Joe,
if you follow QRO- and QRP-traffic and change 10 times back and forth, you sure wish to have something to toggle easily between. Multiturn is fine for adjusting. 2 preset power levels would be enough for me. I think about PF1. But I can live with this multiturn potentiometer. The rig is superb. Benny oh9nb __________________________ Benny, it's just the turn of a pot! How difficult or inconvenient could that be. hi de Joe, aa4nn _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Yes, I'm not complaining and Wayne has said there will be a low power tune
option coming. Wayne/Eric, perhaps it would be a good idea to maintain a public list of all the enhancement requests, so people know whats been asked for? This could be done at Zerobeat, but it would take a while to compile the list. Anyway, a number of posibilities for Elecraft to consider at some future date: 1) A Main Menu item to set power control coarseness 2) A CONFIG menu item to set coarseness 3) A MAIN MENU item to switch 'MON' from monitor to an alternative 'rate' of power control and then a hold of MON would switch from fine to course. 4) Then to satisfy those who want course more often than fine, a CONFIG item to toggle PWR and MON-PWR so one is course and one is fine and you can choose which one is 'normal' power. On 16/1/08 15:02, "Charles Fulp" <[hidden email]> sent: > You are right David! > If the knob went from 0 to 120 with 1 almost full rotation, I would > think that was reasonable, but seems to me it is a LOT of cranking to go > from 120 to 4 or 5, even for occasional fun changes... nicely precise > though. > > a few presets would be very nice or tuning rate change for the power > knob would be workable. > > I would not be surprised if something like that happens, knowing the way > the engineers at Elecraft work. > > Plenty of little things that can be fixed, but it is miles ahead of the > early (and my guess present) Orions, in user interface. Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. -Donald Knuth, computer scientist (1938- ) _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
I's been suggested to me by someone not on this reflector (shame), that the
power control should perhaps be logarithmic - running in dB. That sounds like a good idea. On 16/1/08 16:02, "David Ferrington, M0XDF" <[hidden email]> sent: > Yes, I'm not complaining and Wayne has said there will be a low power tune > option coming. > > Wayne/Eric, perhaps it would be a good idea to maintain a public list of all > the enhancement requests, so people know whats been asked for? > This could be done at Zerobeat, but it would take a while to compile the list. > > > Anyway, a number of posibilities for Elecraft to consider at some future date: > 1) A Main Menu item to set power control coarseness > 2) A CONFIG menu item to set coarseness > 3) A MAIN MENU item to switch 'MON' from monitor to an alternative 'rate' of > power control and then a hold of MON would switch from fine to course. > 4) Then to satisfy those who want course more often than fine, a CONFIG item > to toggle PWR and MON-PWR so one is course and one is fine and you can choose > which one is 'normal' power. > > On 16/1/08 15:02, "Charles Fulp" <[hidden email]> sent: > >> You are right David! >> If the knob went from 0 to 120 with 1 almost full rotation, I would >> think that was reasonable, but seems to me it is a LOT of cranking to go >> from 120 to 4 or 5, even for occasional fun changes... nicely precise >> though. >> >> a few presets would be very nice or tuning rate change for the power >> knob would be workable. >> >> I would not be surprised if something like that happens, knowing the way >> the engineers at Elecraft work. >> >> Plenty of little things that can be fixed, but it is miles ahead of the >> early (and my guess present) Orions, in user interface. -- An old miser kept a tame jackdaw, that used to steal pieces of money, and hide them in a hole, which a cat observing, asked, "Why he would hoard up those round shining things that he could make no use of?" "Why," said the jackdaw, "my master has a whole chestfull, and makes no more use of them that I do." -Jonathan Swift, satirist (1667-1745) _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Or the faster you spin the knob the larger the stepping increment.
de Joe, aa4nn ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Ferrington, M0XDF" <[hidden email]> > I's been suggested to me by someone not on this reflector (shame), that > the > power control should perhaps be logarithmic - running in dB. > That sounds like a good idea. _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by M0XDF
I'd make it go in 0.1W increments to 1W, 1W increments to 10W, then 5W incremments to 100W. That's about 40 steps. I don't know how many turns of the control that would need.
Julian, G4ILO. K2 #392 K3 #222 KX3 #110
* G4ILO's Shack - http://www.g4ilo.com * KComm - http://www.g4ilo.com/kcomm.html * KTune - http://www.g4ilo.com/ktune.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |