[K3] clarification on VFO and 2nd Rx

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
7 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[K3] clarification on VFO and 2nd Rx

M0XDF
I seem to be very confused about the way VFOa and b control transmit and
want to get some clarification please.

I started (in 2004) with an Yaesu FT-857 and am still using that, the way it
works may well have coloured my understanding. If I may, let me describe
what I understand based on that:

The 857 has 2 VFOs, A & B and at any one time you can see the freq, mode etc
set up on a specific VFO displayed, along with the VFO (id - a or b) that it
is. If I press A/B, it switches from A to B and vice versa. If I have VFOa
selected and Tx, it uses that freq & mode etc to transmit. If I have VFOb
selected and Tx, it uses the settings for VFOb to transmit.
It also has A=B which is slightly confusing and wrong, because it actually
copies VFOa to b - as the A>B button on K3.

A K3 without 2nd RX (KRX3) has 2 VFOs and each VFO can be set up to a
specific frequency and mode, using certain roofing filters and DSP settings
etc.

You always listen and transmit using VFOa settings.
To use the VFOb settings you must tap A/B, which swaps the settings between
VFOa and VFOb, therefore meaning that VFOa is now using the settings that
were on VFOb? And when you transmit, you're using those. When you do this,
the TX and ^ (black arrow above TX) icons will show you as transmitting on
VFOa?
This is pretty much as per the FT-857, I just never thought of it in that
way (I also think of the rig using different circuits to transmit, but I
doubt now that it is).


If you are working split, you transmit on the freq, mode etc., set up in
VFOb - it uses VFOb for transmit. In this scenario, SPLIT, TX and v will be
shown to indicate you are transmitting on VFOb?


If you have the 2nd RX (KRX3) fitted and ON (SUB on), VFOb is used to
control it. In other words, the KRX3 module does not have VFO circuits on
it, it requires a VFO (B) to set it up etc.
All the other rules above apply though?

If the SUB is not on, its pretty much as first described?
Can you even turn on the SUB if its not fitted and if you can, what happens?


Finally, the [REV] button described on pg 15 as exchanging VFO a & b
temporarily - what does that mean - while you have it pressed it swaps and
if you release, they go back? If so, while you have it pressed and you Tx,
does if use VFOb settings?

Thank you Elecraft for making think about what is actually going on inside
my rig - please now help me to think about what is going on inside my head!
Hi
--
Once upon a time a man whose axe was missing suspected his neighbour's son.
The boy walked like a thief, looked like a thief, and spoke like a thief.
But the man found his axe while digging in the valley, and the next time he
saw his neighbour's son, the boy walked, looked and spoke like any other
child. -Lao-tzu, philosopher (6th century BCE)
 


_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [K3] clarification on VFO and 2nd Rx

Don Wilhelm-4
David,

It may help if you mentally divorce the physical VFOs from the A and B
designations and think of the DISPLAYED frequencies.

The main receiver will receive on whatever frequency is displayed on the
VFO A readout, the sub-receiver (if installed) will receive on whatever
frequency is displayed on VFO B.

When SPLIT is active, the above conditions are still true.  In SPLIT,
transmit will take place on the frequency that is shown in the VFO B
display.

How you alter the frequencies between the VFO A and VFO B is the result
of the button pushing.  A>B will make both VFOs the same - the contents
of  VFO A are copied into both VFOs.  A/B will swap the contents between
A and B.  While you hold REV, the contents of A and B are swapped only
until you release the button.

In non-split operation, the A/B button will allow you to rapidly switch
between two different transmit (and receive) frequencies.

Normal SPLIT operation *might* proceed something like this:  Tune to the
frequency where you wish to transmit with VFO A (maybe you hear the
station that the DX is currently working), then tap A>B.  Now tune so
you hear the DX station (with VFO A).  Press the REV button when you
want to listen to your transmit frequency.  You can alter your transmit
frequency by holding the REV button and tune (with VFO A knob) or by
tapping A/B to swap, then re-tune and tap A/B again to swap back.  It
works fine this way on the K2, but the K3 adds a separate knob for VFO B
which will be helpful for refining the transmit frequency, especially
when the sub-receiver is installed.

