, I can go to the ftp site directly with IE.

-----Original Message-----

>From: Dick Dievendorff <[hidden email]>
>Sent: Mar 26, 2013 8:06 PM
>To: Edward Seeliger <[hidden email]>
>Cc: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]>
>Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 (and other) utilities not working
>
>Can you access the Elecraft FTP site with Internet Explorer? I use the same Wininet library as IE.
>
>could there be a firewall issue?
>
>Dick, K6KR
>
>
>On Mar 26, 2013, at 5:56 PM, Edward Seeliger <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Are other folks having trouble getting the Elecraft Utilities to connect to the Elecraft server to check for firmware updates? I get the following error "InternetFindNextFile completed with error 0x00000006: The handle is invalid" when I choose "Copy New Files from Elecraft" - K3 Utility 1.13.2.27.
>> I get the same error with the P3, KAT500, and KPA500 utilities also - current versions.
>> I use Win 7 (64) Professional.
>> Thanks for any help provided.
>> Edd - KD5M
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Edward Seeliger

Re: K3 (and other) utilities not working

In reply to this post by Edward Seeliger

Good evening Jim - my problem has just appeared in the past few weeks. I have an AMD quad core processor. My antivirus is Windows Security Essentials.
Edd

-----Original Message-----

>From: Jim Sheldon <[hidden email]>
>Sent: Mar 26, 2013 8:17 PM
>To: Edward Seeliger <[hidden email]>
>Cc: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]>
>Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 (and other) utilities not working
>
>I've been having the exact same problem here. It was suggested that my Anti-Virus software was causing the problem but even completely disabling AVG and turning off the firewall in Windows 7 Pro did not help so I'm in the same boat you are. Others appear to have no problem even using the same op system. My computer's processor is a 64 bit dual core AMD. My workaround has been to download the firmware using FTP and manually move all the files into the proper directory.
>
>Jim - W0EB
>
>Sent from my iPad
>
>On Mar 26, 2013, at 7:56 PM, Edward Seeliger <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Are other folks having trouble getting the Elecraft Utilities to connect to the Elecraft server to check for firmware updates? I get the following error "InternetFindNextFile completed with error 0x00000006: The handle is invalid" when I choose "Copy New Files from Elecraft" - K3 Utility 1.13.2.27.
>> I get the same error with the P3, KAT500, and KPA500 utilities also - current versions.
>> I use Win 7 (64) Professional.
>> Thanks for any help provided.
>> Edd - KD5M
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Dick Dievendorff

Re: K3 (and other) utilities not working

In reply to this post by Edward Seeliger

I'm not sure what it could be then. Something specific to your environment.
I'm not sure what to suggest. What is your AV tool? I use MS Security Essentials with Windows 7 64-bit.

Dick

On Mar 26, 2013, at 6:20 PM, Edward Seeliger <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Good evening Dick - Yes, I can go to the ftp site directly with IE.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dick Dievendorff <[hidden email]>
>> Sent: Mar 26, 2013 8:06 PM
>> To: Edward Seeliger <[hidden email]>
>> Cc: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]>
>> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 (and other) utilities not working
>>
>> Can you access the Elecraft FTP site with Internet Explorer? I use the same Wininet library as IE.
>>
>> could there be a firewall issue?
>>
>> Dick, K6KR
>>
>>
>> On Mar 26, 2013, at 5:56 PM, Edward Seeliger <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> Are other folks having trouble getting the Elecraft Utilities to connect to the Elecraft server to check for firmware updates? I get the following error "InternetFindNextFile completed with error 0x00000006: The handle is invalid" when I choose "Copy New Files from Elecraft" - K3 Utility 1.13.2.27.
>>> I get the same error with the P3, KAT500, and KPA500 utilities also - current versions.
>>> I use Win 7 (64) Professional.
>>> Thanks for any help provided.
>>> Edd - KD5M
>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>>>
>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>

Bill K9YEQ

Re: K3 (and other) utilities not working

Whatever AV program you use, doesn't mean you are not subject to a virus
loaded by script via email or an infected web site. I do computer work as a
part time effort and I spend a lot of time cleaning systems. Try
downloading an additional program such as Malwarebytes to run a scan. You
don't need to do more than do a trial version. Once loaded I usually
uninstall and then download a new version once I get odd behavior on my PC.
There are other programs to use. The key here is not to have a multitude of
AV programs running at once or you will run into additional problems. If
you need more help email me privately and we'll go from there.

