|
I won't get into the debate about contests. One thing to consider, though,
is that when the licensing authorities are thinking about making band allocation changes, they tend to monitor the allocated bands and band segments for levels of activity. Have you listened to the CW sub-bands on a weekday day or night, recently? Were it not for DXpeditions (I'm not a DXer) and popular contests (I am a contester), these band segments would sound very, very underutilized. And, that means, subject to allocation revisions. Remember when CW in the US had 3.5 to 3.8 MHz? Do we have it anymore? Now, should ham radio ever return to the days of crowded CW sub-bands on a more continuous basis, it's nice to know that rigs like the K3 will allow those stations to be a lot closer together without making their presence known to the other guy. If the bands were crowded with users this weekend (forget about what they were doing for a second), consider it a blessing. Would you prefer they be full of ragchew QSOs, instead? Then get on the air and make some QSOs. If at 0000Z last Saturday, the 20 m CW sub-bands were full of ragchewers spaced a couple of hundred Hertz apart, from 14.0 to 14.050, then the ARRL DX contesters would have been forced to start on 14.051 and up. When I'm ragchewing (which is often), I'm at much greater risk of being QRM'd by a DX-chaser working split than I am by any contester. But, you know what, I'm glad they're making the band sound used. Rob K6RB ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
Below... 73, Tom Amateur Radio Operator N5GE ARRL Lifetime Member QCWA Lifetime Member "Only the federal government would believe they could cut the top off a blanket, sew it to the bottom and have a longer blanket." -- American Indian comment about Daylight Saving Time -- On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 13:27:09 -0800, [hidden email] wrote: [snip] >Remember when CW in the US had 3.5 to 3.8 MHz? Do we have it >anymore? Yes. CW operation is permitted throughout all amateur bands including the new allocations on 60m. In fact, CW was never banned above 3.8MHz on 80m. CW and digital modes are the most efficient modes for critical communications... >Rob K6RB ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Amateur Radio Operator N5GE
|
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