With the sub-receiver installed, it becomes more flexible because the
sub-receiver will be tuned to your SPLIT transmit frequency and you can
listen to that frequency in one ear if you have that selected.

There are a thousand other scenarios that are possible for split
operation and perhaps others will offer their favorite operating
patterns with it.

73,
Don W3FPR

David Ferrington, M0XDF wrote:

> I seem to be very confused about the way VFOa and b control transmit and
> want to get some clarification please.
>
> If you are working split, you transmit on the freq, mode etc., set up in
> VFOb - it uses VFOb for transmit. In this scenario, SPLIT, TX and v will be
> shown to indicate you are transmitting on VFOb?
>
>
> If you have the 2nd RX (KRX3) fitted and ON (SUB on), VFOb is used to
> control it. In other words, the KRX3 module does not have VFO circuits on
> it, it requires a VFO (B) to set it up etc.
> All the other rules above apply though?
>
> If the SUB is not on, its pretty much as first described?
> Can you even turn on the SUB if its not fitted and if you can, what happens?
>
>
> Finally, the [REV] button described on pg 15 as exchanging VFO a & b
> temporarily - what does that mean - while you have it pressed it swaps and
> if you release, they go back? If so, while you have it pressed and you Tx,
> does if use VFOb settings?
>
> Thank you Elecraft for making think about what is actually going on inside
> my rig - please now help me to think about what is going on inside my head!
> Hi
>  
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [K3] clarification on VFO and 2nd Rx

M0XDF
Thank you Don, I kinda thought that was how it was and in typing the mail,
came to realise I need to think in terms as you stated. So then I just
wanted clarification.

I have on more question then - lets say I have the KRX3 (I will when it
ships :-). I'm working a split DX, there's one hell of a pile-up (must be
3B7C again). I'm using diversity receive, so I can hear both the DX freq and
their QSX, I want to transmit 300 Hz higher than I'm listening to on the Sub
- how does one do that quickly?

Perhaps use RIT on the SUB, is that possible - i.e., press [B SET] and set
RIT to be 300Hxz higher?

Then lets assume I don't work them, but want to check if they did listen
around where I transmitted, can I then press [REV] and while keeping it
depressed, HOLD [CLR] to add the RIT to the SUB freq and clear the RIT?

I know these are things I'll be able to figure out once I get the K3, but I
got to do something while I'm waiting for the Big Brown Van

On 16/10/07 14:18, "Don Wilhelm" <[hidden email]> sent:

> David,
>
> It may help if you mentally divorce the physical VFOs from the A and B
> designations and think of the DISPLAYED frequencies.


--
Any fool can destroy trees. They cannot defend themselves or run away. And
few destroyers of trees ever plant any; nor can planting avail much toward
restoring our grand aboriginal giants. It took more than three thousand
years to make some of the oldest of the Sequoias, trees that are still
standing in perfect strength and beauty, waving and singing in the mighty
forests of the Sierra. -John Muir, naturalist, explorer, and writer
(1838-1914)


_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [K3] clarification on VFO and 2nd Rx - erratum

M0XDF
In reply to this post by Don Wilhelm-4
Arrrgggghhh

For RIT below, read XIT


Thank you Don, I kinda thought that was how it was and in typing the mail,
came to realise I need to think in terms as you stated. So then I just
wanted clarification.

I have on more question then - lets say I have the KRX3 (I will when it
ships :-). I'm working a split DX, there's one hell of a pile-up (must be
3B7C again). I'm using diversity receive, so I can hear both the DX freq and
their QSX, I want to transmit 300 Hz higher than I'm listening to on the Sub
- how does one do that quickly?

Perhaps use RIT on the SUB, is that possible - i.e., press [B SET] and set
RIT to be 300Hxz higher?

Then lets assume I don't work them, but want to check if they did listen
around where I transmitted, can I then press [REV] and while keeping it
depressed, HOLD [CLR] to add the RIT to the SUB freq and clear the RIT?

I know these are things I'll be able to figure out once I get the K3, but I
got to do something while I'm waiting for the Big Brown Van

On 16/10/07 14:18, "Don Wilhelm" <[hidden email]> sent:

> David,
>
> It may help if you mentally divorce the physical VFOs from the A and B
> designations and think of the DISPLAYED frequencies.