73,
Bill
K9YEQ

-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email]
[mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Dick Dievendorff
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 8:27 PM
To: Edward Seeliger
Cc: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 (and other) utilities not working

I'm not sure what it could be then. Something specific to your environment.

I'm not sure what to suggest. What is your AV tool? I use MS Security
Essentials with Windows 7 64-bit.

Dick

On Mar 26, 2013, at 6:20 PM, Edward Seeliger <[hidden email]>
wrote:

same Wininet library as IE.
>>
>> could there be a firewall issue?
>>
>> Dick, K6KR
>>
>>
>> On Mar 26, 2013, at 5:56 PM, Edward Seeliger <[hidden email]>
wrote:
>>
>>> Are other folks having trouble getting the Elecraft Utilities to connect
to the Elecraft server to check for firmware updates? I get the following
error "InternetFindNextFile completed with error 0x00000006: The handle is
invalid" when I choose "Copy New Files from Elecraft" - K3 Utility
1.13.2.27.
>>> I get the same error with the P3, KAT500, and KPA500 utilities also -
current versions.

>>> I use Win 7 (64) Professional.
>>> Thanks for any help provided.
>>> Edd - KD5M
>>> ______________________________________________________________
>>> Elecraft mailing list
>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>>> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>>>
>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this
>>> email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Harlan Sherriff

Re: K3 (and other) utilities not working

In reply to this post by Edward Seeliger

I'm running Intel dual core and Web root and not having any problems.

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID

Edward Seeliger <[hidden email]> wrote:

>Are other folks having trouble getting the Elecraft Utilities to connect to the Elecraft server to check for firmware updates? I get the following error "InternetFindNextFile completed with error 0x00000006: The handle is invalid" when I choose "Copy New Files from Elecraft" - K3 Utility 1.13.2.27.
>I get the same error with the P3, KAT500, and KPA500 utilities also - current versions.
>I use Win 7 (64) Professional.
>Thanks for any help provided.
>Edd - KD5M
>______________________________________________________________
>Elecraft mailing list
>Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
>This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Igor Sokolov-2

K3 lock out via Inhibit

Yet again I need to organize lock out for a pair of K3s. Therefore couple
of questions for those who knows how to do it.

1)The manual says one need 2.2 to 10k pull up resistor on pin 7 of the ACC
connector from 5V source. There is no 5V source in ACC connector (BTW
Elecraft could easily provide one either on pin 12 or pin 5. Both of them
are now used for GROUND). The easy answer to the problem is to use 12V out
RCA socket on the back panel. Is it necessary to step down that 12V to 5V or
it is safe enough to connect say 20K pull up resistor from 12V to pin 7 ?
2) Is it OK to use Keyout-Lp from pin 10 of one radio to Inh pin 7 of the
other radio and vise versa. What I am concerned about is what happen if on
one of the rigs someone unintentionally switch the setting of pin 7 from
Inh to K3 ON?

73, Igor UA9CDC

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Oliver Dröse

Re: K3 lock out via Inhibit

Hi Igor,

you may want to check this very simple circuit:
http://www.kkn.net/~n6tv/SimpleElecraftK3SO2RLockoutCircuit.pdf

73, Olli - DH8BQA

----- Original Message -----
From: "Igor Sokolov" <[hidden email]>
Cc: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 8:28 PM
Subject: [Elecraft] K3 lock out via Inhibit

> Yet again I need to organize lock out for a pair of K3s. Therefore couple
> of questions for those who knows how to do it.
>
> 1)The manual says one need 2.2 to 10k pull up resistor on pin 7 of the ACC
> connector from 5V source. There is no 5V source in ACC connector (BTW
> Elecraft could easily provide one either on pin 12 or pin 5. Both of them
> are now used for GROUND). The easy answer to the problem is to use 12V
> out RCA socket on the back panel. Is it necessary to step down that 12V to
> 5V or it is safe enough to connect say 20K pull up resistor from 12V to
> pin 7 ?
> 2) Is it OK to use Keyout-Lp from pin 10 of one radio to Inh pin 7 of the
> other radio and vise versa. What I am concerned about is what happen if on
> one of the rigs someone unintentionally switch the setting of pin 7 from
> Inh to K3 ON?
>
> 73, Igor UA9CDC
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
> -----
> E-Mail ist virenfrei.
> Von AVG uberpruft - www.avg.de
> Version: 2013.0.2904 / Virendatenbank: 2641/6205 - Ausgabedatum:
> 26.03.2013

Igor Sokolov-2

Re: K3 lock out via Inhibit

Yes, thank you Olli. The only problem being that if both stations try to TX
then none of them will.

