K3, contests and band allocations

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

K3, contests and band allocations

k6rb
I won't get into the debate about contests. One thing to consider, though,
is that when the licensing authorities are thinking about making band
allocation changes, they tend to monitor the allocated bands and band
segments for levels of activity. Have you listened to the CW sub-bands on
a weekday day or night, recently? Were it not for DXpeditions (I'm not a
DXer) and popular contests (I am a contester), these band segments would
sound very, very underutilized. And, that means, subject to allocation
revisions. Remember when CW in the US had 3.5 to 3.8 MHz? Do we have it
anymore?

Now, should ham radio ever return to the days of crowded CW sub-bands on a
more continuous basis, it's nice to know that rigs like the K3 will allow
those stations to be a lot closer together without making their presence
known to the other guy. If the bands were crowded with users this weekend
(forget about what they were doing for a second), consider it a blessing.
Would you prefer they be full of ragchew QSOs, instead? Then get on the
air and make some QSOs. If at 0000Z last Saturday, the 20 m CW sub-bands
were full of ragchewers spaced a couple of hundred Hertz apart, from 14.0
to 14.050, then the ARRL DX contesters would have been forced to start on
14.051 and up.

When I'm ragchewing (which is often), I'm at much greater risk of being
QRM'd by a DX-chaser working split than I am by any contester. But, you
know what, I'm glad they're making the band sound used.

Rob K6RB

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K3, contests and band allocations

N5GE

Below...

73,
Tom
Amateur Radio Operator N5GE
ARRL Lifetime Member
QCWA Lifetime Member

"Only the federal government would believe they could cut the top
off a blanket, sew it to the bottom and have a longer blanket."
-- American Indian comment about Daylight Saving Time --

On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 13:27:09 -0800, [hidden email] wrote:

[snip]
>Remember when CW in the US had 3.5 to 3.8 MHz? Do we have it
>anymore?

Yes.  CW operation is permitted throughout all amateur bands including the new
allocations on 60m.  In fact, CW was never banned above 3.8MHz on 80m.

CW and digital modes are the most efficient modes for critical communications...

>Rob K6RB

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Amateur Radio Operator N5GE