--
Any fool can destroy trees. They cannot defend themselves or run away. And
few destroyers of trees ever plant any; nor can planting avail much toward
restoring our grand aboriginal giants. It took more than three thousand
years to make some of the oldest of the Sequoias, trees that are still
standing in perfect strength and beauty, waving and singing in the mighty
forests of the Sierra. -John Muir, naturalist, explorer, and writer
(1838-1914)


_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [K3] clarification on VFO and 2nd Rx - erratum

Don Wilhelm-4
David,

I think the real answer to those extensions will have to wait until
after the KRX3 ships.  I really don't know how RTI and XIT interact with
the sub-receiver, nor have I though about how to best utilize it in
situations like you have posed.

73,
Don W3FPR

David Ferrington, M0XDF wrote:

> Arrrgggghhh
>
> For RIT below, read XIT
>
>
> Thank you Don, I kinda thought that was how it was and in typing the mail,
> came to realise I need to think in terms as you stated. So then I just
> wanted clarification.
>
> I have on more question then - lets say I have the KRX3 (I will when it
> ships :-). I'm working a split DX, there's one hell of a pile-up (must be
> 3B7C again). I'm using diversity receive, so I can hear both the DX freq and
> their QSX, I want to transmit 300 Hz higher than I'm listening to on the Sub
> - how does one do that quickly?
>
> Perhaps use RIT on the SUB, is that possible - i.e., press [B SET] and set
> RIT to be 300Hxz higher?
>
> Then lets assume I don't work them, but want to check if they did listen
> around where I transmitted, can I then press [REV] and while keeping it
> depressed, HOLD [CLR] to add the RIT to the SUB freq and clear the RIT?
>
> I know these are things I'll be able to figure out once I get the K3, but I
> got to do something while I'm waiting for the Big Brown Van
>
> On 16/10/07 14:18, "Don Wilhelm" <[hidden email]> sent:
>
>  
>> David,
>>
>> It may help if you mentally divorce the physical VFOs from the A and B
>> designations and think of the DISPLAYED frequencies.
>>    
>
>
>  
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [K3] clarification on VFO and 2nd Rx

Vic K2VCO
In reply to this post by Don Wilhelm-4
Don Wilhelm wrote:

> How you alter the frequencies between the VFO A and VFO B is the result
> of the button pushing.  A>B will make both VFOs the same - the contents
> of  VFO A are copied into both VFOs.  A/B will swap the contents between
> A and B.  While you hold REV, the contents of A and B are swapped only
> until you release the button.
>
> In non-split operation, the A/B button will allow you to rapidly switch
> between two different transmit (and receive) frequencies.

When the sub-receiver becomes available, there will also be a special
mode which allows you to 'slave' both VFOs to the main tuning knob. This
will permit true diversity reception, with separate antennas on each
receiver.

I am looking forward to trying this, perhaps with a vertical and
horizontal antenna. Hopefully one signal will get stronger when the
other QSBs!

I don't know what Wayne plans for the audio. In the years of AM,
diversity setups compared AVC (that's what AGC used to be called)
voltages and switched to the best signal. Of course you could listen to
the two antennas in separate ears, but it would be interesting to
somehow combine the audio signals so you would get a (relatively)
QSB-free result.
--
73,
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [K3] clarification on VFO and 2nd Rx

Bob Cunnings NW8L
For years here at my place of employment we've offered UHF diversity
receivers where, instead of  switching between the two signals, we
blend the audio outputs of the receivers in a ratio controlled by the
RF level of the received signals in the two receiver sections. Once
done using analog circuitry, we do it in the digital domain these
days. We refer to it as "ratio combining diversity".

Bob NW8L

On 10/16/07, Vic K2VCO <[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> I don't know what Wayne plans for the audio. In the years of AM,
> diversity setups compared AVC (that's what AGC used to be called)
> voltages and switched to the best signal. Of course you could listen to
> the two antennas in separate ears, but it would be interesting to
> somehow combine the audio signals so you would get a (relatively)
> QSB-free result.
> --
> 73,
> Vic, K2VCO
> Fresno CA
> http://www.qsl.net/k2vco
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com