73, Igor UA9CDC

----- Original Message -----
From: "Oliver Dröse" <[hidden email]>
To: "Igor Sokolov" <[hidden email]>
Cc: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 7:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 lock out via Inhibit

> Hi Igor,
>
> you may want to check this very simple circuit:
> http://www.kkn.net/~n6tv/SimpleElecraftK3SO2RLockoutCircuit.pdf
>
> 73, Olli - DH8BQA
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Igor Sokolov" <[hidden email]>
> Cc: <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 8:28 PM
> Subject: [Elecraft] K3 lock out via Inhibit
>
>
>> Yet again I need to organize lock out for a pair of K3s. Therefore
>> couple of questions for those who knows how to do it.
>>
>> 1)The manual says one need 2.2 to 10k pull up resistor on pin 7 of the
>> ACC connector from 5V source. There is no 5V source in ACC connector (BTW
>> Elecraft could easily provide one either on pin 12 or pin 5. Both of them
>> are now used for GROUND). The easy answer to the problem is to use 12V
>> out RCA socket on the back panel. Is it necessary to step down that 12V
>> to 5V or it is safe enough to connect say 20K pull up resistor from 12V
>> to pin 7 ?
>> 2) Is it OK to use Keyout-Lp from pin 10 of one radio to Inh pin 7 of the
>> other radio and vise versa. What I am concerned about is what happen if
>> on one of the rigs someone unintentionally switch the setting of pin 7
>> from Inh to K3 ON?
>>
>> 73, Igor UA9CDC
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
>>
>> -----
>> E-Mail ist virenfrei.
>> Von AVG uberpruft - www.avg.de
>> Version: 2013.0.2904 / Virendatenbank: 2641/6205 - Ausgabedatum:
>> 26.03.2013
>

alorona

Re: K3 lock out via Inhibit

I'm curious... how should that condition be resolved? Should the system randomly
choose one or the other station to transmit, or ...??? If so, then it will
probably need a microprocessor and it will no longer be a 'simple' circuit.

Al W6LX

> The only problem being that if both stations try to TX then none of them will.

>
> 73, Igor UA9CDC

-
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Don Wilhelm-4

Re: K3 lock out via Inhibit

Al,

It is all in the timing. The first K3 to transmit will get priority.
If both try to transmit at exactly the same time (think milliseconds),
then and only then will both be locked out.

73,
Don W3FPR

On 3/28/2013 7:45 PM, Al Lorona wrote:
> I'm curious... how should that condition be resolved? Should the system randomly
> choose one or the other station to transmit, or ...??? If so, then it will
> probably need a microprocessor and it will no longer be a 'simple' circuit.
>
> Al W6LX
>
>

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Igor Sokolov-2

Re: K3 lock out via Inhibit

Don,
I do not think so. Inhibit signal does not disable PTT. Therefore when the
first station starts to TX and then the second station presses PTT the first
station TX would get disabled by Inh right in the middle of the
transmission.
I think it would be easily resolved if K3 firmware is changed so that Inh
signal disables PTT in at the same time.

73, Igor UA9CDC
----- Original Message -----
From: "Don Wilhelm" <[hidden email]>
To: "Al Lorona" <[hidden email]>
Cc: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 6:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 lock out via Inhibit

> Al,
>
> It is all in the timing. The first K3 to transmit will get priority. If
> both try to transmit at exactly the same time (think milliseconds), then
> and only then will both be locked out.
>
> 73,
> Don W3FPR
>
> On 3/28/2013 7:45 PM, Al Lorona wrote:
>> I'm curious... how should that condition be resolved? Should the system
>> randomly
>> choose one or the other station to transmit, or ...??? If so, then it
>> will
>> probably need a microprocessor and it will no longer be a 'simple'
>> circuit.
>>
>> Al W6LX
>>
>>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Val-12

Re: K3 lock out via Inhibit

Igor,

Take a look at ACOM 2S1. This little device is intended to allow two
transceivers to share one antenna (amplifier). Its logic locks out them by
TX inhibit.

