|
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:50:18 -0700, Bill W5WVO wrote:
>While all these transmitters except >Channel 2 have fundamentals well above 54 MHz (I run a DCI bandpass filter to >keep it out of my preamp), the accumulated grunge from the transmitters' >perfectly legal low-level spurious emissions and passive mixes are enough to >render 6 meters unusable for weak-signal work in the direction of the Yes. Several decades ago, I was on the tech committee that maintained ham repeaters on 2M, 220, and 440. All VHF and UHF broadcasters in Chicago are located on two buildings downtown -- Sears and Hancock. Thanks to that grunge, a 2M receiver was completely useless anywhere near downtown. I did manage to make a 220 MHz receiver in a 101st floor window at Hancock "sort of" work to fill in holes caused by shadowing of the main RX. It was shadowed by the building from the transmitters for Ch 9 and Ch 11. I suspect that your 6M problem will be greatly improved when your Ch 2 goes away. I had a Ch 2 to deal with in Chicago too, but they were only running about 20-30kW ERP. One very large blessing of DTV is that nearly all the low- band VHF channels are going away (that is, Ch 2-6). The reason is that DTV is rather susceptible to impulse noise, and impulse noise is much worse at low VHF than at higher frequencies. 73, Jim Brown K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by Stephen Prior
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:26:58 +0000, Stephen Prior wrote:
>I have a DK9SQ 10 metre long 'fishing pole'. Yes. This is a winner! Tape a wire to it, and run some radials to act as a counterpoise. I have a zip-lock bag filled with lengths of #22 for exactly this purpose. Works great! 73, Jim K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by Bob Cunnings NW8L
I have a couple of used 40' fiberglass "hot sticks" that a guy was selling locally some time ago. They're not backpacking light and even as stout as they look, they're pretty limber and need some guying. The other downside: they're bright yellow except the top section which is day-glow green. --- On Wed, 2/25/09, Bob Cunnings <[hidden email]> wrote: > From: Bob Cunnings <[hidden email]> > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX-1 what do you use for an antenna when you're in a place with no trees to throw the vertical up? > To: [hidden email] > Date: Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 4:16 PM > Out here I often operate in the desert, with no trees at all > for > antennas or shade! I use a 32 foot telescoping fiberglass > pole > (sometimes 2) from The Mast Company to get wire in the air > nice and > high, either as horizontal doublets, vees, or slopers. > > http://www.tmastco.com/main/page_products_telescopic_poles.html > > Bob NW8L > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Garrett, Russ > <[hidden email]> wrote: > > I have a camping trip planned and will likely be in a > few places where > > there are no trees where I will easily get a vertical > wire up. What > > does everyone else do when the surroundings are not > ideal for a wire in > > a tree? I have seen other antennas referenced such > as the buddystick > > and the PAC-12. > > > > Thanks > > > > Russ Garrett > > Kd7mpk > > > > > > mail.bullivant.com made the following annotations > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Please be advised that, unless expressly stated > otherwise, any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this > e-mail, including attachments, is not intended to be used by > any person for the purpose of avoiding any penalties that > may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. > > > ********************************************************* > > This e-mail is for the sole use of the intended > recipient(s) and contains information belonging to Bullivant > Houser Bailey, which is confidential and/or legally > privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are > hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution > or taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this > e-mail information is strictly prohibited. > > If you have received this e-mail in error, please > immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy > all copies of the original message. > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > > Elecraft mailing list > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > > Please help support this email list: > http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: > http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by RussG
Thanks to all that responded. The general consensus is that using the
buddistick, pac-12 or some other version of coil and shorter vertical is not as effective as simply getting up as high as possible with a vertical wire antenna and radial/counterpoise. Other than the tree, most have suggested a telescopic pole made of fiberglass and there are several on the market. They will need to be supported with guy lines. I have used a 28 foot vertical. The 32 would be ideal I would guess as the next smallest is 22 ft. Thanks again Russ Kd7mpk mail.bullivant.com made the following annotations --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please be advised that, unless expressly stated otherwise, any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this e-mail, including attachments, is not intended to be used by any person for the purpose of avoiding any penalties that may be imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. ********************************************************* This e-mail is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and contains information belonging to Bullivant Houser Bailey, which is confidential and/or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this e-mail information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. --------------------------------------------------------------------- ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
Unless you're camped on a salt water beach, use that pole to support an inverted vee (which can be part of the guy system). --- On Wed, 2/25/09, Garrett, Russ <[hidden email]> wrote: > From: Garrett, Russ <[hidden email]> > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX-1 what do you use for an antenna when you're in a place with no trees to throw the vertical up? > To: [hidden email] > Date: Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 7:17 PM > Thanks to all that responded. The general consensus is that > using the > buddistick, pac-12 or some other version of coil and > shorter vertical is > not as effective as simply getting up as high as possible > with a > vertical wire antenna and radial/counterpoise. Other than > the tree, > most have suggested a telescopic pole made of fiberglass > and there are > several on the market. They will need to be supported > with guy lines. > I have used a 28 foot vertical. The 32 would be ideal I > would guess as > the next smallest is 22 ft. > > Thanks again > > Russ > Kd7mpk ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