73, Val LZ1VB

> Don,
> I do not think so. Inhibit signal does not disable PTT. Therefore when the
> first station starts to TX and then the second station presses PTT the
> first station TX would get disabled by Inh right in the middle of the
> transmission.
> I think it would be easily resolved if K3 firmware is changed so that Inh
> signal disables PTT in at the same time.
>
> 73, Igor UA9CDC
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Don Wilhelm" <[hidden email]>
> To: "Al Lorona" <[hidden email]>
> Cc: <[hidden email]>
> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 6:38 AM
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 lock out via Inhibit
>
>
>> Al,
>>
>> It is all in the timing. The first K3 to transmit will get priority. If
>> both try to transmit at exactly the same time (think milliseconds), then
>> and only then will both be locked out.
>>
>> 73,
>> Don W3FPR
>>
>> On 3/28/2013 7:45 PM, Al Lorona wrote:
>>> I'm curious... how should that condition be resolved? Should the system
>>> randomly
>>> choose one or the other station to transmit, or ...??? If so, then it
>>> will
>>> probably need a microprocessor and it will no longer be a 'simple'
>>> circuit.
>>>
>>> Al W6LX

gm3sek

Re: K3 lock out via Inhibit

In reply to this post by Igor Sokolov-2

>I think it would be easily resolved if K3 firmware is changed so that
Inh
>signal disables PTT in at the same time.

Many K3s are used with external sequencers which depend on the PTT/Inh
logic remaining exactly as it is now.

A far better place for specialized lockout logic is in a box between the
two K3s.

73 from Ian GM3SEK

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Igor Sokolov-2

Re: K3 lock out via Inhibit

Ian,
I agree with your note. Having said that there might be a possibility of yet
another menu setting that would allow different PTT/Inh interaction.
Only designers know what can be easily implemented and what cannot. Separate
lockout box is not a problem for home station. Any extra box when you need
to take rig far away is extra troubles.

73, Igor UA9CDC

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ian White" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 2:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 lock out via Inhibit

>
>>I think it would be easily resolved if K3 firmware is changed so that
> Inh
>>signal disables PTT in at the same time.
>
> Many K3s are used with external sequencers which depend on the PTT/Inh
> logic remaining exactly as it is now.
>
> A far better place for specialized lockout logic is in a box between the
> two K3s.
>
>
> 73 from Ian GM3SEK
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Igor Sokolov-2

Re: K3 lock out via Inhibit

In reply to this post by Val-12

Val, thank you.
I know about lockout box from ACOM. But I am after light and easy portable
solution.

73, Igor UA9CDC
----- Original Message -----
From: "Val" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 lock out via Inhibit

>
> Igor,
>
> Take a look at ACOM 2S1. This little device is intended to allow two
> transceivers to share one antenna (amplifier). Its logic locks out them by
> TX inhibit.
>
> 73, Val LZ1VB
>
>
>> Don,
>> I do not think so. Inhibit signal does not disable PTT. Therefore when
>> the first station starts to TX and then the second station presses PTT
>> the first station TX would get disabled by Inh right in the middle of the
>> transmission.
>> I think it would be easily resolved if K3 firmware is changed so that Inh
>> signal disables PTT in at the same time.
>>
>> 73, Igor UA9CDC
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Don Wilhelm" <[hidden email]>
>> To: "Al Lorona" <[hidden email]>
>> Cc: <[hidden email]>
>> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 6:38 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 lock out via Inhibit
>>
>>
>>> Al,
>>>
>>> It is all in the timing. The first K3 to transmit will get priority.
>>> If both try to transmit at exactly the same time (think milliseconds),
>>> then and only then will both be locked out.
>>>
>>> 73,
>>> Don W3FPR
>>>
>>> On 3/28/2013 7:45 PM, Al Lorona wrote:
>>>> I'm curious... how should that condition be resolved? Should the system
>>>> randomly
>>>> choose one or the other station to transmit, or ...??? If so, then it
>>>> will
>>>> probably need a microprocessor and it will no longer be a 'simple'
>>>> circuit.
>>>>
>>>> Al W6LX
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html